- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Messages
- 1,398
- Reaction score
- 64
dude, I have a 3.9+ and 40+. I took it down because it was very distracting getting responses (to my posts on the forum) about my numbers.
Dude, that response is sooo totally Berkeley...

dude, I have a 3.9+ and 40+. I took it down because it was very distracting getting responses (to my posts on the forum) about my numbers.
Dude, that response is sooo totally Berkeley...![]()
And what of you? If you can't beat them with substance, act wry and tack on a weird smiley face, like this: 😴
I think a Berkeley education is not much different than a HYP education...It's not like Berkeley is a random state directional school. In fact, Berkeley owns HYP in certain areas (chemistry)
An ivy league school has much less of the competition and carnage of a large state school. Each year, I think 700-800 students from Berkeley apply to medical school...
With all of this banter regarding grades, I'll say this: I find that the people with the highest GPA's are usually not the most intelligent. The most intelligent usually have marks that are high or above average, but not perfect or exceptional. Most classes, especially science classes, really only approach basic concepts, principles, themes, events and ideas. Striving for perfect grades in these classes is really more monotony and diligence than exercising high intelligence and creativity and can be excruciatingly boring if the subject is not interesting or engaging.
None of the most brilliant people I knew at Yale received an honors distinction, yet they have gone on to become exceptional scholars, artists and entrepreneurs. On the other hand, those with the highest marks tended to follow very prescribed careers in banking, consulting, medicine and law.
To the OP: Just try to get the best numbers that you can. None of what these guys are arguing about matters. You probably know where you fall intelligence-wise and just be comfortable with that because that will probably not change in your lifetime. You'll be fine with a slightly lower GPA from Dartmouth but not a lower MCAT. Just get the best numbers that you can. That's how the game is played and that's all you need to know.
I feel like every single alum who shows up on the front page of our school website or school newspaper graduated summa cum laude... Literally, everyone who makes a big impact on the world had an amazing GPA during their undergrad... It makes me feel like if I don't get summa cum laude, I don't have a shot at all to become a big name.
strong old thread bump. gjdmIf you compare the grading policies, course retake and withdraw policies with many of these schools average GPAs, you can easily see that there is systematic grade inflation. Look at the disparities between Stanford University and UC Berkeley.
35% A's and A-'s (so about 15% get A's, 20% get A-'s). Princeton's average GPA is 3.28, guess what UC Berkeley's is?
http://gradeinflation.com/Ucberkeley.html
So you're saying UC Berkeley's grades are inflated?
What school do you go to, let's look up your average GPA.