gschl1234 said:
I have another friend who went to Reed and they don't have grades there at all. They have narratives. Maybe that's the way to go. Narratives would mean a lot more work for the profs but the students would probably get a lot more out of it. On TOTN they had a prof from a small college that did narratives. I think she did a good job selling the idea.
Reed does in fact have letter grades... but they are not really discussed, unless you are making C's or below in your courses.
My honors college, the New College of Florida, does have narrative evaluations. They are okay, but some professors cannot write very well (and/or simply do not give credit where credit is due) so this creates an inherent problem in evaluating the student's work; hence, a student that is actually a very strong student may sound mediocre on paper because a professor minimalizes the student's efforts in the narrative evaluation.
Another problem that is inherent in contract-style narrative evaluations is the glaring lack of accountability, on the behalf of both the student and professor. Too many weak/slacking/flakey students manage to manipulate their way through the system because they are not held accountable for their actions or lack thereof. Likewise, professors rarely fail students because it looks bad for the department/enrollment/admissions/etc., and they resort to simply giving the students "incompletes" or marginally-satisfactory evaluations, thereby pushing them right on through the system.
And believe me, it is VERY difficult to get accepted to professional schools with only narrative evaluations... without a bonafide GPA or various merit accolades.
Don't get me wrong, I've certainly capitalized on this pioneering experience, but way too many students do not.