see..... no.. Apparently you have been wrong about this. I made specific statements regarding their practice and then made a blanket statement to describe those specifics. You just didnt like it, and in true noob butthurt fashion, said nothing of any true value while attempting to refute the claim. My statements had nothing to do with their ability to support a practice. Are you aware of what a "straw man" is? I would gladly admit that I was wrong.... if that were actually the case here. See.... people of your.... lets call it "intellect". I have noticed that people of your intellect have a habit of
jumping to this "cant you admit you were wrong" argument as if there is some sort of larger moral obligation to respond. This has nothing to do with my pride and everything to do with your inability to follow a conversation.
I'd suggest you get over that while I contemplate how to get over the things in your post that never bothered me in the first place
p.s. Zoner, nothing about my responses has anything to do with "crafting a response", so I will take your interpretation of such as a compliment. It also shows me that if a few hastily typed responses are causing you to get a little dizzy that there may not be a lot of benefit to continuing the discussion any further. I'm just too "simplistic" I guess
you got me big guy. You suuuuuuuure showed me.
The moral of the story here, is if you want to call someone out 1) know what THEY are talking about before you flap your fingers all over the keyboard and 2) know what YOU are talking about. Both of these things could have helped to avoid this derailment.