- Joined
- Aug 2, 2002
- Messages
- 7,629
- Reaction score
- 381
I'm looking into getting a handgun for keeping at home, as well as CCW use when appropriate. I'll tell you what I've fired and what I've been recommended. I was hoping the gun owners in this group could offer some advice as well. Keep in mind I did not shoot a handgun until last weekend at an introductory level course. For the level 2 course I need to have a handgun, holster, and some other things.
I shot a Glock 17 (? -- 9 mm) on day 1. It didn't feel very comfortable, and it was a little hard to retract the slide. The instructor gave me a Springfield 9 mm to fire on the second day. That felt more comfortable and easier to use. I don't know if it was the gun or the fact that I had already shot a bunch of rounds, but I did better on the second day.
One of my colleagues, who had recommended the introductory class to me, recommended getting a Sig Sauer P229 .40 caliber. It feels OK, but that slide is really hard for me to retract. I don't know if this is something I can get used to with practice or not. Anyone else have this same problem?
The guy at the range suggested a Smith and Wesson M&P .40 caliber. They have a 9 mm version that I rent to try on their range. He says the recoil is not much different between the 9 mm and the .40 caliber, but obviously the .40 caliber has better stopping power. Does anyone have any experience with a Smith and Wesson M&P .40 caliber? Advantages/disadvantages? It seems from an internet search that the Smith and Wesson M&P is double action only, where as the Sig Sauer P229 is double action. Does the slightly longer trigger pull with a double action only make a practical difference in rapid firing as compared to a double action handgun?
Do you recommend I look into something else?
Any advice you can give would be appreciated.
No kidding. He should've bought a bunch of magazines for each gun, so he could loan one to a friend. When the zombies come, armed friends are going to be important. You don't want to be sharing your gun's magazines when Zed and his 10 moaning pals are walking up the driveway.
Somethin' wrong with the link in post #18? 😉
I'm looking into getting a handgun...
It didn't feel very comfortable, and it was a little hard to retract the slide.
Does the slightly longer trigger pull with a double action only make a practical difference in rapid firing as compared to a double action handgun
Anyone care to make a rec on a semi auto 40 pistol?
While there are plenty of people out there that do just fine with a DA/SA trigger, I have never liked the change in trigger pull.
The guy at the range suggested a Smith and Wesson M&P .40 caliber. They have a 9 mm version that I rent to try on their range. He says the recoil is not much different between the 9 mm and the .40 caliber, but obviously the .40 caliber has better stopping power. Does anyone have any experience with a Smith and Wesson M&P .40 caliber?
I am new to the gun scene. Where do you all shop for guns? Gun shows? Gander Mountain? Online? Any specific websites? Thanks.
Hi 7starmantis. Thanks for your post. I'm surprised a state like Texas would have such a strange rule. Thankfully nothing like that in TN. Apparently we have to get a certain score to qualify in TN, but that isn't very strict either because I was able to pass on the second day of the class. I didn't even realize it was a test until we got back to the classroom and the instructor said we had all passed the state qualifying test.
As an update a range/gun store owner showed me an easier way to retract the slide on a gun. So that is no longer an issue for me. I subsequently test fired a series of different weapons. It came down to a Springfield XD .40 or a Sig P229. Both really fit my hand well.
My colleague's recommendation had been a Sig P229. The deciding factor for me was the love of the ease of the single action trigger after the first shot.
So I got a Sig P229 a couple of weeks ago and have shot it several times since then and have gotten comfortable with it. It's nice because it came with night sights standard -- my colleague had recommended getting those. My handgun carry permit was waiting for me when I got home yesterday morning. 😀 I had bought a Galco N3 IWB holster about a week ago and wore the gun outside the apartment for the first tiem when I went to a Subway to get dinner. It's funny -- it looked OK in the mirror before I left, but when I was waiting in line I felt like the grip was printing. However, nobody noticed. Probably just jitters over doing an unfamiliar task.
I ordered the nylon Wilderness Instructor's gun belt becaues it is adjustable. My thought process was it would easy to adjust it for use in the winter when I wear thicker/more layers of clothes, rather than getting a different size belt. It is apparently on back order, but should likely ship sometime this week. Once I get the belt, I'm going to take the next level class.
Now to look for a magazine pouch/carrier. I just found out those come in all styles also.
I had bought a Galco N3 IWB holster about a week ago and wore the gun outside the apartment for the first tiem when I went to a Subway to get dinner. It's funny -- it looked OK in the mirror before I left, but when I was waiting in line I felt like the grip was printing. However, nobody noticed. Probably just jitters over doing an unfamiliar task.
ArkansasRanger said:I just found this thread and am sorry I missed it when it first began, but alas I'm not really qualified to be on the anesthesia forum I guess.
*Where do you guys hide it in your scrubs? 😛
Many hospitals specifically prohibit carry on their premises, no exception for CCW permit holders. Anyway, a holster in scrubs is just ridiculous and inappropriate on a bunch of levels. I guess you'd have to be secure enough in your manhood to start wearing a fanny pack. 🙂
One of the stumbling blocks I faced in the insane cluster**** that was my California CCW application was explaining to the issuing authority why I wanted one even though my place of employment prohibited carry. CA's discretionary issue policies usually require a work-related "good cause" declaration. Even though I live in a red part of the state I was surprised they approved my application. Took them most of a year ... but it's CA.
A few people have spoken poorly of the Taurus Judge and rightly so. It is a gimmick gun, kind of a cool gimmick, but still a gimmick.
However, Taurus does deserve a second look. Go to www.taurus.com and look in the concealed carry section for the Millenium Pro 45 cal. IMHO 9mm hasn't enough stopping power. It is a sweet, relatively inexpensive, small, and powerful weapon with a pretty good magazine capacity compared to a typical 1911.
Check it out.
Most hospitals do post the sign preventing the carry of concealed handguns, etc. Technically, that even would prohibit me, when off-duty, from doing so too, but it's concealed so 1) they won't notice and 2) if they call the cops they're just calling people I work with so they're not going to do anything. 😛
While technically the worst that would happen if you carried on private property that prohibited weapons is that you'd be asked to leave ...
... there's enough FUD and fear of CCW among the general populace that we should always try to be above reproach. We're allowed to carry because others respect the Constitution and the law; the least we can do is respect their lawful decision to prohibit weapons on their own property. However misguided they may be. 🙂
Come on down here. We're all for concealed carry. In fact, as a whole with my experience, people with a CHL get a little more respect and street credibility from the cops (including me) if they have their own lawful weapon. I hope we never go towards open carry. That is just weird. I wouldn't do it if it were allowed.
Out here, we have this bizarre open carry activist movement. Since loaded open carry is illegal, and CCW is impossible to obtain in most of the state, there's this pseudo-organized group going around doing unloaded open carry.
They hang out at Starbucks or other places, with unloaded guns. (It's legal to carry ammo with you, but the gun has to be unloaded.) What they want is CCW but they live in counties or cities that refuse to issue permits. So the idea is to draw attention to how arbitrary and ridiculous the CCW discretionary issue policies are. Kind of a loud "hey, I'd love to carry concealed and not freak people out, but these dumb laws only let me carry openly, so here I am, why dontcha change the law, become a shall issue state" ...
Which is crazy. We might get shall-issue through the federal courts after McDonald, but there's no way in hell the state legislature is going to look at these yahoos carrying unloaded guns in Starbucks and suddenly pass gun-friendly legislation.
Got a link? Sounds interesting.I ordered the nylon Wilderness Instructor's gun belt becaues it is adjustable.
Was a little concerned about this myself. Thanks!Everyone who's not a nurse with a shoulder chip is welcome here. 🙂
I'm really thinking about getting a S&W Airweight or something for lighter carrying.I tried to explain that a revolver that can shoot a .410 shotgun shell isn't going to be like his S&W Airweight. 🙄
On the 9mm note, for the average Joe it's probably not a bad concealed carry gun. Bullets are cheaper. The gun is lighter, and you're more likely to carry it. I fondled a Walther PPS 9mm a while back, and I loved it. It'd make a good little pocket gun I think.
I carry a 9mm basically for those exact reasons and my wife has the baby glock so we share ammo. I'm not convinced (but am moving that way) to get a .40 for regular carry. Guess I'm not convinced of the difference in stopping power. Another discussion I'm sure though. Would love to hear some advice on it though.
Given quality ammo, I think once you get past 9mm the caliber debate is mostly moot.
I also think the military - which is obligated to use FMJ rounds - made a mistake going from .45 to 9mm, and THAT segment of the caliber debate is alive and well. But as long as you're carrying a good hollow point, not some $.20/round FMJ paper-punching range round like the cheapo Walmart Winchester White Box, 9mm is fine for a carry gun.
And to go off on another tangent, it's interesting to me that some argue that for small caliber pocket guns (eg .380 out of a Ruger LCP) ball ammo might be better than hollow points, because .380 HPs out of a short barrel may only get you 4-6" of penetration, which isn't enough.
Got a link? Sounds interesting.
Obviously NOT a speed holster, but what do you guys think of this shirt holster? Might solve the scrub question asked earlier (not the legality of carrying in a hospital but the idea of how to conceal).
http://magills.com/pgroup_descrip/3...nt+Shirt+-+FREE+Belly+Band+Offer/?mode=custom
I carry my handgun in my purse. People will pick it up and ask, what are you carrying in there, rocks?
Ammo is heavy!
way too early, I take it you meant to say 😉👍
You anesthesiologists are a good lot, maybe I should reconsider my (way to early) specialty ideas. 😀
I've been seeing a lot of talk about the Sig P229. So, what do you guys like about it above things Glocks?
For me it seemed to fit my hand better than some of the Glocks I tried.
The first trigger pull (unless you decide to manually cock the hammer) is stiff, just like the Glock, but the rest are very light. I like that light trigger pull. I figure that first trigger pull is like a safety of sorts, but if I'm in a situation where I've already pulled the trigger, I want subsequent trigger pulls to be as easy as possible. This not to say there is anything wrong with Glocks. I'm sure if I had bought a Glock I would have adjusted to it. This is just a personal preference. That and I know from my colleague and others that Sigs, just like Glocks, are very reliable.
As others have said, the best safety is the one between our ears. I don't want purchase any gun with a side safety out of concern that I'll forget to flip it in a stressful situation.
Thats interesting I've never shot one. Do you worry at all about the hammer being exposed?
I've never shot the Sigs. I'd like to, but I honestly don't know anyone that owns one. I've never really had the motivation to buy one, however, with the number of federal and military agencies sporting a P229 it's bound to be a good gun. I wouldn't have any hesitation about getting one, yet it's not anywhere near the top of my list of wants, lol. I'm not a fan of the hammers on concealed carry even though people carried guns with hammers for years. It's the same reason I've never invested in a Colt Commander flatty for concealed carry.
I agree with the anesthesiology career choice. They do give the appearance of a fun bunch. I guess it'd be a job to let one get caught up on his reading. 😉
I've been thinking of doing just that, guess I will.The first time I shot a Sig was when I rented one at a range. So if you really want to shoot one, go ahead and rent one.
I think he was addressing the same thing I was attempting to. Having a movable part so integral to function only adds possible problems. There has been a debate for years on hammers on concealed carry (hope I'm not pulling him into something he didn't mean to address) weapons. The hammer can get caught in clothing, jam, etc causing a misfire or no fire. I personally dont like hammered weapons semi-auto or revolver for these reasons but doubt in reality it would cause any real issues. It obviously hasn't for those who carry them. Just a personal choice I guess. Just seems like adding unnecessary risk in my mind, but I'm neurotic 🙂 I've been teaching self defense and survival for the last 10 years.....neurotic.Can you expand on your hammer comment?
I love my career choice, and I think I work with a good bunch of people. My current hospital is resource strapped compared to where I came from, but the people I work with really make it an enjoyable experience.
Thinking of buying the Walther P99 in 9mm. I have thousands of 9mm rounds, and I only punch holes in paper. Currently have a Walther PP (32 auto, so small but incredibly accurate and well built), and a Sig p228. Any personal experiences with the P99? Also interested on thoughts on the new Walther PPS.
The guy at the range suggested a Smith and Wesson M&P .40 caliber. They have a 9 mm version that I rent to try on their range. He says the recoil is not much different between the 9 mm and the .40 caliber, but obviously the .40 caliber has better stopping power. Does anyone have any experience with a Smith and Wesson M&P .40 caliber? Advantages/disadvantages? It seems from an internet search that the Smith and Wesson M&P is double action only, where as the Sig Sauer P229 is double action. Does the slightly longer trigger pull with a double action only make a practical difference in rapid firing as compared to a double action handgun?