I think that's reasonable and still correct. That was my polite way to tell you that you should stop correcting people on that because they're not wrong.
I appreciate the tact...it did make me reconsider, for what it's worth, and will likely factor in the future. I
love discussing common linguistic misconceptions, though...for instance, the incorrect, yet widely presumed story that 'Duck tape' was originally called 'duct tape', but got corrupted because everyone said it wrong/the branding. In fact, it was originally called 'duck tape' due to its water resistant back, is
terrible for ducting work, and eventually became known as 'duct tape' because of mispronunciation/misinformation in the
other direction! Doesn't make duct tape wrong to say, as that is widely accepted now, but it's worth spreading. I feel similarly about 'nauseous', as the concept that we, as a culture, have been using it completely incorrectly for so long that it has become the norm is fascinating. Suddenly all of the other inconsistencies in the English language start to make a lot more sense...
The dictionaries I've looked it up in contained only the 1 definition for nauseous, btw...I did check when I was first told of my own error on that front.
I personally am very glad someone corrected me; I never used nauseous again after that and it's the kind of error I'm very glad to have pointed out...it's interesting, not really insulting as it is a common misconception, and I am glad to have the opportunity to use it correctly.