Has Anyone Injected BMAC into Vertebral Endplates for Modic Changes?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,568
Reaction score
6,968
Int J Mol Sci

. 2020 May 27;21(11):3791.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21113791.

Serum Biomarkers for Connective Tissue and Basement Membrane Remodeling are Associated with Vertebral Endplate Bone Marrow Lesions as Seen on MRI (Modic Changes)​

Stefan Dudli 1, Alexander Ballatori 2, Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen 3, Zachary L McCormick 2, Conor W O'Neill 2, Sibel Demir-Deviren 2, Roland Krug 2, Irina Heggli 1, Astrid Juengel 1, Jaro Karppinen 4 5 6, Florian Brunner 7, Mazda Farshad 8, Oliver Distler 1, Jeffrey C Lotz 2, Aaron J Fields 2
Affiliations expand
Free PMC article

Abstract​

Vertebral endplate bone marrow lesions, visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as Modic changes (MC), are associated with chronic low back pain (cLBP). Since guidelines recommend against routine spinal MRI for cLBP in primary care, MC may be underdiagnosed. Serum biomarkers for MC would allow early diagnosis, inform clinical care decisions, and supplement treatment monitoring. We aimed to discover biomarkers in the blood serum that correlate with MC pathophysiological processes. For this single-site cross-sectional study, we recruited 54 subjects with 38 cLBP patients and 16 volunteers without a history of LBP. All subjects completed an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire and 10-cm Visual Analog Score (VAS) for LBP (VASback) and leg pain. Lumbar T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted MRI were acquired at 3T and used for MC classification in each endplate. Blood serum was collected on the day of MRI. Biomarkers related to disc resorption and bone marrow fibrosis were analyzed with enzyme-linked immune-absorbent assays. The concentration of biomarkers between no MC and any type of MC (AnyMC), MC1, and MC2 were compared. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristics were calculated for each biomarker and for bivariable biomarker models. We found that biomarkers related to type III and type IV collagen degradation and formation tended to correlate with the presence of MC (p = 0.060-0.088). The bivariable model with the highest AUC was PRO-C3 + C4M and had a moderate diagnostic value for AnyMC in cLBP patients (AUC = 0.73, specificity = 78.9%, sensitivity = 73.7%). In conclusion, serum biomarkers related to the formation and degradation of type III and type IV collagen, which are key molecules in bone marrow fibrosis, correlated with MC presence. Bone marrow fibrosis may be an important pathophysiological process in MC that should be targeted in larger biomarker and treatment studies.
Keywords: Modic change; basement membrane; biomarker; bone marrow; connective tissue; disc degeneration; low back pain.

Members don't see this ad.
 
this you should study in a sufficiently powered prospective double blind study to further pain management and to prove that BMAC would be a safe and effective treatment.
 
this you should study in a sufficiently powered prospective double blind study to further pain management and to prove that BMAC would be a safe and effective treatment.

Why? Ortho and NS use BMAC all the time intra-operatively and the data out of France for osteonecrosis is outstanding. Bone is bone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
I posted that case study of intraosseous PRP in VB in another thread. Interesting but very early
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Why? Ortho and NS use BMAC all the time intra-operatively and the data out of France for osteonecrosis is outstanding. Bone is bone.
would want to review their literature.


but.. is the placement of BMAC the primary and only treatment in their operation, like it would be when you are doing an injection?
 
Bunch of different treatments lumped into 10-12 reviewed studies does not make a lot of sense. When starting with 2700+.......
And did they review or exclude the negative study?
 
Top