Hi everyone, I just started studying for the MCAT and had a question concerning studying methods.
I was wondering if it was important that I be able to do complex physics problems based on the equations. I was looking through some of the MCAT practice tests, and found that a lot of it was straight up problems.
I was going to buy a physics text book and work through a lot of the problems in it to refresh my memory (a monumental task), but friends of mine tell me that this is an inefficient waste of time...
Why is it? I'm slightly confused, considering a large portion of the physics section was straight up problems, why would it be wasteful to practice solving these problems?
Also, I was wondering if the MCAT prep courses and book were designed to only target a body of problems that are likely to appear on the test, and not designed to allow you to solve most all of the problems that will appear. Or is the MCAT prep materials usually sufficient to allow you to solve most of the problems??
I was wondering if it was important that I be able to do complex physics problems based on the equations. I was looking through some of the MCAT practice tests, and found that a lot of it was straight up problems.
I was going to buy a physics text book and work through a lot of the problems in it to refresh my memory (a monumental task), but friends of mine tell me that this is an inefficient waste of time...
Why is it? I'm slightly confused, considering a large portion of the physics section was straight up problems, why would it be wasteful to practice solving these problems?
Also, I was wondering if the MCAT prep courses and book were designed to only target a body of problems that are likely to appear on the test, and not designed to allow you to solve most all of the problems that will appear. Or is the MCAT prep materials usually sufficient to allow you to solve most of the problems??