PreMed Student 010111
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 131
Hi Everyone,
I am currently in the fortunate situation where I have been accepted into a couple of schools. I have currently been accepted into UCLA and Texas A&M. I am still waiting to hear if I got into McGovern and UMass Medical; however, I don't know what to think at this point. My partner is in medicine and has been telling me what is really important to look at (match list and cost of attendance). Obviously UCLA has the most competitive match list to not only some of the hardest specialists to match into but to elite institutions (UCSF, Brigham, MGH, Mayo, Stanford, etc).
I feel very blessed to have these opportunities and be put in the station I am, but I am very lost in my train of thought on how to start the process of choosing. My main concern with UCLA is cost and also the location. The average attendance cost is about 350ish and I have only visited LA once before. I am a little less concern about the area, but my partner is worried about the negative aspects (cost is high to live, superficial people, etc). On the other hand Texas A&M is about 200k a year. They also have a unique focus in military medicine which I find interesting but I know that I don't want to be a military physician solely.
Then comes down to the what ifs with McGovern and UMass. McGovern in my opinion might be a little better than Texas A&M just due to location and resources available in the TMC. I was WL there but I am also OOS. I heard back from A&M after being WL for a week, so I am hopeful that they just haven't sent those yet/concerned their OOS applicants. Then UMass medical would be the most convent for me and my partner. I don't have family but my partner works in Boston and has family there. I don't necessarily want to live in Worcester but I know UMass has a great reputation and good connection into some of the elite institutions. UMass would also be more expensive because I would be OOS even though I lived here for 5+ years (requires 7 years to be a resident).
My thought process is if UMass and UCLA are the same cost then UCLA would be the best choice. Then if I got into McGovern, that would be higher than Texas A&M. UCLA vs McGovern, I am not sure what I would choose. UCLA is also all pass fail while McGovern isn't which is interesting and I don't know how to feel. Any help would be great.
I am currently in the fortunate situation where I have been accepted into a couple of schools. I have currently been accepted into UCLA and Texas A&M. I am still waiting to hear if I got into McGovern and UMass Medical; however, I don't know what to think at this point. My partner is in medicine and has been telling me what is really important to look at (match list and cost of attendance). Obviously UCLA has the most competitive match list to not only some of the hardest specialists to match into but to elite institutions (UCSF, Brigham, MGH, Mayo, Stanford, etc).
I feel very blessed to have these opportunities and be put in the station I am, but I am very lost in my train of thought on how to start the process of choosing. My main concern with UCLA is cost and also the location. The average attendance cost is about 350ish and I have only visited LA once before. I am a little less concern about the area, but my partner is worried about the negative aspects (cost is high to live, superficial people, etc). On the other hand Texas A&M is about 200k a year. They also have a unique focus in military medicine which I find interesting but I know that I don't want to be a military physician solely.
Then comes down to the what ifs with McGovern and UMass. McGovern in my opinion might be a little better than Texas A&M just due to location and resources available in the TMC. I was WL there but I am also OOS. I heard back from A&M after being WL for a week, so I am hopeful that they just haven't sent those yet/concerned their OOS applicants. Then UMass medical would be the most convent for me and my partner. I don't have family but my partner works in Boston and has family there. I don't necessarily want to live in Worcester but I know UMass has a great reputation and good connection into some of the elite institutions. UMass would also be more expensive because I would be OOS even though I lived here for 5+ years (requires 7 years to be a resident).
My thought process is if UMass and UCLA are the same cost then UCLA would be the best choice. Then if I got into McGovern, that would be higher than Texas A&M. UCLA vs McGovern, I am not sure what I would choose. UCLA is also all pass fail while McGovern isn't which is interesting and I don't know how to feel. Any help would be great.