The only assumption you admitted to was that you made no transcribing errors, an assumption that you quickly refuted in your next sentence.
So basically you're saying there is absolutely no way you reasoned incorrectly on an analogy and no possible way you misinterpreted a sentence completion because you went back and checked them all. Is there no way you mistakenly interpreted an analogy or sentence completion incorrectly and used the same fallacious reasoning when you went back to check your answers again? Sorry, but I don't buy it.
The fact is you don't know for sure that you missed only one question, yet for some reason, you continue to confuse estimation with absolute 100% certainty.
Wow, that is exactly the point I was trying to help you understand. If you go back and change all your posts from 100% sure to fairly sure, then I have no problem with anything you've written.
My eyes were open and my mouth was shut the entire time I made my post and read all of yours, but thanks for the advice.