Hopkins, Goucher, Bryn Mawr, Scripps: med school admissions comparison

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

henge

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
248
Reaction score
9
ADMISSION TO MED SCHOOL. Hopkins, Goucher, Bryn Mawr or Scripps will all get you into med school. According to the Hopkins post-bacc Facebook page, 100% of Hopkins students who applied last year got into med school, and, according to the official Hopkins site, over the history of the program “virtually all” who have applied have gotten in. Goucher states that 99.7% of its students who applied have gotten in over the last 10 years. BM says that consistently over 98% of its applicants are accepted. Scripps states that in the last 4 years 100% of its students have gotten into med school, and that over the long term, well over 90% have been accepted. I believe in each case these percentages are limited to students who actually apply, and thus exclude students who dropped out of the program or chose not to apply to med school (more on this below).

Bottom Line: If you finish the program and apply to med school, Hopkins, Goucher, Bryn Mawr, or Scripps will almost certainly get you into a med school.

ADMISSION TO HIGHLY-RANKED MED SCHOOLS. Hopkins and Goucher offer their students the best shot at getting into a highly ranked med schools. For this analysis, I used the USNWR rankings for research med schools, and treated top 25 schools as highly ranked. Obviously, using 25 as the cut-off is arbitrary, and, equally obviously, there are serious questions about the value of the rankings in USNWR (or any rankings, for that matter). Still, the rankings probably bear at least some relation to reputation and seem to have a pretty strong relationship to selectivity, as measured by average MCAT score, so I don't think they are worthless.

The tables below show the average percentage of students in a post-bacc class who received offers from the specified med school, generally limiting the presentation to top 25 schools that made offers to at least 5% of the students in a program. Again, I understand there are limits to what this can reliably show; i.e., students more interested in going to a top 25 may be drawn to Hopkins or Goucher instead of BM or Scripps; students from Hopkins and Goucher may feel more of a need to 'stack' offers than do students from BM or Scripps; BM students, being more numerous, may spread out their applications more, etc. Still, consider: If you knew nothing about two programs except for the percentage of students at each program who got offers from top 25 programs, which program would you go to if your main objective was to go to a top 25 program?

I derived this percentage by dividing (i) the number of offers made by a particular med school to students of a particular post-bacc, by (ii) the average number of students who matriculated into the post-bacc program as reported on the program's website (not the number who applied to med school from the post-bacc program). Hopkins and BM present 5 years of acceptance data on their web sites. Goucher presents only 1 year of acceptance data on its website, so I used the Wayback Machine to pull up Goucher data from 2007-2009, giving me 4 years of data. Scripps' data is problematic because when a med school has accepted more than 1 Scripps' student, it is impossible to tell how many students (if any) were accepted within the last 5 years. UCSF and UCSD are the only top 25s to have made more than 1 offer to Scripps' students, having made offers to 3 and 6 students, respectively. In addition, Scripps offers part-time enrollment and pre-vet/pre-dental, so not all students will apply each year to med school. I fudged these problems by assuming half of the acceptances from UCSF and UCSD came in the last 5 years (which seems reasonable since, for offers the date of which can be ascertained, only 22 of 50 came in the last 5 years), and by assuming 12 students per year, which is at the low end of the 12-15 range mentioned on the Scripps web site.

Here is the percentage of students entering a specified post-bacc program who received an offer from a specified med school, with parenthetical information about linkage:

Hopkins:
Top 25, Northeast:
JHU 17%; Penn 12% (has link); Cornell 10% (has link); Harvard 7%; Mt Sinai 7% (has new link)
Top 25, Other:
UMich 13% (has new link); Pitt 7%; Emory 7%; Duke 6%; NW 7%; WUSL 5%; UChi 5%
Other noteworthy:
GWU: 9%; Brown 9% (has link not requiring MCAT, non-trads preferred); Rochester 7% (has link not requiring MCAT)

Goucher:
Top 25, Northeast:
JHU 12%; Cornell 10%; Harvard 6%; Mt Sinai 6%; Penn: 5%
Top 25: Other
UChi 19% (has link); Pitt 13% (0 in 2010); UMich 6% (has new link)
Other Noteworthy:
UMd 28% (65%, in 2010 new link); GWU 10%; Brown 6% (has link not requiring MCAT, non-trads preferred)

BM:
Top 25, Northeast:
Penn 10% (has link)
Other Noteworthy:
Rochester 14% (has link not requiring MCAT); Thos Jefferson 12% (has link); Brown 7% (has link not requiring MCAT, non-trads preferred); Dartmouth 5% (has link not requiring MCAT)

Scripps:
Top 25:
UCSD: 5%
Other Noteworthy:
UCSF: 2.5%
GWU: 8%

As an alternative, consider the total number of offers made by top 25s per student at each post-bacc. Here is the data, which, to account for limitations in data, considers offers only from med schools that made at least 3 offers to students from Goucher, Hopkins and BM (even though BM is much larger), or 1 offer for Scripps (which is smallest).

Hopkins:
.67 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.58 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

Goucher:
.48 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.69 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

BM:
.25 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.25 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

Scripps:
.05 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.14 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

Bottom Line: When it comes to getting accepted into a top 25, Hopkins and Goucher have the best results, and those results are very similar. As a bonus, Hopkins has links to three top 25 Northeast schools, while Goucher has an extremely strong relationship with UMd, a top 40 school, which offered 65% of Goucher students enrollment in 2010. BM's link with Penn is a plus. Scripps has decent ties to the UCs. BM, Hopkins and Goucher all have no-MCAT-required links (3,2 and 1 links, respectively).

ATTRITION.
As suggested above, the acceptance percentages don't tell the whole story since they do not address the number of students who drop out before applying or complete the program but decide not to apply. Attrition is a factor to consider, but you will find it hard to get decent information on this, especially since these programs are small and the actions of a few individuals can make big percentage differences.

Consider that, on the one hand, a poster recently said Goucher had 4 students drop out last year, and a larger than usual number decided to take 2 year glides, so only 22 students, out of 31+ original students, actually applied to med school (though the way linkages are report also influenced this). In a PM, a recent Hopkins student believed that in a recent year 6 out of roughly 28 students either dropped or decided not to apply, while in the current year there has been little or no attrition. Scripps 'gainful employment' disclosure indicates only 8 students finished the program last year, and only 7 did so on time; this, for a program with a typical entering class of 12-15. On the other hand, based on SD posts, PMs and direct communications with programs, it appears attrition at Hopkins, Goucher, BM and Scripps is usually much lower than the above figures would suggest.

Complicating matters even more is the absence of public information on the characteristics of those who drop and their reasons for dropping. There is some indication that non-trad students are more likely to drop than are students direct from undergrad, though that might not be true all the time. A high drop rate would suggest serious problems with the program, but in fact might shed little light on the program, depending on the (typically unknown) motivation of the dropper: It is not worrisome if students drop because of personal reasons--a spouse's job requires relocation, a parent falls ill and needs attention--but it is definitely worrisome if students drop because they hate the program.

Bottom Line: There is no good public data on attrition, including average drop out rates, typical 'two-year glide' rates, the reasons for drops, and the characteristics of which students drop.

DISCLOSURE: One-third of Henge (who actually is a composite of 3 individuals) will enroll in the Hopkins post-bacc next summer.
 
Thanks for all this, appreciate it 🙂

Just to note, none of these programs are for traditional science students right? All are for non-trads?
 
Right. They are for people--career changers or late deciders--who have completed less than half of the med school science pre-reqs.
 
FYI: As of this year Goucher has 2 no-MCAT-required links.

Also take into consideration for Goucher that with the link to Maryland, students linking can all gain in-state status the year before while they are at Goucher.
 
Thanks for the update on linkage. What is the second no-MCAT link (aside from Brown)?
 
Very good info for non-trads .....I am a traditional student with a Bio degree. Do they have anything for trads that's this promising into top schools? Just wondering I know there are SMPs but I wanna prepare myself for something good as a back up in case I don't get into smps .....

Thanks 🙂
 
Sorry, I haven't looked into SMPs. There are other threads that discuss the big SMPs like (I think) Georgetown, BU. etc.
 
U Chicago. Although their MCAT arrangement has changed in the past (at least to my knowledge) so I'm not sure this is the situation for this year (but it was last year).
 
Interesting, how are you determining what med schools are giving offers to people from various postbacs? From self-reported data? Also, your data is definitely not 100% accurate vis a vis Scripps, as at least one person (if not several) have linked to Pittsburgh, which is a top 25 school, and various other people (myself included) have multiple top 25 acceptances. Are you just talking about where people are matriculating?

ADMISSION TO MED SCHOOL. Hopkins, Goucher, Bryn Mawr or Scripps will all get you into med school. According to the Hopkins post-bacc Facebook page, 100% of Hopkins students who applied last year got into med school, and, according to the official Hopkins site, over the history of the program “virtually all” who have applied have gotten in. Goucher states that 99.7% of its students who applied have gotten in over the last 10 years. BM says that consistently over 98% of its applicants are accepted. Scripps states that in the last 4 years 100% of its students have gotten into med school, and that over the long term, well over 90% have been accepted. I believe in each case these percentages are limited to students who actually apply, and thus exclude students who dropped out of the program or chose not to apply to med school (more on this below).

Bottom Line: If you finish the program and apply to med school, Hopkins, Goucher, Bryn Mawr, or Scripps will almost certainly get you into a med school.

ADMISSION TO HIGHLY-RANKED MED SCHOOLS. Hopkins and Goucher offer their students the best shot at getting into a highly ranked med schools. For this analysis, I used the USNWR rankings for research med schools, and treated top 25 schools as highly ranked. Obviously, using 25 as the cut-off is arbitrary, and, equally obviously, there are serious questions about the value of the rankings in USNWR (or any rankings, for that matter). Still, the rankings probably bear at least some relation to reputation and seem to have a pretty strong relationship to selectivity, as measured by average MCAT score, so I don't think they are worthless.

The tables below show the average percentage of students in a post-bacc class who received offers from the specified med school, generally limiting the presentation to top 25 schools that made offers to at least 5% of the students in a program. Again, I understand there are limits to what this can reliably show; i.e., students more interested in going to a top 25 may be drawn to Hopkins or Goucher instead of BM or Scripps; students from Hopkins and Goucher may feel more of a need to 'stack' offers than do students from BM or Scripps; BM students, being more numerous, may spread out their applications more, etc. Still, consider: If you knew nothing about two programs except for the percentage of students at each program who got offers from top 25 programs, which program would you go to if your main objective was to go to a top 25 program?

I derived this percentage by dividing (i) the number of offers made by a particular med school to students of a particular post-bacc, by (ii) the average number of students who matriculated into the post-bacc program as reported on the program's website (not the number who applied to med school from the post-bacc program). Hopkins and BM present 5 years of acceptance data on their web sites. Goucher presents only 1 year of acceptance data on its website, so I used the Wayback Machine to pull up Goucher data from 2007-2009, giving me 4 years of data. Scripps' data is problematic because when a med school has accepted more than 1 Scripps' student, it is impossible to tell how many students (if any) were accepted within the last 5 years. UCSF and UCSD are the only top 25s to have made more than 1 offer to Scripps' students, having made offers to 3 and 6 students, respectively. In addition, Scripps offers part-time enrollment and pre-vet/pre-dental, so not all students will apply each year to med school. I fudged these problems by assuming half of the acceptances from UCSF and UCSD came in the last 5 years (which seems reasonable since, for offers the date of which can be ascertained, only 22 of 50 came in the last 5 years), and by assuming 12 students per year, which is at the low end of the 12-15 range mentioned on the Scripps web site.

Here is the percentage of students entering a specified post-bacc program who received an offer from a specified med school, with parenthetical information about linkage:

Hopkins:
Top 25, Northeast:
JHU 17%; Penn 12% (has link); Cornell 10% (has link); Harvard 7%; Mt Sinai 7% (has new link)
Top 25, Other:
UMich 13% (has new link); Pitt 7%; Emory 7%; Duke 6%; NW 7%; WUSL 5%; UChi 5%
Other noteworthy:
GWU: 9%; Brown 9% (has link not requiring MCAT, non-trads preferred); Rochester 7% (has link not requiring MCAT)

Goucher:
Top 25, Northeast:
JHU 12%; Cornell 10%; Harvard 6%; Mt Sinai 6%; Penn: 5%
Top 25: Other
UChi 19% (has link); Pitt 13% (0 in 2010); UMich 6% (has new link)
Other Noteworthy:
UMd 28% (65%, in 2010 new link); GWU 10%; Brown 6% (has link not requiring MCAT, non-trads preferred)

BM:
Top 25, Northeast:
Penn 10% (has link)
Other Noteworthy:
Rochester 14% (has link not requiring MCAT); Thos Jefferson 12% (has link); Brown 7% (has link not requiring MCAT, non-trads preferred); Dartmouth 5% (has link not requiring MCAT)

Scripps:
Top 25:
UCSD: 5%
Other Noteworthy:
UCSF: 2.5%
GWU: 8%

As an alternative, consider the total number of offers made by top 25s per student at each post-bacc. Here is the data, which, to account for limitations in data, considers offers only from med schools that made at least 3 offers to students from Goucher, Hopkins and BM (even though BM is much larger), or 1 offer for Scripps (which is smallest).

Hopkins:
.67 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.58 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

Goucher:
.48 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.69 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

BM:
.25 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.25 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

Scripps:
.05 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast
.14 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast

Bottom Line: When it comes to getting accepted into a top 25, Hopkins and Goucher have the best results, and those results are very similar. As a bonus, Hopkins has links to three top 25 Northeast schools, while Goucher has an extremely strong relationship with UMd, a top 40 school, which offered 65% of Goucher students enrollment in 2010. BM's link with Penn is a plus. Scripps has decent ties to the UCs. BM, Hopkins and Goucher all have no-MCAT-required links (3,2 and 1 links, respectively).

ATTRITION.
As suggested above, the acceptance percentages don't tell the whole story since they do not address the number of students who drop out before applying or complete the program but decide not to apply. Attrition is a factor to consider, but you will find it hard to get decent information on this, especially since these programs are small and the actions of a few individuals can make big percentage differences.

Consider that, on the one hand, a poster recently said Goucher had 4 students drop out last year, and a larger than usual number decided to take 2 year glides, so only 22 students, out of 31+ original students, actually applied to med school (though the way linkages are report also influenced this). In a PM, a recent Hopkins student believed that in a recent year 6 out of roughly 28 students either dropped or decided not to apply, while in the current year there has been little or no attrition. Scripps 'gainful employment' disclosure indicates only 8 students finished the program last year, and only 7 did so on time; this, for a program with a typical entering class of 12-15. On the other hand, based on SD posts, PMs and direct communications with programs, it appears attrition at Hopkins, Goucher, BM and Scripps is usually much lower than the above figures would suggest.

Complicating matters even more is the absence of public information on the characteristics of those who drop and their reasons for dropping. There is some indication that non-trad students are more likely to drop than are students direct from undergrad, though that might not be true all the time. A high drop rate would suggest serious problems with the program, but in fact might shed little light on the program, depending on the (typically unknown) motivation of the dropper: It is not worrisome if students drop because of personal reasons--a spouse's job requires relocation, a parent falls ill and needs attention--but it is definitely worrisome if students drop because they hate the program.

Bottom Line: There is no good public data on attrition, including average drop out rates, typical 'two-year glide' rates, the reasons for drops, and the characteristics of which students drop.

DISCLOSURE: One-third of Henge (who actually is a composite of 3 individuals) will enroll in the Hopkins post-bacc next summer.
 
Drzzt,

I think you may be looking only at the first set of comparisons under the major heading "Admissions to Highly-Ranked Med Schools." Those comparisons generally list only med schools which made offers to at least 5% of the students in a post-bacc program. This was intended not just to show chances for a top 25, but also to show which med schools have strong ties to a particular post-bacc program.

A little below that analysis, after the paragraph starting "As an alternative, consider the total number of offers made by top 25s per student at each post-bacc", I listed the aggregate number of offers made by all top 25s to students in a post-bacc divided by the number of students in that post-bacc. This analysis takes into account offers made by schools which did not make offers to at least 5% of the students in a post-bacc. This analysis shows Scripps' students received, on average, .05 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast and .14 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast.

I included Pitt as a non-Northeast (my judgment call--maybe I should have used the term North Atlantic Coast), and, while I did not discuss all linkages for the programs, perhaps I should have noted the Scripps link to Pitt. The linkage stuff is a little difficult to handle, since linkages change from year to year.

The data is for acceptance/offer and does not generally discuss matriculation. The data came from the web sites for the programs, and I have no idea what they based it on. As noted on the post, the Scripps data was the hardest to work with. Here are the web sources:

Hopkins:
"Chart Listing Medical School Acceptances, Johns Hopkins Post-Bac Program, 2007-2011 (last five years), at least three acceptances at each school (44 other schools offered at least one acceptance)"
http://web.jhu.edu/post_bac/med_school/where/

Goucher:
"The 22 Goucher post-bacs who applied in the 2010-2011 application cycle had excellent outcomes."
http://www.goucher.edu/x15659.xml
and the Wayback Machine
"The medical school entering classes of '07 through '09 were accepted at the following institutions."
http://web.archive.org/web/20101212051656/http://goucher.edu/x15659.xml

BM:
"The following table provides information about where postbacs were admitted over a five year period from the fall of 2007 through the fall of 2011 ...* indicates medical schools where postbacs have matriculated"
http://www.brynmawr.edu/postbac/program_facts_matriculation.shtml

Scripps:
"The following medical and health professional schools have accepted our students, and the list is growing"
http://www.scrippscollege.edu/academics/postbac/becoming-doctor.php
 
I don't think the Scripps data is that accurate. The new program director came on after I matriculated to med school so I am not sure she's aware of the outcomes people have. In my class, I know while a good portion of the class (~6-7 people) ended up linking to GWU, the other students ended up going to various schools in CA and the NE, I believe NYU, one to UCSD, two to USC, and a few others went to Western. I had 16 acceptances including 6 of the top 10, and I know I didn't bother updating them with all of the schools I ended up being accepted with, there wasn't any follow-up, I'm sure a lot of the people in my class were the same way. Later all they asked was where I was attending school.

In any case, self-reported data is going to be difficult to analyze. All I can tell you about the program was that directors of admission and faculty at top 10 programs that I interviewed at (including Harvard, Michigan, Columbia, Yale, Stanford, UCSF, etc) all knew about the program and were very aware of its strong reputation.

In any case, the biggest factor here is self-selection, because most Scripps students are very focused on staying in CA, if they're not choosing to link. Considering half the class typically links which means only 6 or so people are applying into the open pool per year, the data is going to look skewed in terms of the open pool applicants. The people that DO end up applying open pool tend to do very well, in my experience. That being said, a lot of them focus on CA and would rather go there than a top tier east coast program.

Drzzt,

I think you may be looking only at the first set of comparisons under the major heading "Admissions to Highly-Ranked Med Schools." Those comparisons generally list only med schools which made offers to at least 5% of the students in a post-bacc program. This was intended not just to show chances for a top 25, but also to show which med schools have strong ties to a particular post-bacc program.

A little below that analysis, after the paragraph starting "As an alternative, consider the total number of offers made by top 25s per student at each post-bacc", I listed the aggregate number of offers made by all top 25s to students in a post-bacc divided by the number of students in that post-bacc. This analysis takes into account offers made by schools which did not make offers to at least 5% of the students in a post-bacc. This analysis shows Scripps' students received, on average, .05 offers/student from top 25s in the Northeast and .14 offers/student from top 25s not in the Northeast.

I included Pitt as a non-Northeast (my judgment call--maybe I should have used the term North Atlantic Coast), and, while I did not discuss all linkages for the programs, perhaps I should have noted the Scripps link to Pitt. The linkage stuff is a little difficult to handle, since linkages change from year to year.

The data is for acceptance/offer and does not generally discuss matriculation. The data came from the web sites for the programs, and I have no idea what they based it on. As noted on the post, the Scripps data was the hardest to work with. Here are the web sources:

Hopkins:
"Chart Listing Medical School Acceptances, Johns Hopkins Post-Bac Program, 2007-2011 (last five years), at least three acceptances at each school (44 other schools offered at least one acceptance)"
http://web.jhu.edu/post_bac/med_school/where/

Goucher:
"The 22 Goucher post-bacs who applied in the 2010-2011 application cycle had excellent outcomes."
http://www.goucher.edu/x15659.xml
and the Wayback Machine
"The medical school entering classes of '07 through '09 were accepted at the following institutions."
http://web.archive.org/web/20101212051656/http://goucher.edu/x15659.xml

BM:
"The following table provides information about where postbacs were admitted over a five year period from the fall of 2007 through the fall of 2011 ...* indicates medical schools where postbacs have matriculated"
http://www.brynmawr.edu/postbac/program_facts_matriculation.shtml

Scripps:
"The following medical and health professional schools have accepted our students, and the list is growing"
http://www.scrippscollege.edu/academics/postbac/becoming-doctor.php
 
Drizzt,

Thanks for the info on Scripps. I certainly meant no disrespect to Scripps, and was just trying to put on one post, in a standardized format, all of the publicly available med school admissions data for Hopkins, Goucher, BM and Scripps. It helps to have additional information to flesh out the gaps in the numbers.

My post's emphasis on northeast med schools was based on my personal interests and I can understand how students attending a California post-bacc might be more interested in staying in California than attending a top 25 in the frigid northeast and how that could affect the analysis.

Unless the programs have entered into with all med schools agreements giving them direct access to offer data (which seems unlikely), it seems the admissions data presented on the program websites would have to be based on students' self-reporting, which is subject to the problems of incomplete reporting that you suggest. I have no way of knowing for sure whether some programs are more diligent than others in their efforts to follow up on their grads' admissions. Based solely on their presentations on the web sites, it does appear that Hopkins, Goucher and BM believe it is important to present detailed admissions data, so it might follow that they are more diligent in obtaining that data. Since I like data sets with an 'n' larger than 1, that is, to my way of thinking, a good thing, but it obviously does not directly bear on how their students did in the admissions cycle.

It seems that, due to under-reporting by students, the data posted on the web sites could underestimate admissions, and the degree of such underestimation could vary among the programs.

Drizzt, did you encounter anything that would lead you to believe that acceptances were ever overstated? Did students ever report more offers than they had?
 
It is my understanding that BM, Goucher, and JHU have a more formal process to report what schools you were accepted to. I chatted with my program coordinator (who is again not the current person in charge of the program) informally a few times to update her on how things were going, but I certainly never provided a list of all the schools I was accepted to and I'm sure that's true of everyone else as well. I have a feeling the list on the Scripps site is matriculation, as I was asked after the fact where I went, and also, about 5-6 people a year go to GWU so the fact that the site lists 9 is way underreported, the data is probably only from the last two years or whatever. I don't think people overreport, but who knows. It certainly could be possible that it happens.

Drizzt,

Thanks for the info on Scripps. I certainly meant no disrespect to Scripps, and was just trying to put on one post, in a standardized format, all of the publicly available med school admissions data for Hopkins, Goucher, BM and Scripps. It helps to have additional information to flesh out the gaps in the numbers.

My post's emphasis on northeast med schools was based on my personal interests and I can understand how students attending a California post-bacc might be more interested in staying in California than attending a top 25 in the frigid northeast and how that could affect the analysis.

Unless the programs have entered into with all med schools agreements giving them direct access to offer data (which seems unlikely), it seems the admissions data presented on the program websites would have to be based on students' self-reporting, which is subject to the problems of incomplete reporting that you suggest. I have no way of knowing for sure whether some programs are more diligent than others in their efforts to follow up on their grads' admissions. Based solely on their presentations on the web sites, it does appear that Hopkins, Goucher and BM believe it is important to present detailed admissions data, so it might follow that they are more diligent in obtaining that data. Since I like data sets with an 'n' larger than 1, that is, to my way of thinking, a good thing, but it obviously does not directly bear on how their students did in the admissions cycle.

It seems that, due to under-reporting by students, the data posted on the web sites could underestimate admissions, and the degree of such underestimation could vary among the programs.

Drizzt, did you encounter anything that would lead you to believe that acceptances were ever overstated? Did students ever report more offers than they had?
 
Drizzt,

Thanks again for the input. Based on what you're saying, the GWU number looks low regardless of whether it purports to represent matriculation or acceptance, and is especially odd since a big chunk of the GWU acceptances would be thru the link, which it seems Scripps would have to know about.
 
I have also been in the Scripps post-bacc program and I believe the data is not accurate. 100% acceptance is misleading - it can take several tries for someone to gain acceptance into medical school. I also firmly believe that any success someone has is due to their hard work, it has nothing to do with the Scripps program. The current director has no experience in medical school admissions, works very part-time, and has only been in the position for 2 years. Google is a much better resource.
From what I have heard, the quality of the program was much better with the previous director (perhaps who Drizzt had), but I would not recommend the program to anyone knowing what I know now. The quality of instruction is also very poor - three of my professors had never taught before - the post-bacc directors have no problem placing students into a class with a professor they know nothing about - it is utter luck of the draw. You can be working as hard as the other post-baccs, but your grade will not be the same due to grading differences and teaching style (ie some ochem professors dropping the lowest test grade while another does not).

All in all, the Scripps acceptance data seems WAY too high for me. Attrition is not good - 4 out of the 15 in my class dropped out - not an insignificant #. If you have choices, go to Hopkins or Goucher.
 
Top