It’s near impossible to have a civil discussion when you have select individuals acting in a toxic manner, especially when they are not participating in good faith to consider an actual exchange of ideas. One of the prerequisites to having any type of debate is for the participants to acknowledge valid points from all parties and to reassess their stance based on facts. Some of these individuals have clearly abandoned these tenets and instead are making personal attacks or focused on rage and emotion.
But the bigger problem with this forum is its nature that rewards individuals gifted in the art of arguing in bad faith. If such a toxic individual wants to join a conversation and ruin the conversation, they are rewarded for their ability to circumvent bans and warnings because they are clever at going about it, whereas the average poster responding to the bad faith arguments will almost certainly get banned because they are not as experienced in the art of toxic, bad faith debating. You can’t “win” an argument if you can’t respond since your account got banned while the instigator is laughing in the corner because they knew how to game the system. You can see this in recent posts where someone seemingly makes an innocent statement then leaves a snide comment at the bottom in an attempt to bait an inflammatory response resulting in a ban.
I have been on this forum for many years and I have seen extremely productive, helpful, contributing members receive warnings and bans largely because they aren’t sly enough to respond to toxicity in a “professional,” manner. It is difficult to blame many of them, because they grew up in older times where computers weren’t as advanced and toxic behavior had to be done face to face, leaving their skills at dealing with these (literally) master baiters subpar. The trends of this board have ultimately diluted the good blood in the community, leaving an increasing amount of toxic members who truly bring nothing positive to the forum.