How are you reading......cautiously??

[BoneNibbler]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Okay so i fooled you into cliking on my thread.

But heres the question. For those of you using FA, RR path, BRS physio.

How are you reading it.....all of FA then all of RR path, etc...

or are you reading FA neuro physio-->BRs neuro physio..etc???

Also why of which way?

 

[DF38]

I'm not doing either of those.

First I'm reading all of BRS physio. Then I'm going to read all of the physio sections in FA. Then I'm going to read all of RR path. And then I'll read all the path sections in FA.

And why? First of all, I decided not to do a systems-based approach. The main reason was because I just didn't like it, but I also thought it would be more of a pain in the ass to do. I figured it was easier to read one whole book at a time then go flipping around looking for stuff in multiple books. And for a systems approach where do you put topics like cell injury/inflammation, cancer, nutrition, heme/onc, etc? I decided it was just easier to not to do that way.

And I'm reading BRS/RR before reading FA because I feel like I will get more out of FA if I have recently read the other resources and some of the details that FA skimps on are more fresh in my mind. That way FA will be more like a review, and I can add notes to FA if I need to clarify anything in there.

 

[BoneNibbler]

I'm not doing either of those.

First I'm reading all of BRS physio. Then I'm going to read all of the physio sections in FA. Then I'm going to read all of RR path. And then I'll read all the path sections in FA.

And why? First of all, I decided not to do a systems-based approach. The main reason was because I just didn't like it, but I also thought it would be more of a pain in the ass to do. I figured it was easier to read one whole book at a time then go flipping around looking for stuff in multiple books. And for a systems approach where do you put topics like cell injury/inflammation, cancer, nutrition, heme/onc, etc? I decided it was just easier to not to do that way.

And I'm reading BRS/RR before reading FA because I feel like I will get more out of FA if I have recently read the other resources and some of the details that FA skimps on are more fresh in my mind. That way FA will be more like a review, and I can add notes to FA if I need to clarify anything in there.

Excellent post. I think this way I will do also. I never thought about this one. THank you mr-evil-eye-kool-aid-guy!!👍

 

[rahulb]

i read RR path once and made notes in it. then i read kaplan lecture notes micro/immuno/biochem/pharm.

i just bought first aid 2009 and just started working my way through that. i'm hoping to do 1st aid and RR path 2 more times before my step1 at the end of may.