- Joined
- Jan 15, 2015
- Messages
- 3,378
- Reaction score
- 4,619
The common thought is that MD schools, with some notable exceptions, generally don't care about your graduate GPA very much unless it's an SMP. Are DO schools the same?
The common thought is that MD schools, with some notable exceptions, generally don't care about your graduate GPA very much unless it's an SMP. Are DO schools the same?
I think for graduate degrees they really care more about the applications of the degree. so if you have a masters in sciences they would hope to see some publications or something more quantifiable than graduate GPAs that tend to be highly non-standardized and often highly inflated. that's what it seems like when talking to PHD students so I assume its pretty similar for MD/DO. a good way to look at graduate work is as "extracurriculars".
Hope so. MS BioEng here, and I find the general dismissal of the degrees (benefit of experience and GPA) as somewhat sad.
The general wisdoms within graduate programs (that I've heard -- NOT the med school adcom perspective) is not so much "GPA is inflated", but "GPA doesn't matter". I'd say a B was relatively easy to get (no harder than undergrad), but an A was still challenging. I didnt see massive grade inflation, just a diminished emphasis on grades. 3 grad classes while spending 30 hours in the lab was a heck of a lot more work than my undergrad. Oh well...
I've been working my butt off, that's all I know. My grad classes are just undergrad classes with extra assignments and/or more difficult tests. Literally, there are undergrads in the classes with me, they just don't have to read as much or any primary lit or write the research papers, and often my exams will contain extra questions related to research methods and such.
Not all but most MD schools do feel that way.
I would think DO schools would be generally more forgiving.
The common thought is that MD schools, with some notable exceptions, generally don't care about your graduate GPA very much unless it's an SMP. Are DO schools the same?
After I got rejected, I met with the dean of admissions at my undergrad school (the school that rejected me). This was an option for anyone who got rejected after an interview, and since it was my undergrad I figured I'd take advantage as I lived in town. The Dean told me directly that they DO look at graduate degrees and they are looked at favorably. BUT, as people have said so far, it has to be in a hard science., preferably a SMP of some sort in which the classes are specifically geared toward medical school, or are taken alongside medical students. For instance he told me straight up that a Masters in Public Health holds no weight. He mentioned the TCMC MBS program, and long story short I went and got into a few schools after that. So It depends on what classes you took as opposed to the degree, and how you performed of course. you have to sell that you can handle a medical school curriculum, which is tough to do unless the degree was geared as such
Selfishly, I just hope they don't generalize too much. Some grad degrees are less intense, but only appreciating a "premed 2.0" SMP degree just seems like an opposite extreme.
I would say my M.S. was a lot easier than my B.S. but my M.S. wasn't in the hard sciences and my B.S. program was VERY difficult, often kicked people out, had people leaving regularly, etc. I did take two graduate level science courses that were probably the most difficult, exam-wise, in terms of coursework. I would not say that my program inflated grades but it was easier in the sense that many of the classes required less studying and more paper writing. My GPA was ALWAYS better in the non-sciences and I always put very little work into any non-science courses comparatively so I would expect to find my M.S. program easier.
That being said, I have heard that graduate degrees do not really hold much weight---it might help in the slightest but it's not like it will hinder you or anything. Mine was free and I don't even use it so I don't even care.