- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 0
I've always been curious... what do comm majors do with their degree?
My only comm major friend works in marketing for a brewery = unlimited free beer = comm majors are good friends to have!
I've always been curious... what do comm majors do with their degree?
My only comm major friend works in marketing for a brewery = unlimited free beer = comm majors are good friends to have!
In my opinion I don't see why you would worry about something like that. Constantly comparing yourself to other people isn't going to do wonders for your self-conscious 😎 That being said, it IS extremely hard to do, and the people that are able to do it are very hard workers and more likely good test takers that don't need much time in advance to prepare for difficult tests. Don't worry about it bro 👍
I agree with the test taking part. But there is the hard work and organization aspect to it as well. I would have a 4.0 easily if it was about tests. The only classes I haven't gotten As in we're classes that had homework that counted, mainly because I forget assignments. I know the material and know it well enough to get an A on every test, it's just classes that have weekly homework that I forget... Amazing how forgetting a few assignments can take you to an A- or B rather quickly.
That should be the easiest part dude. What if you forget to give a patient his meds or forget to submit an insurance request? Get a planner.
They go to law school.
Honestly, a 4.0 is overrated. Sacrifice a few tenths of a point and go have fun every once in a while. College only happens once in your life (unless you're the 53 year old sitting in a freshman class), so make the most out of it.
You can easily have fun in college and keep a 4.0. I know I have 😎
majoring in communications right? what a hard life
honestly, if you want to obtain a good GPA and any decent school in the USA you will have to bust ass if you are a science or engineering major. The amount you need to study is primarily dependent on how fast you learn topics and how much dedication/work ethic you have. No matter how intelligent you are, you aren't born knowing the Needleman Wunch algorithm or how glutamate derivatives work.
Classics/Biomedical sciences double major actually. I do pick up things fairly quickly, but I also manage my time well. While people spend hours on this forum and facebook, I get my work done during the week so I can have fun at the weekend. If you'd like some study tips, let me know and I can help you out, because it seems you're all about "busting ass."
Academics aren't the only thing that are required for medical school. Research takes up a whole lot of time as does volunteering.
Well, forgive me if I don't e-mail you my CV, but I have been researching since the second semester of my freshman year in addition to many hours of volunteering and shadowing I have done.
But really, I'd say both of us are missing out on something posting on SDN on a Friday night.
I'm not criticizing your academic abilities. I'm sure like any SDN pre-med you have research, volunteering and academics under your belt. I just don't believe half the BS people put on this thread about having time to go out and party. After doing 10+ hours of research, spending time preparing for exams, doing weekly homework sets and working out, i really doubt any human being has time/energy to "party"
I do think your assessment is correct. However, I do think there is a point to be made. My dad was the salutatorian in his class at Caltech in the 70's (before grade inflation even existed, he graduated with a 4.1 with a Mech E degree). He pretty much studied most of his waking hours. I recall that when I went to college at a similarly ranked university, he told me not to "replicate how he approached it". Namely, it wasn't worth sacrificing social life and personal development for picture perfect grades. This is in hindsight, after years of recovering from an experience from which all he learned was how to grind out academic work and nothing else. As a result, my advice is to learn how to work efficiently enough to produce results and learn the material, but also allow enough time to expand your personal development. I also think I neglected this aspect in college (for different reasons), and regret it as well.MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY.
But really, you're kind of right. I can't go out and party every Thursday, Friday and Saturday, but I definitely have fun at least once a week.
He just studied a lot. His life there was pretty much wake up, go to class, and do work. People will get varying results with that kind of schedule but for him studying pretty much all the time outside of class got him straight A's. He didn't need to do all nighters or anything cramming related because he studied periodically every day. That being said, he told me there is more to college than getting straight A's. While he still wanted me to do well, he thought there was value in doing other things in college as well (such as dating, making friends, pursuing hobbies, etc.).How did he get a 4.1?
I've seen a few friends go through some personal development in college. Some have had a little too much personal development.
He just studied a lot. His life there was pretty much wake up, go to class, and do work. People will get varying results with that kind of schedule but for him studying pretty much all the time outside of class got him straight A's. He didn't need to do all nighters or anything cramming related because he studied periodically every day. That being said, he told me there is more to college than getting straight A's. While he still wanted me to do well, he thought there was value in doing other things in college as well (such as dating, making friends, pursuing hobbies, etc.).
I mean, how is a 4.1 in college possible without grade inflation/some sort of grade weighting? This is the first I've heard of it.
I'm not criticizing your academic abilities. I'm sure like any SDN pre-med you have research, volunteering and academics under your belt. I just don't believe half the BS people put on this thread about having time to go out and party. After doing 10+ hours of research, spending time preparing for exams, doing weekly homework sets and working out, i really doubt any human being has time/energy to "party"
Hard work; intelligence might play a role.
Because if you aren't going to Harvard, Yale, etc., then your education is just inferior. 😉 People feel the need to justify their poor performance. I didn't go to a top undergrad by ANY means, but getting an A in most courses required very hard work and genuine mastery of the material (at least in the sciences). That fact is true no matter what university you attend. I suppose you might argue that expectations might be higher at HYP-like schools, but that doesn't cheapen the work required to get an A at a "lesser" university.
Lol good one
Sent from my iPhone using SDN Mobile
Strong necrobump.
This seems as good as any thread to ask this question even if it is late.
In the hypothetical situation where a student attends a school with a +/- scaled grading system, and they obtain a GPA above 4.0 on this system, would that really be viewed as superior to a 4.0? I imagine it's pretty negligible regardless, but humor me please.![]()
At my school, an A+ is a ~4.3 and an A- is a ~3.7No because A+=A=4.0
At my school, an A+ is a ~4.3 and an A- is a ~3.7
My understanding from reading through this thread is that they consider the GPA a student's school assigned. Is that not correct then?
At my school, an A+ is a ~4.3 and an A- is a ~3.7
My understanding from reading through this thread is that they consider the GPA a student's school assigned. Is that not correct then?
At my school, an A+ is a ~4.3 and an A- is a ~3.7
My understanding from reading through this thread is that they consider the GPA a student's school assigned. Is that not correct then?
Oh, thanks for the clarification everyone. Essentially there is no difference between an A+ and an A, but there is between an A and a A-.
Well...that's unfortunate.
Honestly, getting a 4.0 is an indicator more of your work ethic than intelligence, assuming that you have pretty decent intelligence to begin with. I think most normal people are very capable of getting a 4.0. It just depends on how motivated and "neurotic" you are. However, the MCAT is more an indicator of intelligence because you can't really predict the test questions to the extent you can for your classes. People might say that the MCAT is just a measurement of your testing taking abilities, but that's pretty short-sighted. People only say that if they do bad on the MCAT.