I'm in family med right now (first rotation) and lots of people come in with pretty simple problems. After taking the history usually one or two Dx are screaming out at me, but I know that when I present to my attending I need to have a couple DDx to "reason through." I end up just going to epocrates for the Dx I just made and looking at their DDx for that condition.
Problem is I feel like I'm doing this all wrong, that I shouldn't be using resources to develop a DDx, but rather should be keeping my mind wide open and generating it all on my own. I'm afraid of becoming too reliant on apps and books and stuff, and then having it come back and bite me in the butt later. It's just that it's pretty tough when one diagnosis is the clear winner.
How do you all develop differentials when evaluating/presenting a patient? Would you consider epocrates and other resources to be a harmful "crutch" to your development as a doctor? Is this just a skill that develops over time?
Problem is I feel like I'm doing this all wrong, that I shouldn't be using resources to develop a DDx, but rather should be keeping my mind wide open and generating it all on my own. I'm afraid of becoming too reliant on apps and books and stuff, and then having it come back and bite me in the butt later. It's just that it's pretty tough when one diagnosis is the clear winner.
How do you all develop differentials when evaluating/presenting a patient? Would you consider epocrates and other resources to be a harmful "crutch" to your development as a doctor? Is this just a skill that develops over time?