- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reaction score
- 13,748
Show me where those authors, who are Peds ID docs, have changed their minds. Otherwise, it stands. Now on to your article...Why are you quoting an opinion article that was accepted for publication in March?
The latest contact tracing data from 10k households in SK shows that kids are as infectious as anyone under 40: Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020
“We also found the highest COVID-19 rate (18.6% [95% CI 14.0%–24.0%]) for household contacts of school-aged children and the lowest (5.3% [95% CI 1.3%–13.7%]) for household contacts of children 0–9 years in the middle of school closure. Despite closure of their schools, these children might have interacted with each other, although we do not have data to support that hypothesis....For most age groups, COVID-19 was detected in significantly more household than nonhousehold contacts.”
Great article. It says they don’t have data to support their own (and your) hypothesis of interaction and consequential spread in schools. But they do have data to support the highest rate of spread occurs at home, where you want to make kids stay.
“Keep kids home where spread is highest. Cuz Science!”
Last edited: