R
RTC19
More than I can possibly begin to count!
About 450 kids apply from my school and about 44% or so get in. Pretty decent success rate at an individual school. Big school, though.More than I can possibly begin to count!
I get what you're saying, but isn't someone with a high gpa more likely to score well on the MCAT? I think it's rare to see someone with a low gpa ace the MCAT outside of SDN. The students getting 30+ at my school usually know what they're doingI see where you are coming from, but it's not weird. I know far too many people who bombed to think that it is an anomaly. And upper-level coursework isn't a strong indicator...my sociology 101 course was more difficult than my sociology 550 course.
Quality of instruction and course content varies too greatly to think that high GPA = mcat success (especially when you consider people with horrendous GPA's who ace the test).
[edit] And if you think about it, if high GPA = mcat success, barely anyone who applies to medical school would have to study for the mcat.
Its weird that gen chem would weed so many people out, most premeds take the AP version in high school and already have a head start on the material (as well as AP physics and bio).
There was an info session in one of our largest lecture halls during orientation, which holds around 90 people (because liberal arts school) and it was pretty packed. But there's definitely a lot of weeding. There are people describe themselves as premed despite disliking and doing poorly in gen chem and bio.
Even elite colleges can have a lot of people who got a 2 or a 3 on the exam but didn't report it, or who took AP Bio but got a B in Honors Chem, never took the AP, but set themselves on pre-med since it's probably the most high-status path associated with biology.
lol every chem class at my UG had at least a 25% scale.My school has ~50,000 students. I would say that there are at least a a few thousand at any given time. I bet a less than 1000 apply, given how brutal some of our weed-out classes can be ( one class had a curve of 35%).
As a pre-med, I can say most pre-meds are not the type of people I want to hangout with to relax. So I don't really know any of them beyond a name and a face.
I know of a lot of people that are pre-med, but many of them have no clue what to expect or how the process works. The other day I was in the library and someone was bragging about how he was accepted to two medical schools and couldn't wait to start. AUA and St. George. Yikes. SDN should be a required pre-req.
My adviser said a 3.5 is a solid GPA to shoot for, I'm sure other premeds they talked to believed them.Schools having competent pre-health advisors, and students being required to see them, should be the requirement IMO.
My adviser said a 3.5 is a solid GPA to shoot for, I'm sure other premeds they talked to believed them.
I think the "weeding" out is a myth. I did an engineering degree and I'm doing a DIY post-bacc and I've never seen classes that were designed to make students fail. I have seen professors that have high failure rates that were not class specific so I guess you could argue that professors might take it upon themselves to fail students who shouldn't be there but as far as the "weedout" classes, they are just a myth. Schools are not actively seeking to fail students out of their courses.I honestly haven't noticed too much weeding out, at least in the sense where my peers leave the sciences entirely. What happens more often instead is that the poorer students see the writing on the wall GPA wise after orgo 1/2 and switch to pre grad school, PA, PT, OH or dental. Others switch to engineering, which while challenging doesn't necessitate a high GPA for a solid outcome...
"Weeding out" doesn't refer to an active effort by UGs to fail students; they couldn't care less about limiting med school applicants, and they want to keep students in their school because more classes=more $$$$. Weed out refers to the difficulty of the first science classes you take in college that are inherently difficult for freshman and sophomores, which cause people at get bad grades and are weeded out of the premed track due to a bad gpa/loosing motivation. Or at least that's how I understand it.I think the "weeding" out is a myth. I did an engineering degree and I'm doing a DIY post-bacc and I've never seen classes that were designed to make students fail. I have seen professors that have high failure rates that were not class specific so I guess you could argue that professors might take it upon themselves to fail students who shouldn't be there but as far as the "weedout" classes, they are just a myth. Schools are not actively seeking to fail students out of their courses.
Another way to interpret it is that schools don't seek to "fail" students per se, but rather ramp up the workload and difficulty above what might reasonable be expected in introductory courses, such that only students who are truly dedicated continue on the pre-med track.I think the "weeding" out is a myth. I did an engineering degree and I'm doing a DIY post-bacc and I've never seen classes that were designed to make students fail. I have seen professors that have high failure rates that were not class specific so I guess you could argue that professors might take it upon themselves to fail students who shouldn't be there but as far as the "weedout" classes, they are just a myth. Schools are not actively seeking to fail students out of their courses.
I went to a middle of the pack University and I'm doing my post-bacc at a small state school so maybe the "weedout" phenomenon is used at larger schools. In my experience, every class, regardless of difficulty, had roughly the same percentage of students pass and it was entirely professor dependent, not class specific. My chem II class had 1/3rd D or F but my orgo I class with a different professor easily had 90% pass rate. Just like my statics class (easiest engineer course) had a 25% D or F rate but my advanced computation fluid dynamics class had 100% pass rate. I think pass/fail rates are just a product or the professor and not the class. At least that was my experience. Students that dropped usually did so after a tough professor, it didn't really matter which class it was.Another way to interpret it is that schools don't seek to "fail" students per se, but rather ramp up the workload and difficulty above what might reasonable be expected in introductory courses, such that only students who are truly dedicated continue on the pre-med track.
"Weeding out" doesn't refer to an active effort by UGs to fail students; they couldn't care less about limiting med school applicants, and they want to keep students in their school because more classes=more $$$$. Weed out refers to the difficulty of the first science classes you take in college that are inherently difficult for freshman and sophomores, which cause people at get bad grades and are weeded out of the premed track due to a bad gpa/loosing motivation. Or at least that's how I understand it.
Absolutely. I've only been with my pre-med classmates in my post-bacc for their freshman year so I haven't seen anyone get enough C's yet to change their med school ambitions but I imagine it will get to a point where they realize that those Cs add up. I do get a laugh out of students lecturing me on how my 3.17 cGPA isn't going to get me into any DO school but then talk about how the 3.0 they have is just freshman year and nobody cares.Second this, it's what I've observed in my UG and the other small state schools near home where I've taken summer classes. I've seen very few pre-med students straight up fail a class during UG but there are plenty of C's to go around. People seem to get pretty discouraged after a few of those and decide to switch tracks.
I'd rather have this than get by in my lower levels and be outright weeded out with cruddy grades at the junior/senior level."Weeding out" doesn't refer to an active effort by UGs to fail students; they couldn't care less about limiting med school applicants, and they want to keep students in their school because more classes=more $$$$. Weed out refers to the difficulty of the first science classes you take in college that are inherently difficult for freshman and sophomores, which cause people at get bad grades and are weeded out of the premed track due to a bad gpa/loosing motivation. Or at least that's how I understand it.
My adviser said a 3.5 is a solid GPA to shoot for, I'm sure other premeds they talked to believed them.
how many of them did you kill to get into medical school?100% of my classmates were premed. Coincidence? You decide
I know all people on SDN apply with a 4.0 and 528 *sarcasm* but a 3.5 is .1 below the average GPA of an accepted student to an MD school in the USA. A 3.5 is solid, especially combined with a strong MCAT. The difference after a 3.5 is not huge unless you're shooting for a top 20. What really matters at that point is MCAT and the whole package that your application presents you as. Don't get so caught up on a .1 difference in GPA. Have fun and just do well in the MCAT! 🙂 I believe in you!
*also, n=1 but I did get acceptance to medical WITH a 3.5, so I'm not just trying to lie and be a mean person. 🙂
Haha, not competing for spots in a medical school class, that's funny. And wrong.
Love this.Didn't get a notification that someone had quoted me. It's always fun to see someone so arrogantly post something incorrect. I said you're not competing directly for seats because that is how ADCOMs on this site have explained it. If you know better than the ADCOMs, you should probably message them so they stop giving out wrong information about med school admissions.