im just wondering how many times you should go through material for an exam if you want to get an A
the magic number (for me) is 3.
1. go to class/watch the lecture. first pass effect--focus on the main points rather than trying to write down everyting. if the lecturer says "This is important *WINK* put a star next to it because its important lolz. or if they say, "dont memorize this" draw a big X through it.
2. a few days later-- study the lecture-- most of the studying is done during the 2nd pass.
3. day or two before the test -- go through the lecture again so that its fresh on your mind before the exam.
the magic number (for me) is 3.
1. go to class/watch the lecture. first pass effect--focus on the main points rather than trying to write down everyting. if the lecturer says "This is important *WINK* put a star next to it because its important lolz. or if they say, "dont memorize this" draw a big X through it.
2. a few days later-- study the lecture-- most of the studying is done during the 2nd pass.
3. day or two before the test -- go through the lecture again so that its fresh on your mind before the exam.
so is all the test information on the powerpoint slides?3x. 3x gets me the As. If I do 2x, I usually drop to a B+ or A- if I can pull it off.
Listen to lecture on 1.5x-2x speed. Reread lecture slides and make a little study sheet of stuff I know I will forget. Review study sheet of stuff I forgot.
My study sheet is copying and pasting lines from lecture slides into a Word document, or noting down which slides I need to print out and review later.
so is all the test information on the powerpoint slides?
so is all the test information on the powerpoint slides?
You guys are all machines. My final exams (which are oral) include everything that was taught for the subject throughout the year, and I find that I need to read and go over the material a lot more than 3 times to really get it memorized. I sometimes do notes, but I'm trying to just force myself to read instead, since it's less time consuming...
You guys are all machines. My final exams (which are oral) include everything that was taught for the subject throughout the year, and I find that I need to read and go over the material a lot more than 3 times to really get it memorized. I sometimes do notes, but I'm trying to just force myself to read instead, since it's less time consuming...
I think the only place they have oral exams is foreign schools. And a yearly comprehensive oral exam is going to be some place like India or Pakistan.
im just wondering how many times you should go through material for an exam if you want to get an A
I consistently get in the top 5% of my class on exams.... Some people live by Name/Expression mneumonics - I don't know any at all. I use Method of Loci and Chunking by nature..
oral...exams...?
if it's not multiple choice, i refuse to do it well actually i guess i'll do those patient interaction exams but nothing else
... As I mentioned I don't use expression acronyms though while they really help others. It takes me longer to learn On Old Olympus Towering Tops, A Finn and German Viewed Some Hops than to just memorize the cranial nerves by number. Other acronyms people create for muscle groups or items of 4 mystify me as I find such to be too small and it seems more onerous to learn the mneumonic than to just visually snap a photo of the placement of the nerves or arteries relative to one another. Explore the tricks and find what works for you. 😉
it's "mnemonic" not acronym or mneumonic. And they are always much easier to remember if they are dirty.![]()
Thank you, Roadlesstraveled 🙂 I think it's natural for us to find the shortest path from point A to point B. Method of Loci is something I think we kind of do even when we don't realize it but most people don't adapt it to their benefit. If you've ever been studying somewhere or say...recalled how someone said something when you recalled the answer, those are all forms of method of loci but it's just less systematic. As I mentioned I don't use expression acronyms though while they really help others. It takes me longer to learn On Old Olympus Towering Tops, A Finn and German Viewed Some Hops than to just memorize the cranial nerves by number. Other acronyms people create for muscle groups or items of 4 mystify me as I find such to be too small and it seems more onerous to learn the mneumonic than to just visually snap a photo of the placement of the nerves or arteries relative to one another. Explore the tricks and find what works for you. 😉
there are acronym mnemonics and expression mnemonics. Like SOCRATES for pain assessment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socrates_(pain_assessment)
Yes but you didn't say "mnemonic acronym" (which I'm also not convinced is a real term even though you demonstrated it's on wiki, but letting that go) you said "expression acronym" and later "mneumonic", both of which aren't really right.![]()
[...]
In haste...I meant expression or acronym mnemonic. These aren't "terms"; these are descriptors for the type of mnemonic...you can call them whatever you like to communicate the type of mnemonic you're talking about. You can call them "mnemonics where you use big block letters to make a mellifluous sound each designating an item to remember" if you like. What's your problem?
mind giving an example of how you would memorize something via this method?
Say you need to remember a biochem pathway...you place each component of the pathway along your route and the enzymes...hang them across your path...on a tree or on a railing...
I laugh a lot when I study...I make jokes about the items I'm studying, I humanize molecules and relationships between molecules. When I think of the relationship of Hb and oxygen...I feel they're married but Hb would still rather have a hot dirty detrimental fling with CO based on the dissociation curves. That sort of nonsense. It takes the weight out of studying.
And they are always much easier to remember if they are dirty.![]()