- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 1
I apologize if I come across as whiny but this has been bothering me and I just wanted some input. I have a couple friends and a friend of a friend who have interviews at two particular schools that I also applied to.
My dilemma is that I objectively have a better application then all of them, yet I still don't have interviews at these schools. I have a much better MCAT (up to >10 points better), research with a publication and a poster (they don't have any research), WAY more leadership, volunteer work (they have essentially none), and a very similar GPA. I also applied earlier in the cycle, have great letters (some struggled to find writers last minute), and have been told my personal statement is also very very good. The only thing the three of them have in common is that their parents and other family members are alumni of these schools. Is this just the way she goes? I know admissions are a crap shoot but I honestly wasn't expecting this...
My dilemma is that I objectively have a better application then all of them, yet I still don't have interviews at these schools. I have a much better MCAT (up to >10 points better), research with a publication and a poster (they don't have any research), WAY more leadership, volunteer work (they have essentially none), and a very similar GPA. I also applied earlier in the cycle, have great letters (some struggled to find writers last minute), and have been told my personal statement is also very very good. The only thing the three of them have in common is that their parents and other family members are alumni of these schools. Is this just the way she goes? I know admissions are a crap shoot but I honestly wasn't expecting this...