- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 148
As in applying to matriculate in 2020. How much will things change in terms of competitiveness, requirements etc. based on previous trends?
First author in PNAS or PLOS a tacit requirement.
2. In the next few years it will become increasingly difficult to apply immediately out of college and taking a gap year to do something healthcare-related will become more of a de facto requirement.
That too. Scribing & EMT is the new shadowing, apparently."hardcore" clinical experience (for lack of a better term) like scribing, EMS, CNA, etc
Admittedly, I have very little knowledge of the underpinnings of healthcare at the moment because I'm only an applicant,
I think the average GPA will be around 3.8, gap years more common with a stronger focus on real world experiences. MCAT will rise to probably 513 avg for MD. I also think there will be much more applicants with extensive research experience. Some of those kids on SDN are wild. I was on SDN 4 years ago and it's crazy how prepared (neurotic) some sophomores and juniors are in high school. I've seen so many threads of high schoolers talking about what they should do or that they did research over the summer. In HIGH SCHOOL. Overall, it will get more competitive. I also think it will be interesting what schools that emphasize primary care do, because I think less and less people given debt, reimbursements, and midlevels will be interested in pursuing primary care. One of the Deans of Admissions (I think, I can't remember exactly) at the school I go to essentially said "If you want to be a family doctor going to NP school is probably a better option" just more eloquently.
There is nothing that prohibits applicants from developing an accurate understanding of the health system, it just takes a little time and effort. I always recommend Understanding Health Policy: A Clinical Approach by Thomas Bodenheimer. You can get a new copy on Amazon for $41.
Reading it will reduce responses like this one:
Is there any similar book without political leaning? I mean it has very useful information but I don't want to keep running into similar passages. It makes an annoying reading experience.With employment-based health insurance, employers usually pay most of the premium that purchases health insurance for their employees (Figure 2–3). However, this flow of money is not as simple as it looks. The federal government views employer premium payments as a tax-deductible business expense. The government does not treat the health insurance fringe benefit as taxable income to the employee, even though the payment of premiums could be interpreted as a form of employee income. Because each premium dollar of employersponsored health insurance results in a reduction in taxes collected, the government is in essence subsidizing employer-sponsored health insurance. This subsidy is enormous, estimated at $200 billion in 2006 (Selden and Gray, 2006).
Is there any similar book without political leaning? I mean it has very useful information but I don't want to keep running into similar passages. It makes an annoying reading experience.
As in applying to matriculate in 2020. How much will things change in terms of competitiveness, requirements etc. based on previous trends?
Two predictions:
1. The score requirements will increase modestly.
2. In the next few years it will become increasingly difficult to apply immediately out of college and taking a gap year to do something healthcare-related will become more of a de facto requirement.
But overall, everything will remain basically the same.
Same as above, I think the "traditional" route will become a small minority (they already make up less than 40% of admits and are trending downwards), and I think score creep will continue.
Two predictions:
1. The score requirements will increase modestly.
2. In the next few years it will become increasingly difficult to apply immediately out of college and taking a gap year to do something healthcare-related will become more of a de facto requirement.
But overall, everything will remain basically the same.
I think the average GPA will be around 3.8, gap years more common with a stronger focus on real world experiences. MCAT will rise to probably 513 avg for MD. I also think there will be much more applicants with extensive research experience. Some of those kids on SDN are wild. I was on SDN 4 years ago and it's crazy how prepared (neurotic) some sophomores and juniors are in high school. I've seen so many threads of high schoolers talking about what they should do or that they did research over the summer. In HIGH SCHOOL. Overall, it will get more competitive. I also think it will be interesting what schools that emphasize primary care do, because I think less and less people given debt, reimbursements, and midlevels will be interested in pursuing primary care. One of the Deans of Admissions (I think, I can't remember exactly) at the school I go to essentially said "If you want to be a family doctor going to NP school is probably a better option" just more eloquently.
It is completely unnecessary and adds nothing to what is being discussed. Plus, it insinuates that if anything not taxed is subsidized by the government, which is asinine notion.I am not sure what you find objectionable in the above passage.
It is completely unnecessary and adds nothing to what is being discussed. Plus, it insinuates that if anything not taxed is subsidized by the government, which is asinine notion.
The only way this question is relevant to what I wrote is that I would say "no" and you would reply that it was because of the tax incentive, which would imply that it made financial sense for a corporation to pay, say, 5 million dollars for employee health insurance in order to not pay tax on that 5 million, instead of paying say 30% of that 5 million and keep the rest.Do you know how the US came to have an employer-based system of health insurance?
The only way this question is relevant to what I wrote is that I would say "no" and you would reply that it was because of the tax incentive, which would imply that it made financial sense for a corporation to pay, say, 5 million dollars for employee health insurance in order to not pay tax on that 5 million, instead of paying say 30% of that 5 million and keep the rest.
In short, no. Educate me then.
A jump from 508.7 (30 on the old scale) to a 513 (32.5 old) would be a jump from 80th to 90th percentile for the average accepted applicant. That can't and won't happen in 2 years unless something absolutely radical happens in admissions.The scoring of the new MCAT is still "stabilizing" so to speak as well as the lag in old vs. new still has data with a large fraction of old MCAT. There was a 10 year chart ending in about 2012-2013 showing that average overall MCAT went from about 29.5 to 31.2 and GPAs, both overall and science, increased by o.05 during the same span.
That passage adds nothing to what was being discussed. The important historical facts have already been stated. There is no need for interpretation.