What is a common mistake that applicants make in approaching the primary and secondary applications? [11:22]
I think a common mistake that I’ve seen over the years that I’ve done this kind of work is that the applicant doesn’t treat the personal comments as personal comments. It becomes a space for them to revisit experiences and tell us why they’re a good choice to be a physician and recount their degree, research, and volunteer experience. That’s just a waste of 5,300 characters because it doesn’t give us any additional information. We’ve already read that in the experiences section.
The challenge with the personal comments is that some schools don’t read them, and some schools read them very thoroughly. I think applicants need to think about the school that reads it thoroughly. If the school isn’t going to look at it, that’s fine. I mean, it doesn’t hurt your application in any way if they ignore that. Where it hurts is if a school looks at it and if they haven’t done a good job there.
It’s important to help schools understand something about you. I know, generally, students feel they need to explain why they want to pursue medicine, and it could be that or why you’ve done all the things that you’ve done. Collectively, there should be understanding that a person has from having volunteered and having done the research, and having had
leadership in all of those things.
The second one is oftentimes really strong candidates get lost in the
stories. It’s story after story of things that they’ve experienced in the clinical setting, and there’s none of themselves in it. It’s all about Mr. Jones and Mrs. Smith and the little girl whose hand they held, which is all really sweet and touching, but at the end of the day we don’t know anything more about them other than these experiences that they’ve had. Personal comments are going to be really important. That’s a mistake that we often see when the personal statement doesn’t add anything to their application.