How old is too old?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
so do you normally ask people for their opinions and then passively-aggressively scoff at those which you dont agree with..




Actually I was a bystander reading your comments, not asking you anything, opinions or otherwise. Further, your 'diagnosis' (perception is probably a more apt description) of passive-aggressive behaviour warrants reassessment - you are far from the mark.

Scoff? I laugh. :laugh:

Lighten up, for heaven's sake. Life is far too gorgeous to get your knickers all in a twist about something you know so little about. Opinions, sure we all have them - but based on what, this is the oyster.

Amusing to have met you. Perhaps we shall meet on graduation day. Then again, perhaps not.

Carry on - I'm outa here.


very well. best of luck with your applications, you'll probably need it. 😀
 
I'm 59 and finishing up a post-master psychiatric nurse practitioner program. I don't intend to enroll in a Ph.D. psychology program but probably will get a Ph.D.. I'm doing it because I love it, need to survive in today's world just like anyone else, and most importantly of all, now that I'm at the age where I know most everything, I can give my patients their money's worth. 😀 If you're under 50...maybe 47...you're still trying to find your zipper.

Zenman, could you PM me? I would like to hear how you plan to go about getting into a PhD program. If you know anyone who started a PhD program over 40, I also would like to hear that person's story Thanks.
 
Certain Ph.D programs might actually prefer older students. I know that for clinical psychology programs that are more psychodynamically-oriented, they would like someone with actual life experience than a fresh young college graduate.
 
Zenman, could you PM me? I would like to hear how you plan to go about getting into a PhD program. If you know anyone who started a PhD program over 40, I also would like to hear that person's story Thanks.

I could but there's not much to discuss. Remember I'm not talking about a Ph.D. in psychology and since I've been running around Asia for the last 5 years I don't know anyone trying to get into a psych program. I guess I've just never consider that age was an issue and always expected to be admitted to every program I applied to. So far, 2 masters and now this post-grad program. I am taking a nursing doctoral course as an elective and my professor has asked me twice now to enroll in the program. If I go to the trouble to fill out the paperwork, I expect to be admitted. 😀
 
As I look around at all the twenty something applicants at my interviews, I can't imagine ever going to any of them as a therapist. I prefer someone older, wiser, and more experienced. Just my 2 cents.

Since therapists aren't supposed to give advice, I don't really see why life experience should be more highly valued than clinical experience and technique. I don't see any reason why a 20 year old can't be an equally good therapist as a 70 year old if they have comparable training. Empirically supported interventions don't generally rely on the therapist drawing from her/his own experience but rather their knowledge of psychology, ability to build rapport with the client, and their adeptness at carrying out the therapy. Unless you are a psychodynamic sort of person, in which case... well we would probably disagree on a lot more things related to therapy than just the age of the therapist :laugh:
 
Since therapists aren't supposed to give advice, I don't really see why life experience should be more highly valued than clinical experience and technique. I don't see any reason why a 20 year old can't be an equally good therapist as a 70 year old if they have comparable training. Empirically supported interventions don't generally rely on the therapist drawing from her/his own experience but rather their knowledge of psychology, ability to build rapport with the client, and their adeptness at carrying out the therapy. Unless you are a psychodynamic sort of person, in which case... well we would probably disagree on a lot more things related to therapy than just the age of the therapist :laugh:

I don't think that age alone makes anyone a better therapist, but I do believe that a therapist's most important instrument in doing their work is his/herself. I realize not everyone would agree, but I believe this is true despite one's theoretical orientation. Than again, I'm more psychodynamic.😉
 
Since therapists aren't supposed to give advice, I don't really see why life experience should be more highly valued than clinical experience and technique. I don't see any reason why a 20 year old can't be an equally good therapist as a 70 year old if they have comparable training. Empirically supported interventions don't generally rely on the therapist drawing from her/his own experience but rather their knowledge of psychology, ability to build rapport with the client, and their adeptness at carrying out the therapy. Unless you are a psychodynamic sort of person, in which case... well we would probably disagree on a lot more things related to therapy than just the age of the therapist :laugh:

While psychotherapy, especially that which is practiced today, may not be established on a foundation of life experience, all of the psychotherapists I know (dozens of therapists, from many different therapeutic approaches), seem, at least occasionally, to put their life experience to work in providing psychotherapy. I think that a therapist who started at any age can be a highly competent therapist. If I had to compare and contrast therapists, I'd want to do it on a case-by-case basis.

I would bet that I could provide noticeably better psychotherapy now then I could have twenty years ago--just because I've had twenty more years to observe the world.
 
Since the therapeutic relationship trumps specific modalities, does it stand to reason that the older therapist has more "relationship experiences?"
 
Since the therapeutic relationship trumps specific modalities, does it stand to reason that the older therapist has more "relationship experiences?"

I'm not sure I agree that the therapeutic relationship "trumps" specific modalities. Do we have a citation for older therapists being more effective/having stronger alliances? I'd be hesitant to play the main effect game with this one.
 
I'm not sure I agree that the therapeutic relationship "trumps" specific modalities. Do we have a citation for older therapists being more effective/having stronger alliances? I'd be hesitant to play the main effect game with this one.

I wouldn't say the relationship trumps everything else, but I'd argue that the relationship is the necessary ingredient that allows everything else to happen. Without it, I think therapy affords little that one couldn't get by reading a good "self help" book.
 
Research shows that it doesn't matter which modality is used so much as the client-therapist relationship, which might explain the effectiveness of bartenders. :laugh:
 
there is no road to go down really, you've created a slippery slope/strawman argument.

and it wouldnt be an official cutoff, just something unwritten that everyone recognized
age is different than skin color/belief system/gender. think about it, lets say someone who is 55 applies, gets in, finishes when they're 62.. now what? start practicing in another year or so, so now they're 64-65 and finally starting on their own, they have maybe a good 10 years of working and that's it. either die or just become too senile to be an effective therapist/researcher/teacher.. just being honest...would you really want to see a therapist who is 80-90 years old?

Beck is 86, are you saying you wouldn't want to sit down and listen to the advice that he has to share for a half hour. The half hour I spent talking with him last year was incredible, I felt fortunate to have had the opportunity to sit down with him and get his take on a few questions.

Just being honest... Yes, if I were a patient and 86 year old Tim Beck rolled into the room, I'd feel pretty fortunate.

Mark
 
Research shows that it doesn't matter which modality is used so much as the client-therapist relationship, which might explain the effectiveness of bartenders. :laugh:

If you're referring about the dodo bird verdict paper, I know that's what you're going after, but that interpretation of it isn't quite correct anymore. The relationship is important and necessary, but for some disorders/clientele, modality has been shown to matter.

Beck is 86, are you saying you wouldn't want to sit down and listen to the advice that he has to share for a half hour. The half hour I spent talking with him last year was incredible, I felt fortunate to have had the opportunity to sit down with him and get his take on a few questions.

Just being honest... Yes, if I were a patient and 86 year old Tim Beck rolled into the room, I'd feel pretty fortunate.

Mark

Yeah, I was going to bring up Tim!!
 
If you're referring about the dodo bird verdict paper, I know that's what you're going after, but that interpretation of it isn't quite correct anymore. The relationship is important and necessary, but for some disorders/clientele, modality has been shown to matter.

I was thinking about Lambert & Barley (2002) review of psychotherapy outcome research. Actually I was thinking too hard as I'm multi-tasking here....
 
Top