- Joined
- Feb 16, 2008
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 0
On the other hand, recently I ran into an O6 nurse who appeared to be enthusiastic about replacing physicians with nurse practitioners. I got the impression he was happy and could possibly be facilitating the departure of physicians to accelerate this process
Is this a bad thing? My impression is that quite a few docs on this board would be sanguine about letting PAs take over some of the GMO positions. In the past, on this forum at least, quite a lot of people seemed to like the idea of PAs being the highest level of care provider assigned to the batallion level, with supervising doctors on the regimental level, rather than forcing a doc into every batallion.
Only downside is there will be less incentive for the military to create more accessions to student physicians... and would it be possible for it to decrease available HPSP spots for MD/DO students?
I'm sorry I just don't see why this means the FP needs to be at the Batallion level. HS football players need access to this kid of care, but that doesn't mean every HS football team needs it's own dedicated doctor. Is the volume of complaints (specifically complaints that a PA can't handle) really high enough to necessitate one FP per batallion?My firm belief is that every battalion needs a board certified FP physician. Marines are like professional athletes. They deserve and require the kind of medical care that a professional athlete receives throughout every phase of the deployment cycle.
My firm belief is that every battalion needs a board certified FP physician. Marines are like professional athletes. They deserve and require the kind of medical care that a professional athlete receives throughout every phase of the deployment cycle.
That's an interesting concept. Maybe we should start assigning athletic trainers to battalions too. They could tape up every morning so they don't sprain their ankle while kicking in doors.
Every battalion: FP physician, FP nurse practitioner, corpsmen, physical therapy tech, psych tech... Will be bored during peace time but mission critical at war time.
What do you think?
Having deployed as part of a team that was "mission critical at war time" but actually sat on our asses for four months, I'm not sure that's the best solution. The military is generally over-prepared/equipped/staffed for what they will see in a deployed environment and under-prepared/equipped/staffed to do their non-combat role.
If 11 guys break into your house one night, you don't need a bigger magazine, you need better locks.As a second ammendment fan, it reminds me of the "you can never have too many guns or too much ammo" argument. If I have a magazine that only holds ten rounds because of some stupid law, rest assured, one night 11 guys will break into my house, and I will not have enough.
As a second ammendment fan, it reminds me of the "you can never have too many guns or too much ammo" argument. If I have a magazine that only holds ten rounds because of some stupid law, rest assured, one night 11 guys will break into my house, and I will not have enough.
I rememer, when taking my first basic firearms class, the teacher was a cop who strongly advocated civilians buy revolvers rather than semi-autos which would hold more ammo. The reason that he gave was that most civilians who get the chance to use their semi-auto in self-defense have a tendancy to get their thumb behind the chamber (because they´re in a panic) an cut halfway through their thumbs while shooting the intruder. As he put it ¨and if you ever need more than 6 bullets, it´s time for you to run´.
If 11 guys break into your house one night, you don't need a bigger magazine, you need better locks.
PAs competing for the HPSP is irrelevant, because as somebody else pointed out there arent too many suckers who are willing to be fooled into signing that contract and there are tons of open spaces every year.
However, the NHSC program is different. Unlike HPSP, its a highly competitive program and not everybody gets accepted. Over the past couple of decades, the NHSC has greatly expanded the number of people who can apply for it. Its not just PAs and NPs, its social workers, psychologists and god knows who else.
The net result is that the number of NHSC slots has remained flat while the categories of people applying for it has greatly expanded and it has essentially barred a lot of doctors from working in rural areas to get loan repayment.
Were you hoping for some kind of anti-PA diatribe here? Most of us think highly of the PAs we work with. A PA could (and does) do 1 of my 2 jobs and could have handled 98% of what I saw while deployed.
The fastest provider in my group is a PA (civilian.)
PAs competing for the HPSP is irrelevant,Are you implying that PAs and Docs compete for the same HPSP slots?
If you are then this is not accurate.
I was one of the first (ever) Navy HPSP Scholarship recipients. I can tell you that my designation is (1995X) not (1975X) which is the designator for Medical AFHPSP students. Therefore I did not "compete" for a slot with anyone else than other PA students.
A GMO-type slot is just fine with me. I have a three year commitment and am looking forward to getting as much experience as possible.👍
PAs competing for the HPSP is irrelevant, because as somebody else pointed out there arent too many suckers who are willing to be fooled into signing that contract and there are tons of open spaces every year.
However, the NHSC program is different. Unlike HPSP, its a highly competitive program and not everybody gets accepted. Over the past couple of decades, the NHSC has greatly expanded the number of people who can apply for it. Its not just PAs and NPs, its social workers, psychologists and god knows who else.
The net result is that the number of NHSC slots has remained flat while the categories of people applying for it has greatly expanded and it has essentially barred a lot of doctors from working in rural areas to get loan repayment.
Every battalion: FP physician, FP nurse practitioner, corpsmen, physical therapy tech, psych tech... Will be bored during peace time but mission critical at war time.
What do you think?
Maybe - just maybe - if battalion sized units were being sent off alone, to isolated areas without nearby support or the ability to call in a quick medevac, then it would make sense to have a doctor assigned to the unit. But that's not the way the modern US military works. We have radios, and echelon 2 is always a short flight away. Doctors at the battalion level are an unnecessary use of a scarce resource.
Excellent points. Thank you. 🙂
I hear talk of replacing these billets with board cert. guys. Any wind of simply eliminating some of the billets all together?