Wow... I'm not sure how my post could have been so spectacularly misinterpreted but here goes.
FIRST of all, what I am saying is that no applicant can have a good idea of what medical field they want to pursue before third year, and going to a USMD allows a chance of becoming a doc in the applicant's desired field (this is a known fact supported by MULTIPLE figures, so go ahead and try to contest lol).
As a medical student that is almost done with his third year and who continues to be interested in the same specialty he thought he wanted to do when he was 16, I would wager I have a bit more insight than someone who might actually be 16, but this isn't relevant to the rest of the post. What is relevant is that if someone is going to a DO school, they should go with the understanding that the most competitive specialties (surgical subspecialties + derm + rad onc + IR) are essentially out of reach. If you would rather not be a doctor than be a doctor in not one of those specialties, then don't go to a DO school. Simple as that.
Essentially, what you are saying is that the applicant should just blindly go to DO school, and if they want to pursue derm or PRS, well too bad - because time was wasted [sorry, "spent"] on OMM they didn't have as much time to study and therefore got a lower step one score - But wait! they got a 600 on their COMLEX. As they eagerly submit this to their ACGME PD, they soon realize s/he doesn't care/know what that even means and takes into account their 220 step I. Now they have to go to the <50 - bed community program doing gsurg and hope to god that they match into a fellowship (chances ≈ 0). So I mean yeah, I guess what you are saying holds true, that one can become a licensed doc either way, but why restrict yourself to certain specialties right out of the gate (and force you to work harder/limit yourself because of OMM as well as going to a DO school)???
You are putting words in my mouth. Again, if you don't want to do neurosurgery or ENT or something, then DO is a perfectly sound option. Someone going to a DO school should not presume that they will be able to go into a highly competitive specialty.
Also, DO grads have [yes, slightly] lower match rates, so why be in that <1%?
This is not a significant difference and not a good argument against going to a DO school.
However, I do agree with the popular opinion that the OP should goto a DO school vs pharm if they want to be a doc, but they need to get their reasons straight first before making any major life decisions at this point (the road to being a doc is long & hard).
Yes
This is still not even remotely true. The match rates for DOs are lower in non-primary care specialties because (for the most part) DO schools really, really push primary care. It's not because it's "just harder for them to match". A DO and an MD with comparable/the same board scores have essentially equal shots at a vast majority of residency positions.
False. DO discrimination is real. Step 1 is not the great equalizer. A DO with a high step score will still be locked out of many competitive programs even in specialties like IM and Gen Surg. Sucks, but it's true.
I want to note, though, that there are indeed some residency programs that are harder to enter as a DO. These programs are certainly the minority.
Mid to high tier (for lack of a better word - this isn't really how residencies work but it's how premeds seem to understand them) academic programs, almost all programs in neurosurgery, ENT, orthopedic surgery, urology, ophthalmology, integrated plastics, integrated vascular, integrated CT, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, and dermatology.
TCOM literally just graduated someone who went on to a neurosurgery residency at Mayo.
The exception that proves the rule.
It's not a once-in-a-blue-moon phenomenon for DOs to match their (logical) top choice residencies.
Top choice has many meanings. Do you mean top choice as in your dream residency or the best program you applied to or the program you ranked #1? You can't rank a program if you don't interview there, so you have to specify what you mean by "top choice".
No - that's exactly what I'm saying...it is harder for DO students to have higher board scores because of the multiple hours a week spent studying OMM. Think about it - USMD with more time to study basic sciences vs a DO who needs to have OMM classes, labs, and devote valuable studying hours to [OMM]. Simply, this is a large factor as to why DOs have lower board scores.
The board scores don't account for most of the discrepancy.
Many, many ACGME programs discriminate DOs - and so does popular opinion... the average US citizen will not know what a DO is, and will almost certainly know what an MD is (in fact, there is an SDN thread describing this very phenomenon).
Popular opinion doesn't discriminate against DOs. Some residencies (and fellowships) have some bias towards USMD.