- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 0
How bad does that look to ADCOMS?
Yes, I got Bs on my first try and I was living in my parents' basement at the time.
B's? You're done. Game over.
How bad does that look to ADCOMS?
Do the other 85% not go on to become doctors, pharmacists and dentists? 😕
I took Physics, Microbiology and Organic in one quarter. It wasn't too bad.
That was my other option; then since I am in a quarter system, all pharm schools want at least 3 quarters of physics, ochem, gen chem, bio, and biochem; and its my microbio B.S. major requirements anyway.
So if I took Ochem, Biochem, and physics all in one quarter I have to do it 3 quarters in a row...
Did you do good in physics, micro, and organic?
You did good though, and physics isn't that important anyway...lol. I give you props for doing all three, that will be me in the next quarter or two 😀B- in Organic, B+ in Microbiology and C in Physics. Physics would have been better but we have the worst department in the known universe.
You did good though, and physics isn't that important anyway...lol. I give you props for doing all three, that will be me in the next quarter or two 😀
Yes I too, will do a schedule just like that after my Ochem, and stuff is done.I've always been better in Biology classes than others. This quarter and next quarter is Organic, Physics and A&P, plus labs for all three.
Well damn.
Anyone got the number for that one truck-driving school?....
so Ochem is that hard? I was planning to take Ochem and biochem and physics all in the same quarter.....
Am I really?😱your out of your mind lol. take ochem and physics one semester and biochem another semester. ochem and biochem were by far the toughest classes ive taken, i cant imagine taking them at the same time.
your out of your mind lol. take ochem and physics one semester and biochem another semester. ochem and biochem were by far the toughest classes ive taken, i cant imagine taking them at the same time.
Because there are plenty of (almost) straight A students (3.8-3.9, though I met a few 4.0 like that too)who have plenty of time for community service, involvement with professional organizations, leadership positions, and so on. Getting A's is not necessarily a result of poring over books days in and days out. Though students who just can't get to straight-As inspite of their best efforts certainly do like to imagine that students with much better grades as doing nothing but studying, and having no life (though they do exist too, of course). Must make them feel better. 😀I will never understand people who look down on B's. Being a straight A machine does not always look that great. I've had professors who were on graduate admissions committees say that they would rather choose someone with a 3.4-3.6 with community service and some research than a straight A machine with nothing else to show.
True, there are over-achievers out there that do absolutely everything!!! (and sometimes you hate'em for it) but then again, there are others where the subjects come easy to them or they have a photographic memory...Because there are plenty of (almost) straight A students (3.8-3.9, though I met a few 4.0 like that too)who have plenty of time for community service, involvement with professional organizations, leadership positions, and so on. Getting A's is not necessarily a result of poring over books days in and days out. Though students who just can't get to straight-As inspite of their best efforts certainly do like to imagine that students with much better grades as doing nothing but studying, and having no life (though they do exist too, of course). Must make them feel better. 😀
I never said that every person who gets all As does not engage in any of the activities you mentioned. I was trying to point out that getting a B does not make you look in any way like a failure. Sometimes having other things in one's background will make you stand out more than a letter. Depending on the grading scale, having an A does not mean that they did much better than someone with a B. This is especially true if the school that one attends isn't on a +/- scale. If I receive a 91% and get an A and someone else gets a 89% and gets a B, there really isn't a significant difference between us with regard to knowing the material. What would be the difference? Two questions missed on an exam? Grad schools know this which is why I was saying that getting a B, or an A for that matter, doesn't always mean much.Because there are plenty of (almost) straight A students (3.8-3.9, though I met a few 4.0 like that too)who have plenty of time for community service, involvement with professional organizations, leadership positions, and so on. Getting A's is not necessarily a result of poring over books days in and days out. Though students who just can't get to straight-As inspite of their best efforts certainly do like to imagine that students with much better grades as doing nothing but studying, and having no life (though they do exist too, of course). Must make them feel better. 😀
You aren't trying to get into an astrophysics graduate program at MIT here, it's pharmacy school.
Do you like staplers?
I have 3.9 GPA, and I have my life.
To answer the poster's question: Getting Bs in ORg 1, and 2 is acceptable. The subject is hard. However, in real world, schools do not look at GPA only, and dimiss other factors. They look at your entire quality. Just picture you as a pharmacist, and see what you should be in order to fullfill the need of society. You need to be professional, good communication skill, and knowledgeable. So, make sure you have other qualities besides GPA, and I think it is always easier to improve your social skills than change your grades. So take time to improve.