- Joined
- Oct 9, 2016
- Messages
- 387
- Reaction score
- 409
Last edited:
The need for the rant is that I was 3 points of 431 away from getting an A-, when I need to be building my grade instead of keeping B's.
my GPA now is 3.63 instead of 3.64, and the highest I can make it is a 3.68 instead of a 3.69
The questions can be straightforward or even convoluted, whatever, but the fact is if you miss something in lecture and don't realize it, there's no way to corroborate because there's no notes to compare to. I know teachers don't have to post their notes online, but why not just do it? What do they gain by making a class structured like this where we only have the slides from class, and new material for 2 classes before the test, which don't matter for the current stuff.
You seem to have stopped reading right where I said "but"Is it annoying? Maybe. My gen chem I course was graded like this and I have sour memories of it.
Is it unfair? No. Short of foul play, a B+ is a B+. Even by 3 points.
Does it deserve a rant?
Based on this information my assessment is no.
You seem to have stopped reading right where I said "but"
Good luck sweety! 🙂My organic chemsitry class DIDNT have homework. Yet, professor doesn’t understand why theres a low average on tests. Having Homework gives student motivation to study, and sometimes the feedback may be helpful especially in a clsss where it’s time consuming. My final is tomorrow
Ugh
Good luck! Another issue was that she took until the next Friday (4 classes later) or Monday (5 days later) to grade, so we didn't know what went wrong with how we studied till later. Oh well, like I said. Just needed to vent.My organic chemsitry class DIDNT have homework. Yet, professor doesn’t understand why theres a low average on tests. Having Homework gives student motivation to study, and sometimes the feedback may be helpful especially in a clsss where it’s time consuming. My final is tomorrow
Ugh
OP clearly said rant in title, if you don’t want to participate just don’t...Is it annoying? Maybe. My gen chem I course was graded like this and I have sour memories of it.
Is it unfair? No. Short of foul play, a B+ is a B+. Even by 3 points.
Does it deserve a rant?
Based on this information my assessment is no.
So my GPA now is 3.63 instead of 3.64, and the highest I can make it is a 3.68 instead of a 3.69.
Again, read the next maybe 5 sentences...Spoken like a true SDN addicted neurotic Pre-Med
Welcome to the family boo-boo![]()
Again, read the next maybe 5 sentences...
Just because someone acknowledges they're koo-koo doesn't make them not a koo-koo
Good luck at my undergrad evolution course. That class brings back nightmares. Occasionally get a nightmare with that class 2x a week to this day lolEvolution was a stupid waste of time at my school. Never studied for anything, didn't learn anything, didn't want to learn anything. I think I can sum up that class in one sentence: OMG evolution iz real, there's like evidence and stuff!!!
I feel like anyone who successfully made it through a middle school science class should be able to place out of that stupidity. Sorry you had to take it, OP.
probably the least scientific bio course.Evolution was a stupid waste of time at my school. Never studied for anything, didn't learn anything, didn't want to learn anything. I think I can sum up that class in one sentence: OMG evolution iz real, there's like evidence and stuff!!!
I feel like anyone who successfully made it through a middle school science class should be able to place out of that stupidity. Sorry you had to take it, OP.
I would disagree that it's the least scientific... but it's definitely the least useful bio course, by a mile.probably the least scientific bio course.
My organic chemsitry class DIDNT have homework. Yet, professor doesn’t understand why theres a low average on tests. Having Homework gives student motivation to study, and sometimes the feedback may be helpful especially in a clsss where it’s time consuming. My final is tomorrow
Ugh
What is the least scientific biology course in undergrad then?I would disagree that it's the least scientific...
I would first want to understand what you mean by "least scientific." Do you mean least rigorous? Because the courses that we teach at my university (I am a graduate student and TA), emphasize things like calculus-based models of population change in ecology, and population genetics, molecular biology, and applications to medicine in evolution.What is the least scientific biology course in undergrad then?
GUYS I passed Organic chemistry 1 !!!!!
I will have to work harder next semester!
Good job. I went to penn state my freshman year, btw.
D
I go to University at Albany. I wished I went to Penn State but I didn’t have the requirements for my major. Transfer student
Just gotta take it one step at a time, and now it's time to focus on the MCAT@Sharknad0 people on here are asses, this does sound frustrating and I'm sorry you had to deal with such a sh**y class structure but this isn't going to be the end-point for your journey into medicine so don't get too hung up on it
my genetics last summer had 106 graded assignments. 4 ball busting tests. in 6 weeks. class average of 68. she wouldn't answer ?'s about why points lost. attendance required
i had 11 secondaries due
i was working full time
probably the least scientific bio course.
Believe it or not, not all Biology class takers want to go to med school.I would disagree that it's the least scientific... but it's definitely the least useful bio course, by a mile.
I'm quite sure re-learning how to read a phylogenetic tree, which I clearly remember learning in middle school, is going to significantly help me with treating live non-extinct humans. At least, they'll be impressed that I could tell which dinosaurs are most closely related to each other, because that's what really counts in medicine, right?
BTW, understanding evolutionary biology is crucial in helping to understand why microbe become resistant to antibiotics.
It's not that I don't think the material is valuable; it's just horribly redundant. There was literally no content in my evolution class that I hadn't had at least three times previously. That's the problem I have with it. I don't like wasting my time re-learning something I've already studied a million times over just because the name of the class is the latest buzzword in education. It took up a valuable slot where I could have been taking a different class that would have taught me something new and useful.At my institution, we are actively trying to reach premeds in our life science programs with new courses in evolution for future clinicians. We want to disabuse future docs of the notion that ecology and evolution is way less useful than, for example, biochemistry.
Again, as others have said, this is likely an artifact of the rigor of your course. My evolution course ranks highly on my list of difficult (+ useful) classes.It's not that I don't think the material is valuable; it's just horribly redundant. There was literally no content in my evolution class that I hadn't had at least three times previously. That's the problem I have with it. I don't like wasting my time re-learning something I've already studied a million times over just because the name of the class is the latest buzzword in education. It took up a valuable slot where I could have been taking a different class that would have taught me something new and useful.
I covered the Hardy-Weinberg material in middle school, high school, intro bio 1, genetics, and ecology. Why, again, did I have to have it a sixth time in evolution?
If schools just took a few minutes to look at the what's covered in various classes, they could eliminate evolution from the curriculum easily. It's just a rehash of ecology, genetics, and the intro bio sequence. For the record, I learned far more about the evolution of drug resistance in bacteria in genetics and microbiology than I ever did in evolution itself.