- Joined
- Mar 17, 2003
- Messages
- 2,962
- Reaction score
- 79
would he be an academic sub specialist, a private practice pathologist or a private equity type that made tens of millions by skimming 100s of pathologists revenue?
He's a smart guy, he doesn't need to look at slides to know what's wrong with his patients.He'd be the one that knows what's wrong with you, regardless of ever reading a book or your disease progression.
No one would want to work for his group and as a result it would be him and a rotating sequence of mediocre pathologists who leave after 5 years when they get a better offer.
Every biopsy. The diagnoses would be tremendous, people. Believe me.