- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 45
Agree. Also I think some people with mental health issues tend to go into Pathology because they feel that it’s one of the fields that allows them to have the least patient contact or people contact and still allows them to be a physician.Much is also self-selection. People go into medicine, hate everything clinical, get pushed into pathology, still hate it and then feel trapped. There is no doubt many pathologists are jackasses, and academics contains many of these types on a power trip. Still I actively discourage people from choosing pathology as a backup or for the perceived easy lifestyle. Pathology can be very stressful and isn’t for most people.
So your take home is like 177,000 a year? That’s crapIf I work at Toronto General Hospital I'd be pretty depressed too. You get paid 375K, same as every other pathologist in Ontario. If you are a young attending at TGH pretty much you're a bottom feeder and they work you to the bones.
Hard to live well in downtown Toronto on that salary. Marginal tax rate on salary is 53%. 2BR condo in downtown Toronto cost 1 million dollars. Stabbing and car jacking everyday. Homeless people every street corner. Street smell like cesspool every morning.
Wow, that’s depressing. I thank god that did not happen to me. was this supposed to be a decent place or were you and all your colleagues blindsided by this crap?I saw this article in my Doximity account. Being a resident is easier now than back in my day, where you cut meat till midnight, took the garbage to the main hallway due to lack of ancillary services, and spent all morning organizing slides and paperwork for the dozen specialty pathologists, tracked down said pathologists throughout the day then served as their secretary then went back to cutting meat. Maybe you’d pick up a diagnostic Pearl from attending as you glanced into the microscope while furiously transcribing attending’s verbiage.
While the highest marginal personal income tax rate is 53%, the overall average tax rate for 375K of personal income is about 42% (per EY calculator for 2023). Therefore your take home pay would be about 215K (this assumes you are not incorporated, and ignores source deductions etc).So your take home is like 177,000 a year? That’s crap
Burnout moreso as an attending. On some rotations in residency, residents barely work or not at all (think CP lol).I agree with article in that I think burnout and depression is a much more pressing concern than what seems on the surface (although the surface doesn’t look great). I believe the biggest problem is the lack of action and urgency to address this. Serious work needs to be done to correct this field and set it towards the right trajectory. This is hard to do if leadership isn’t aggressively championing these ideals.
I would consider burnout possible even if you aren't overworked. If you aren't doing meaningful work it can also be distressing (an interesting read is with David Graeber)Burnout moreso as an attending. On some rotations in residency, residents barely work or not at all (think CP lol).
Not true. I was on surgpath for 5 months straight. I was getting burned out. There were days during the rotation I was able to relax but I was doing the same thing (3 day cycle) everyday. Hell it got so bad I became irritable and lost it once my attending yelled at me. I was there previewing until 10 pm at night and there were days I had to get back to work early for tumor board.Burnout is what happens when you do too much work that isn't appreciated or that you sacrifice too much to do.
The concentration on heavy workload as the main driver of burnout is not accurate. I think most doctors are fine with heavy workloads provided the rewards are sufficient.
I recall reading an article a few years ago about burnout in pathology. A few reasons they outlined included never seeing tangible results of your work, never achieving the feeling of mastery, and a loss of autonomy.
I bet you were being paid nothing and being treated like a peon too.Not true. I was on surgpath for 5 months straight. I was getting burned out. There were days during the rotation I was able to relax but I was doing the same thing (3 day cycle) everyday. Hell it got so bad I became irritable and lost it once my attending yelled at me. I was there previewing until 10 pm at night and there were days I had to get back to work early for tumor board.
I started to stop caring. I had a pile of surgicals to preview and I just had no motivation to do it at all.
If you gave me a week or two to do something else during those 5 months, to re energize I would be fine. Sometimes you just need a little break. I tried to tough it out as long as I could but it started to affect my work, health and I became irritable.
Lol I’d probably need Prozac and a loaded gun if I lived in the back country but to each his own.Only for city pathologists. Rural ones don't have mental health issues.
This is due to the "haves" vs "have nots" in our field which is becoming less and less common with large health care conglomerates swallowing up former private practices. This isn't as bad as it sounds on the surface, depending on one's situation. Less fat cats squeezing junior pathologists. On the other hand, if you have risen to the top in pp, it's likely a downgrade from autonomy and income.When you are in training for 6-7 years and get paid 250K in high cost of living areas of the country and get told by senior pathologists that you aren’t worth 250,000 but are only worth a bag of cheetohs and 3 Oreos, wouldn’t you have mental health issues?
I have interviewed and/or visited these impoverished, coal-mining, opioid epidemic rampant parts of rural OH, WV, and KY. To each their own: some dream to live on 10 acres of land and don't mind being a half hour from the nearest grocery store. Others want to live in the penthouse of luxury highrise with access to Michelin-starred restaurants, pro sports teams, and discotechs open until 3AM. The rural areas obviously have docs working there, pathologists included. And, they have to be higher paying in order to recruit physicians..."money talks and b.s. jerks off, baby"👶Even better… you got to go to the sticks (rural Ohio) to get a higher paying job, wouldn’t you want to blow your brains out?
I see how the former is possible for a pathologist. The latter on the other hand…. What penthouse or luxury high rise are you talking about on an urban path salary in a high COL urban area? Two bedroom maybe?some dream to live on 10 acres of land and don't mind being a half hour from the nearest grocery store. Others want to live in the penthouse of luxury highrise with access to Michelin-starred restaurants, pro sports teams, and discotechs open until 3AM
Talked with another colleague today. 5-6 years of training and 235-240k starting in big city with a limited number of jobs to choose from.This is due to the "haves" vs "have nots" in our field which is becoming less and less common with large health care conglomerates swallowing up former private practices. This isn't as bad as it sounds on the surface, depending on one's situation. Less fat cats squeezing junior pathologists. On the other hand, if you have risen to the top in pp, it's likely a downgrade from autonomy and income.
I have interviewed and/or visited these impoverished, coal-mining, opioid epidemic rampant parts of rural OH, WV, and KY. To each their own: some dream to live on 10 acres of land and don't mind being a half hour from the nearest grocery store. Others want to live in the penthouse of luxury highrise with access to Michelin-starred restaurants, pro sports teams, and discotechs open until 3AM. The rural areas obviously have docs working there, pathologists included. And, they have to be higher paying in order to recruit physicians..."money talks and b.s. jerks off, baby"👶
Isn't this is about when Webb chimes in to start a tree-cutting business or tattoo removal parlor in the styx...?
100% true. This has been the case for decades and it all comes down to supply and demand. For the first time there is a glimmer of hope for the field. It is getting difficult to hire pathologists for the corporate owned jobs and the partnership jobs in more rural towns. Practices in need of pathologists that are having trouble filling spots (often because salary is way too low but was previously enough to fill spots) are utilizing locums. Locums rates going up now and eventually practices will need to increase full time salaries to finally fill that spot. I think it takes time for the process to occur. Hopefully we will start to see more actual salary quotes on job ads. For every other specialty job ads without some sort of indication of salary are typically looked at as suspect and a potential waste of time. Once we see lots of salary quotes in the job ads, the companies not quoting salaries will be forced to follow along or go unfilled. Then we have the competition and the bids increase. Maybe over the next 2-3 years we will see this.Talked with another colleague today. 5-6 years of training and 235-240k starting in big city with a limited number of jobs to choose from.
You wonder why pathologists have mental health issues.
Years of cleaning colons during autopsies and acting like a professional secretary for attendings. You’re a gross monkey for 3- 5 years.
Senior people exploit young pathologists in this field. You are worth a snickers bar to employers in this field.
You wonder why US grads don’t apply to Pathology. When you are selling a product that is basically garbage, what competitive US grad wants a piece of it?
Go to radiology, anesthesiology where once you graduate, your employers pay you more than a snickers bar and actually think your worth more than a pile of steaming feces. And there are plenty of jobs in big cities.
Good strong fields you come out valued and get paid like you are valued. In pathology, you get out of training and people pay you 200K because that’s what employers think you are worth.
Radiology and anesthesiology trainees come out of training and are able to hit the ground running and get paid high starting salaries. In pathology, you train, for 5-6 years and employers still think you aren’t even worth a higher starting salary because you can’t sign out crap.
You never sign out cases in training, have no sort of autonomy in training or even worse are poorly trained. Then you come out looking for a job and of course employers are going to pay you $h&t.
There are some crap trainees and graduates out there. I know that. These folks are probably truly worth 200K or less but then again why would any practice even consider or hire these people?
View attachment 377010
It was just hyperbole contrasting the urban vs rural lifestyle. Obviously not: an academic pathologist at Mt. Sinai can't afford to live on Billionaires' row in Central Park, Manhattan.What penthouse or luxury high rise are you talking about on an urban path salary in a high COL urban area? Two bedroom maybe?
There are a lot crappy jobs out there. But, there are also good jobs too where people are happy. As I said before, this is a field of "haves" and "have-nots", and I do think the disparity of the good vs crappy jobs is greater compared to other fields in medicine. For a lot of pathologists it takes time to find a good job which may require moving and going to a less geographically desirable place. Is it fair? "Fair" is a subjective matter. What someone is willing to tolerate and what seems fair is different for everyone.You wonder why US grads don’t apply to Pathology. When you are selling a product that is basically garbage, what competitive US grad wants a piece of it?
Go to radiology, anesthesiology where once you graduate, your employers pay you more than a snickers bar and actually think your worth more than a pile of steaming feces. And there are plenty of jobs in big cities.
Good strong fields you come out valued and get paid like you are valued. In pathology, you get out of training and people pay you 200K because that’s what employers think you are worth.
Radiology and anesthesiology trainees come out of training and are able to hit the ground running and get paid high starting salaries. In pathology, you train, for 5-6 years and employers still think you aren’t even worth a higher starting salary because you can’t sign out crap.
This is partially attributed to post-pandemic market changes i.e. inflation and more retirements (remember that cliff CAP always talked about?). Also, because of dwindling private practices compared to a decade or two ago, health care conglomerates and employed models at hospital systems have raised their base salaries when compared to junior/non-partner levels in private practice. And, as you mentioned, locums rates have gone up. I remember a decade ago it was about $900-1200/day. Now, agencies are paying b/w $1500-2200/day.Locums rates going up now and eventually practices will need to increase full time salaries to finally fill that spot. I think it takes time for the process to occur. Hopefully we will start to see more actual salary quotes on job ads. For every other specialty job ads without some sort of indication of salary are typically looked at as suspect and a potential waste of time. Once we see lots of salary quotes in the job ads, the companies not quoting salaries will be forced to follow along or go unfilled. Then we have the competition and the bids increase. Maybe over the next 2-3 years we will see this.
There’s a lot of crappy jobs—>AgreeIt was just hyperbole contrasting the urban vs rural lifestyle. Obviously not: an academic pathologist at Mt. Sinai can't afford to live on Billionaires' row in Central Park, Manhattan.
There are a lot crappy jobs out there. But, there are also good jobs too where people are happy. As I said before, this is a field of "haves" and "have-nots", and I do think the disparity of the good vs crappy jobs is greater compared to other fields in medicine. For a lot of pathologists it takes time to find a good job which may require moving and going to a less geographically desirable place. Is it fair? "Fair" is a subjective matter. What someone is willing to tolerate and what seems fair is different for everyone.
This is partially attributed to post-pandemic market changes i.e. inflation and more retirements (remember that cliff CAP always talked about?). Also, because of dwindling private practices compared to a decade or two ago, health care conglomerates and employed models at hospital systems have raised their base salaries when compared to junior/non-partner levels in private practice. And, as you mentioned, locums rates have gone up. I remember a decade ago it was about $900-1200/day. Now, agencies are paying b/w $1500-2200/day.
YesWhat's the qualification required in US? Master's degree?
Because, they will still come out ahead financially making double the income in the long run. On top of that, if they're an IMG, they went to school to be a physician. So, there's some personal pride/sense of accomplishment to fulfill that goal.If an IMG can be paid 120K as PA then why bother doing 6 yr residency+fellowship just to make 240K.
Yes
Because, they will still come out ahead financially making double the income in the long run. On top of that, if they're an IMG, they went to school to be a physician. So, there's some personal pride/sense of accomplishment to fulfill that goal.
Let's take an IMG who chose to enter pathology residency instead of becoming a PA in your example. As a 6 yr resident/fellow, they're not making zero. For simple math, as a resident/fellow they would making 60K/yr x 6 yrs = $360K total. As a PA, using your number they would earn 120K x 6 years = 720K over that same 6 yr period they would have been a trainee.
720 - 360K = 360K opportunity cost from being a resident/fellow vs becoming a PA. After that, the resident/fellow (using your salary number) will earn 240K/yr. As a practicing physician they will earn 120K more per year vs a PA x 3 years = 360K. So, their breakeven point is in only 3 years. Then, they have the rest of their career to come out ahead. Let's take an average career of 30 years for simplicity sake: (30 years - 3 years to breakeven = 27 years) x 120K more per year as a pathologist vs PA = 3.24 million dollars more over their lifetime.
So, the better question is why bother going to PA school just to make 120K?
LOL 1500-2000 a day is considered great for a pathologist. Just talked with an anesthesiologist buddy who is getting $450 an hour locums (10 hour shift per day). LOL I’m telling him I thought $1500 was good. In pathology, you got to take anything you can get!It was just hyperbole contrasting the urban vs rural lifestyle. Obviously not: an academic pathologist at Mt. Sinai can't afford to live on Billionaires' row in Central Park, Manhattan.
There are a lot crappy jobs out there. But, there are also good jobs too where people are happy. As I said before, this is a field of "haves" and "have-nots", and I do think the disparity of the good vs crappy jobs is greater compared to other fields in medicine. For a lot of pathologists it takes time to find a good job which may require moving and going to a less geographically desirable place. Is it fair? "Fair" is a subjective matter. What someone is willing to tolerate and what seems fair is different for everyone.
This is partially attributed to post-pandemic market changes i.e. inflation and more retirements (remember that cliff CAP always talked about?). Also, because of dwindling private practices compared to a decade or two ago, health care conglomerates and employed models at hospital systems have raised their base salaries when compared to junior/non-partner levels in private practice. And, as you mentioned, locums rates have gone up. I remember a decade ago it was about $900-1200/day. Now, agencies are paying b/w $1500-2200/day.
My guy. ALL that stuff still happens in training programs today except for maybe taking out the garbage….but wouldn’t be surprised if that still happens today too…hahahaI saw this article in my Doximity account. Being a resident is easier now than back in my day, where you cut meat till midnight, took the garbage to the main hallway due to lack of ancillary services, and spent all morning organizing slides and paperwork for the dozen specialty pathologists, tracked down said pathologists throughout the day then served as their secretary then went back to cutting meat. Maybe you’d pick up a diagnostic Pearl from attending as you glanced into the microscope while furiously transcribing attending’s verbiage.
Everyone in pathology is an IMG here in the States. At least 50%. Some of the residents are good hard working and then there’s a bunch of lazy a$$es too. Why would you pass all your boards just to become a PA? Youre better off becoming a family doc.Good point, for an IMG it could still be worthwhile to find a residency in USA. Here, it is much harder for IMG to find residency, so many give up. The amount of years spent trying for residency might be better off studying to be PA. Maybe for undergrads/high school students, they might be more inclined to consider PA with the shorter training and attractive compensation.