- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 537
- Reaction score
- 28
I've been studying using a 'modified' SN2ed schedule (I basically do passages whenever I want, at least 1 set a day sometimes 2 sets a day, etc, but that's not the main point of this post)
What I'm feeling weird about, is that my intuition is taking over. When I get passages, whether its verbal or science, I sometimes feel like I could be wrong and try to double check an answer, but if I remain confident I usually end up picking the right answer. this is leading to figuring out questions very quickly, and yielding very high scores.
what i'm trying to say is, sometimes i can't even 100% prove on paper or in my head that an answer is a certain answer. however, i get this strong intuitive feeling about an answer and when i go with it, it ends up being right. i went from getting 10-12 wrong on any 4 passages in TBR to getting maybe 4-5 wrong on any 4 TBR passages.
of course, when i do 'post-game' analysis, I can see why i picked a certain answer and i can do the math/reasoning on paper when i have more time to do it. while the intuitive approach is yielding great results, it just feels super weird and for me personally, it doesn't feel good at all. i like to have a very deep conceptual understanding, but sometimes i hate getting an answer right because i could eliminate 3 OBV wrong answers.
What I'm feeling weird about, is that my intuition is taking over. When I get passages, whether its verbal or science, I sometimes feel like I could be wrong and try to double check an answer, but if I remain confident I usually end up picking the right answer. this is leading to figuring out questions very quickly, and yielding very high scores.
what i'm trying to say is, sometimes i can't even 100% prove on paper or in my head that an answer is a certain answer. however, i get this strong intuitive feeling about an answer and when i go with it, it ends up being right. i went from getting 10-12 wrong on any 4 passages in TBR to getting maybe 4-5 wrong on any 4 TBR passages.
of course, when i do 'post-game' analysis, I can see why i picked a certain answer and i can do the math/reasoning on paper when i have more time to do it. while the intuitive approach is yielding great results, it just feels super weird and for me personally, it doesn't feel good at all. i like to have a very deep conceptual understanding, but sometimes i hate getting an answer right because i could eliminate 3 OBV wrong answers.