- Joined
- Aug 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,529
- Reaction score
- 9
Question from TPR Science Workbook (pg 708, Q 2)
When concentrated sulfuric acid is added to ethanol, two different reactions are possible:
CH3CH2OH + H2SO4 ---> CH3CH2OSO3H + H2O
CH3CH2OH + H2SO4 ----> CH2-(double bond)--CH2 + H2O
Which of the following observations about the infrared spectrum would indicate that Rxn 1 (the top one) had occurred?
a) The disappearance of an O-H stretch.
b) The lack of an alkene stretch
c) an increase in the intensity of the C-H stretch
d) the appearance of a sulfonic group stretch.
The answer is B: "In both cases, there will be O-H stretches and sulfonic group stretches. The easiest way to distinguish the rxns is by the presence of absence of the alkene stretch."
Now, call me crazy, but I do NOT see any sulfonic group in rxn 2. I, naturally, chose D because a sulfonic group means rxn 1 has occurred. I thought the O-H stretch disappeared in both, and the C-H stretch wouldn't really get any more intense.
The lack of an alkene stretch does NOT mean producr one has formed - it could also mean the rxn simply didn't proceed! Anyway, I don't se why D isn't the answer.
---------------------------------------
Also, TPR is giving me some worries about the alcohol stretch. I've always thought of O-H as a 3300-3600 broad peak. In one passage, they state there's a 3000 stretch, and that this indicates and alcohol, but in the next passage, they state that a peak of 3100 does NOT indicate an alcohol, and in the answers, they say "an alcohol is 3300-3600."
So what's the deal for the MCAT? 3300-3600? Or is the lower bound actually lower than 3300? And why the hell isn't TPR internally consistent?
When concentrated sulfuric acid is added to ethanol, two different reactions are possible:
CH3CH2OH + H2SO4 ---> CH3CH2OSO3H + H2O
CH3CH2OH + H2SO4 ----> CH2-(double bond)--CH2 + H2O
Which of the following observations about the infrared spectrum would indicate that Rxn 1 (the top one) had occurred?
a) The disappearance of an O-H stretch.
b) The lack of an alkene stretch
c) an increase in the intensity of the C-H stretch
d) the appearance of a sulfonic group stretch.
The answer is B: "In both cases, there will be O-H stretches and sulfonic group stretches. The easiest way to distinguish the rxns is by the presence of absence of the alkene stretch."
Now, call me crazy, but I do NOT see any sulfonic group in rxn 2. I, naturally, chose D because a sulfonic group means rxn 1 has occurred. I thought the O-H stretch disappeared in both, and the C-H stretch wouldn't really get any more intense.
The lack of an alkene stretch does NOT mean producr one has formed - it could also mean the rxn simply didn't proceed! Anyway, I don't se why D isn't the answer.
---------------------------------------
Also, TPR is giving me some worries about the alcohol stretch. I've always thought of O-H as a 3300-3600 broad peak. In one passage, they state there's a 3000 stretch, and that this indicates and alcohol, but in the next passage, they state that a peak of 3100 does NOT indicate an alcohol, and in the answers, they say "an alcohol is 3300-3600."
So what's the deal for the MCAT? 3300-3600? Or is the lower bound actually lower than 3300? And why the hell isn't TPR internally consistent?