Is 2 semesters of basic bench work research enough to check the box?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DocKoozmin

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
101
Reaction score
183
I am currently doing research and I hate it. However, a lot of advisers are telling me to stick with it because they think 2 semesters isn't enough time. It is just so time consuming, and I'm not working toward anything-if I thought I would get a publication, I would suck it up, but as this point, I don't see that happening. Advice?
 
I am currently doing research and I hate it. However, a lot of advisers are telling me to stick with it because they think 2 semesters isn't enough time. It is just so time consuming, and I'm not working toward anything-if I thought I would get a publication, I would suck it up, but as this point, I don't see that happening. Advice?
Are you trying to check a box or become a doctor? If you hate your research and aren't moving toward a worthwhile goal, then get into a different project or lab.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using SDN mobile
 
I am currently doing research and I hate it. However, a lot of advisers are telling me to stick with it because they think 2 semesters isn't enough time. It is just so time consuming, and I'm not working toward anything-if I thought I would get a publication, I would suck it up, but as this point, I don't see that happening. Advice?
A year's worth is quite satisfactory unless you are a strong candidate for the highly-selective, research- oriented med schools. Then you'd aim for at least two years.
 
I am currently doing research and I hate it. However, a lot of advisers are telling me to stick with it because they think 2 semesters isn't enough time. It is just so time consuming, and I'm not working toward anything-if I thought I would get a publication, I would suck it up, but as this point, I don't see that happening. Advice?
I think if your goal is just to check the research box, then I think 2 semesters is enough time. But I think the most important thing is just being able to communicate to adcom what you gained from your experience rather than what you did. Plus the whole publication thing a lot of time is based on luck and timing aside from hard work, so just don't lose too much sleep over that. Plenty of people got into med school without any publications.
 
I think the most important thing is just being able to communicate to adcom what you gained from your experience rather than what you did.
I agree. And part of what you should gain is an understanding of the scientific process and how it pertains to your project, even if your piece of it was only a small portion. Be sure you know the hypothesis, methods for testing it, how the data was collected, what analysis might be done, and if far enough along, conclusions that were drawn and, perhaps, future directions.
 
I am currently doing research and I hate it. However, a lot of advisers are telling me to stick with it because they think 2 semesters isn't enough time. It is just so time consuming, and I'm not working toward anything-if I thought I would get a publication, I would suck it up, but as this point, I don't see that happening. Advice?

Considering how many applicants only have a summer of research on their resume I think 1 year is plenty.
 
Stop immediately. Also, change your perspective if possible. Checking boxes is a nice easy way to understand the beast that is med school applications. However, it sets people up for failure. If all you have to write about at the end of three years are some endeavors you hated and things you aren't passionate about, you better have a WashU MCAT.
 
Could somebody give an hour-wise amount of research that is enough?
 
Could somebody give an hour-wise amount of research that is enough?

Zero. Research is way overestimated by premeds, especially on here. Unless you are shooting for top schools, you don’t need it (assuming you have the other areas of you application built up).

Personally, I think everyone going into a science field should have at least a semester experience just to see if you like it.
 
Zero. Research is way overestimated by premeds, especially on here. Unless you are shooting for top schools, you don’t need it (assuming you have the other areas of you application built up).

Personally, I think everyone going into a science field should have at least a semester experience just to see if you like it.
I do like it. I have approximately 150 hours with it but realistically I don't have time for it.
 
Could somebody give an hour-wise amount of research that is enough?

I'd measure more in weeks rather than hours. A full time summer program (that's what, 300-400 hours??) or a semester for credit (maybe 10 hour wk for 15 weeks= 150) might be the bare minimum for a top research school. Maybe a half day per week for an academic year as a work-study or as a volunteer... that's 4 hours/wk for 30 weeks = 120 hours.
 
Whats more important than learning science?

Advancing it.

I'm for research 10/10.

it shows a plethora of good qualities.

Work ethic, problem-solving skills, genuine care for science, creativity, etc.
 
If you dont want to keep going, have a conversation with your PI and leave the lab on good terms. They will understand, research isnt for everyone.

It's good that you at least gave it a shot to have a research experience on your resume but your application will benefit more by your spending time on something you actually want to put time and energy into. Dont worry about this many hours, semesters, etc, its a poor way to think about putting together your app.
 
I do like it. I have approximately 150 hours with it but realistically I don't have time for it.

Plenty, I think, as long as you can articulate what you got out of it. I actually hated research when I first started it, because I was doing bench research. Once I started doing math research, I got hooked. Not everyone likes it, but I think some people who think they dislike research just don't like bench research.
 
Top