- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 0
Just wondering.
Thanks for any input
Thanks for any input
Just wondering.
Thanks for any input
Hm. Well statistics is a math course...
I have a question in the same vein. If my Calculus 2 course is entirely taught by a teaching assistant; with no input from a professor at all, would i be unable to have him write me a LOR?
I think the bigger question is "Why don't you have a better science letter of recommendation?"
Your LOR's are supposed to sell you. Unless you're going into an MPH program I don't think statistics is relevant enough to most of medicine to show that you care a lot about the underlying basic science of medicine. Biology, chemistry, and physics teachers would be better letter writers.
Hm. Well statistics is a math course...
I have a question in the same vein. If my Calculus 2 course is entirely taught by a teaching assistant; with no input from a professor at all, would i be unable to have him write me a LOR?
I disagree strongly! Statistics is very relevant to medicine and is likely to become a pre-req in the coming decade. That said, the point of the LOR is not to show that you care about a certain subject but for the writer to provide information about your behavior and personality (inquisitive, quick thinking, deep thinking, creative, able to make connections between topics, curious and immaginative, outgoing, hardworking, brilliant, humble, etc) as observed in the classroom and in other settings (office hours, campus events, informal chats, labs, etc). Some LOR writers also provide information about academic performance particularly if the applicant worked hard and came back from a poor showing on a midterm or had a particularly well written paper or presentation or had the top score or among the top x% in a class of [number] competitive students. So, as you can see, it doesn't much matter if the science letter is math, chem, bio or physics. Generally, the non-science letter is from someone who teaches English, a foreign language, social science, or the humanities. With the exception of foreign language, these faculty generally have more opporunity to evaluate essays and classroom discussion and other communication skills as well as humanistic qualities.
Sorry to bump such an old thread, but I didn't want to start a new one. I have to take a graduate level statistics class under the sociology department (I do research there and my PI said it was a better alternative to the basic statistics they offer for undergrads). Would this count as a science letter? I keep getting conflicting information from people who say it counts, stats letters don't count, and stats letters from sociology departments don't count.
Well...
Premise A: [Assuming] That course's primary content type was stats
Premise B: AMCAS (and med schools) define courses by content (not dept)
Conclusion 1: This is a stats course
Premise C: Stats courses are considered part of the BCMP (science) GPA
Premise D: Courses under the BCMP heading are good sources for science LORs
Conclusion 2: This course would be a good source for a science LOR
That said, why not include a 3rd science LOR from your UG science coursework? I believe I have 3 science, 2 non-science, and 2 physician LORs. That way I can play with which ones I send to each school.
Don't get too hung up... call a few schools & ask if engineering courses can count as science. Frankly, I do think that schools will cut you more slack than you realize. That said, I'd generally consider a professor (assistant associate or whatever) of sociology to be "non-science" (it is social science, not natural science).