Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Actually I don't agree with this statement. ***shocking*** That is because it can be observed!!!. The so-called 'macro' evolution takes a wee bit more thought and can't be directly observed (as in a living creature) so they disregard that, which I think is ironic for a population that bases their entire existence on something they can't directly observe.
Anyone who has taken a really good human anthropology course (i.e. human evolution) gets to actually touch and feel a ton of examples of how how humans evolved from non-human primates. I mean, the skull structure of australopithicenes could never be confused with humans. They are clearly primate-like. And then you can see all those "intermediate" forms that rackinghorse says don't exist. I guess they all just died out in the flood along with the dinosaurs (or what bible "scholars" like to say is a "behemoth" mentioned in the bible or dragons or whatever).
Come visit Penn's archaeology museum if you want to see for yourself. I had the honor to study with Dr. Mann before he retired...



