- Joined
- Apr 29, 2005
- Messages
- 1,280
- Reaction score
- 2
wondering you're opinions before i commit this much time to more sitting and listening.
thank you
thank you
I think so. But not as primary study material. More like a good way to bring things that you've read about in various places together into a coherent whole.
Goljan is good, but some caveats...
1. There are hours and hours and hours of Goljan lecturing on Pathology, it requires a bit of a time commitment to get through it.
2. Goljan himself is a strange dude, I think he sort of tries to flex his mental muscles quite a bit in front of his classes, so sometimes when listening to it I would feel a bit inadequate for not seeing his connections. He makes all these statements like, "this will be on your boards, GUARANTEED" and then it's not.
3. That said, felipe is right, you won't be able to sit and read 8-10 hours a day for a month. The people who tell you they did are lying.
Goljan is good, but some caveats...
1. There are hours and hours and hours of Goljan lecturing on Pathology, it requires a bit of a time commitment to get through it.
2. Goljan himself is a strange dude, I think he sort of tries to flex his mental muscles quite a bit in front of his classes, so sometimes when listening to it I would feel a bit inadequate for not seeing his connections. He makes all these statements like, "this will be on your boards, GUARANTEED" and then it's not.
3. That said, felipe is right, you won't be able to sit and read 8-10 hours a day for a month. The people who tell you they did are lying.
Has anyone else noticed that Goljan or someone related to him seem to have about half of the diseases he discusses?
maybe he is consciously confabulating this - is this a method of teaching that allows students to remember things by relating them to someone real??
or is he just a 'pathological' liar? (excuse the pun)
no need to take notes......just get his rapid review path book which is essentially his audio in book form and follow along with the mp3 files.........if you feel like you hear something thats relevant but not in the book, just add it in..........but honestly, it cant be too muchdid most people JUST listen, or did you follow his written notes/path book/or some other source as you listened?
Has anyone else noticed that Goljan or someone related to him seem to have about half of the diseases he discusses?
maybe he is consciously confabulating this - is this a method of teaching that allows students to remember things by relating them to someone real??
or is he just a 'pathological' liar? (excuse the pun)