Way to go for the lowest hanging fruit!
It is from a song lyric: "But you know evil is an exact science, being carefully correctly wrong."
Most people secretly hold the absolute certainty that their view of the world and their place in it is the objective truth. "Correctlywrong" is a reminder to myself that I should never be too certain, always open to new information.
Everything I'd heard about LECOM so far had been positive, and I was a little shocked to hear that it had such vocal detractors. Now, I am reading through the site, thinking critically about what is posted there. I may come out with a more nuanced view, but I haven't seen anything yet that turns me off totally. The dress code and not being able to eat in class... really? These are major complaints? Sounds like people have never had real jobs before. There are big egos in administration at the school? I think this is only so evident because it is a relatively small pond. There are also enormous egos at every other school I am considering, but because those schools are so prestigious, no one calls them out on it.
There was a scandal where the administration attempted to punish a student for reporting a sexual predator? If it is accurate, that is whack, but the rest of that story is that the faculty and the student body rose up to support her, and that they were largely successful in doing so. People who are willing to stand up for what they believe in against opposition sound like my kind of folks. Again, I know of incidents at other schools where students or staff were railroaded and no one came out to help them. It just quietly happened, and their peers acted like, well, if you didn't really do something wrong, the school wouldn't be taking action against you.
[EDIT: Speaking of which, some of the complaints begin with an admission that the author was using marijuana or drinking alcohol during the day, and that they were referred for substance abuse evaluation/treatment. Come on! Health care providers are at enormous risk for substance abuse issues. We have access and opportunity, and our impairment can hurt not only ourselves, but our patients. Does anyone really believe that other institutions would ignore such behavior? Not dealing with it makes them liable.]
Also, the site is juvenile, literally. It is filled with GIFs of children making offensive gestures. Is that really how they want to portray themselves? Because that is precisely how most of their complaints read. Maybe there are real problems with the school now, beyond the superficial complaints and references to nearly 20 year old issues from the inaugural class... but the site does not communicate about them in a way that inspires any confidence in its authors. They come off as immature whiners who probably don't have any business being entrusted to practice medicine.
If someone were to write a thoughtful and intelligent critique of the school which demonstrated that it had defects not seen in other schools, I would be grateful to them. I haven't seen anything like that there. Please, correct me if I am wrong.