I will only be taking BIO 1 and Chm 1 at the community but will this effect my chances at med schools?
Didn't hurt me one bit.
Things are very different now days than when you applied (must have been over 5 years ago, at least)
- Yes. It will hurt you to take CC science courses...or any courses for that matter, because it will make you less competitive.
Everyone loves to make this a blanket yes or no question....but is it really?
Are you telling me that someone who starts out at a community college then transfers and gets a bio or chem or physics degree by taking a ton of upper division science classes is screwed if they took Chem I at community college?
That can't be right.
There is no blanket yes or no answer to anything related to the med school admission process. However, the quality and rigor of the undergraduate institution definitely play a role. One course is not going to make a difference, unless you are being compared to someone who has your exact same credentials and took it elsewhere...and what are the chances of that happening?
This response is troublesome. Taking a chem class at a CC versus taking a chem class at a lower tier school with a high curve versus take a chem class at tier one class. Not all community colleges are created equal and this is most certainly the case with 4 year colleges.
To honestly say that all cc courses will make you less competitive is a very general statement. This is however not the case in States like mine ( MD) or VA where the state university is the both the cheapest and at the sametime one of the hardest to get into. So in all honesty, at Maryland CC's you have many extremely qualified and intelligent teachers.
However this isn't the case probably in Pennsylvania for example where there are much easier requirements to get into their state university. In that state Community colleges are basically really crappy ( which could very well be wrong). But in all honesty community colleges are economically a great choice for most people. I know that my friend who goes to GWU said he'd pay for 1 summer class the same it cost me for a whole semester.
Anyways.. I digress, not all CC's are created equal. Not all CC teachers are created equal. This is why we have the Mcat.
Quoted for awesomeness.
There was no way financially I could have taken my prereqs anywhere but a CC. To say that irrevocably makes me a bad applicant is just spreading the cancer that is the idea of the "traditional path" being the only right way. Not everyone gets there the same way.
I hope that becomes the case.The truth is that medical schools are bound to realize this and will accept a non traditional path because it is truly the only possibility for so many people.
Quoted for awesomeness.
There was no way financially I could have taken my prereqs anywhere but a CC. To say that irrevocably makes me a bad applicant is just spreading the cancer that is the idea of the "traditional path" being the only right way. Not everyone gets there the same way.
Well thats the thing. The traditional path/ route is no longer something many want to or are willing to take. I mean I got into a expensive university but got 0 cash and 0 financial aid. I realize that I don't want nor do I need 250k debt prior to getting another 300k+ debt in medical school.
The traditional path is archaic, not everyone can afford to go to Yale or some private university for the sake of saying that my education was better then the guy at the public school. Not to mention in this economic period? I mean everyone who didn't get a major scholarship(s) is going to cc's. This is the trend that will only increase as people realize that the huge debt is simply not worth it. The truth is that medical schools are bound to realize this and will accept a non traditional path because it is truly the only possibility for so many people.
Amazing, but not a surprising comment coming from these forums. No one has been that dramatic. You are not irrevocably a bad applicant, but you are DEFINITELY less competitive than someone who has taken all courses at a more rigorous and prestigious school.
Adcoms are known to question students during interviews about WHY they took CC courses, especially pre reqs. It has always been a red flag, especially if they are taken while you are enrolled at another institution. If there is a reasonable explanation or life story, then things change a bit.
Amazing, but not a surprising comment coming from these forums. No one has been that dramatic. You are not irrevocably a bad applicant, but you are DEFINITELY less competitive than someone who has taken all courses at a more rigorous and prestigious school.
Adcoms are known to question students during interviews about WHY they took CC courses, especially pre reqs. It has always been a red flag, especially if they are taken while you are enrolled at another institution. If there is a reasonable explanation or life story, then things change a bit.
That is pure rationalization. With the current level of competition, med school adcoms have plenty of students to choose from and "qualifications" are the key. Every year GPAs and MCATs are getting higher, ECs are becoming more sophisticated and you better keep up to remain competitive.
Well by all means, don't act like your free of rationalization. We are all humans and as such have aspects of pride. Obviously someone who's gone through a over priced 'prestigious' university will be proud of it and defend it. I'm simply saying that the traditional path is not the only way and that deviation from it will not bar you from getting accepted.
Yes, all of those things are indeed getting higher and of course going to a private prestigious university will make your chances all the more higher. But like I said that's not the goal of my post.
But regardless, the mcat is the great equalizer for admissions. Don't for a moment believe that because you go to ( insert grade inflated private institute here) your safe from admissions. They know that if you go to Harvard for example where the average gpa is 3.6; they won't be that impressed by a 3.6.
So in all honesty, going to a private school makes you seem like the child of grade inflation. Just in the same way that you believe that going to a CC is negative for medical school admissions.
No one is saying that a 4 year school is the ONLY way to get accepted or that a 4 year school guarantees an acceptance. We are simply saying that if you think you are going to be seen as a 100% equal to someone who excelled in their science classes at a 4 year school, you are sadly mistaken, no matter how unfair that may be. You can definitely get accepted if taking a few science classes at a CC, but it definitely leaves you less room for an issue with the rest of your application. Even if you do prove that you can handle a 4 year school, at many schools you will still be asked about it in the interview. Just like I said, my gf took one science class at a CC, got all A's and one B+ in science courses at her 4 year school, had a good mcat, and a 3.8 cgpa and sgpa, yet was still grilled about taking physics 2 at a CC.
Sounds like she was at a 4 year university and yet took physics II at a community college, which WOULD cause adcoms to raise an eyebrow.
Community college ----> University = acceptable
University ----> Community college = unusual
Adcoms DON'T care if you took prereqs at a community college as long as you have taken upper level science courses at a university and have gotten good grades in them. But taking a course at a community college after matriculating at a university is odd and they will ask you about it.
Sounds like she was at a 4 year university and yet took physics II at a community college, which WOULD cause adcoms to raise an eyebrow.
Community college ----> University = acceptable
University ----> Community college = unusual
Adcoms DON'T care if you took prereqs at a community college as long as you have taken upper level science courses at a university and have gotten good grades in them. But taking a course at a community college after matriculating at a university is odd and they will ask you about it.
Sounds like she was at a 4 year university and yet took physics II at a community college, which WOULD cause adcoms to raise an eyebrow.
Community college ----> University = acceptable
University ----> Community college = unusual
Adcoms DON'T care if you took prereqs at a community college as long as you have taken upper level science courses at a university and have gotten good grades in them. But taking a course at a community college after matriculating at a university is odd and they will ask you about it.
My brother just finished dental school and i asked him about his science classes, which are about the same as medical, he was telling me that the cc courses were way harder than the university because the cc tries to copy the university exactly. While the university has the guidelines but goes with what works.
It is too bad, if true, that med schools look down upon cc courses.
That being said if you are already at a very prestigious school i can understand you would have the upper hand in being more competitive. There is nothing unfair about that situation.
I think that this must vary enormously from cc to cc, which might be part of the problem. Where I went to school, people flocked in droves to the local cc to take course such as physics and calc, that had reputations as GPA-killers at the university, and as being much much easier at the cc. A friend of mine took calc at a cc in another state, and said they didn't even cover derivatives or integrals (what the hell DID they cover?!?). I'm sure adcoms are well aware of disparities between curriculum and rigor at many cc's vs. universities. They're also probably well aware of cc's known to have high standards.
I'd be most inclined to agree with morning's post. If you're enrolled in a cc, and hope to eventually transfer to a university, I doubt it would be held against you. If you're just trying to avoid courses at your university by selectively taking them at a cc, it may very well appear that you're trying to take the easy way out. That said, the vast majority of us are lowly premeds stating opinions...you'd be better off contacting an adcom to be certain.
It was the abacus version of calc
Well by all means, don't act like your free of rationalization. We are all humans and as such have aspects of pride. Obviously someone who's gone through a over priced 'prestigious' university will be proud of it and defend it. I'm simply saying that the traditional path is not the only way and that deviation from it will not bar you from getting accepted.
Yes, all of those things are indeed getting higher and of course going to a private prestigious university will make your chances all the more higher. But like I said that's not the goal of my post.
But regardless, the mcat is the great equalizer for admissions. Don't for a moment believe that because you go to ( insert grade inflated private institute here) your safe from admissions. They know that if you go to Harvard for example where the average gpa is 3.6; they won't be that impressed by a 3.6.
So in all honesty, going to a private school makes you seem like the child of grade inflation. Just in the same way that you believe that going to a CC is negative for medical school admissions.
Abacus?
I think that your post is extremely disingenuous and you seem to have a rather bizarre bias against private and other elite schools. This does nothing but to continue to spread myths.
The following is a quote from Dr Nancy Nolan, adcom to an ivy league med school:
....."we also consider the quality and reputation of the undergraduate institution. We know that schools and departments differ in academic rigor and that an A from one school is really a B somewhere else. We have a large database of applicants from nearly every four-year college in the US and can easily see the mean and median GPA from your school. We know the level of difficulty you faced. While your performance on the MCAT will also document this, rest assured that the committee considers the academic bias of your school in our admission decision."
This is the advice that we all need to follow. And as far as Harvard, it is not the GPA what is going to impress anyone, it's the institution.
It was a joke. It is unclear how it is calculus if you don't do derivatives and integrals.
Abacus:
![]()
I think that your post is extremely disingenuous and you seem to have a rather bizarre bias against private and other elite schools. This does nothing but to continue to spread myths.
The following is a quote from Dr Nancy Nolan, adcom to an ivy league med school:
....."we also consider the quality and reputation of the undergraduate institution. We know that schools and departments differ in academic rigor and that an A from one school is really a B somewhere else. We have a large database of applicants from nearly every four-year college in the US and can easily see the mean and median GPA from your school. We know the level of difficulty you faced. While your performance on the MCAT will also document this, rest assured that the committee considers the academic bias of your school in our admission decision."
This is the advice that we all need to follow. And as far as Harvard, it is not the GPA what is going to impress anyone, it's the institution.
It was a joke. It is unclear how it is calculus if you don't do derivatives and integrals.
Well that being said, your a victim of your own pride for attending a overpriced institution.
And your post doesn't really disagree with my statement.
I just finished ochem sequence at a CC, and two people got 70s and someone else got a 69. Pretty sure they cheated though. No way anyone from a CC could do that well. 🙄P.S. I just took my ACS Organic Chemistry exam and got in the 100th percentile. 69/70.. F you admissions committee, I'm every bit as qualified as the kids who could afford to pay their way through universities.
I took biology, chemistry, physics (calculus-based), and calculus at a community college and was accepted to Medical School (class of 2014). The stigma about community college classes being lower quality is simply not true. In fact, I found this to be quite the opposite.
I have commented on this subject elsewhere, but in short, my community college was NOT curved. Consequently, if you earned a 4.0 then it reflects as a 95%> in a particular course. In comparison, my 4.0s at the University of Washington ranged from 75% to 100% depending on the course. It is my opinion that Medical Schools are aware of the massive grade inflation that occurs at Universities and thus might look favorably on Community College grades.
I should point out that my "excuse" for taking the sciences at a community college was that I was in running-start, and that program is for high school students to take community college courses (as opposed to the academy that allows high school students to take University courses).
Hey, I'm planning to transfer to the UW this upcoming year. Would love to ask you a few questions through PM.
Things are very different now days than when you applied (must have been over 5 years ago, at least)
- Yes. It will hurt you to take CC science courses...or any courses for that matter, because it will make you less competitive.
I will only be taking BIO 1 and Chm 1 at the community but will this effect my chances at med schools?
Is it a bad idea to take some random EXTRA (not prereq) math or biology classes at CC to boost sGPA?
Sounds like she was at a 4 year university and yet took physics II at a community college, which WOULD cause adcoms to raise an eyebrow.
Community college ----> University = acceptable
University ----> Community college = unusual
Adcoms DON'T care if you took prereqs at a community college as long as you have taken upper level science courses at a university and have gotten good grades in them. But taking a course at a community college after matriculating at a university is odd and they will ask you about it.