Originally posted by jsorrell:
Detroit,
I can't speak for others, but in my case, I did not take a prep course. Being a full time biology graduate student(where I am maintaining a 4.0 GPA), and a part time teaching assistant, I did not have much time to prepare for the MCAT at all. Considering that, I did pretty well by scoring a 6, 6, 8, N. So, I really do not feel the need to defend myself. I do not see how I am any less proficient at reading when I score a six on the verbal, the portion deemed most difficult. Furthermore, I do not see how my 6 can be compared with somebody else's 10, when that person took a prep course and was taught SPECIFICALLY how to take the test.
The first time I took the test, with absolutely zero prep, I got a 9 in Verbal. The second time I took the test, after taking a prep course, and doing about 20 Verbal passages a day, AND taking 5 full-length practice tests, and also taking several verbal section only run-throughs, (I'm really setting myself up here
) I got .... (drum roll) another 9!!! Granted I did much better in the other sections, but still, after taking my prep course which supposedly teaches me "how to take the test", I got the same score, and not for lack of studying or trying. So not all people who didn't have enough time to prepare got 6's, and also not all gunners who prepped like mad got double digit scores. My second point - I did not get into med school the first time I applied. When I took the MCAT the first time, I had just returned from study abroad in Australia, so I wasn't exactly in the right mode. I also was way behind on bills, so I was working 60 hours a week to catch up. I worked about 50 hours a week during my undergrad to pay my tuition and living expenses, so my GPA was a little lower than the average applicant too (but still high enough to graduate with honors - barely). My point is, I had average numbers at best and thought it was okay to apply anyway because I had reasons for it. The problem is, there is a big difference between my reasons. Lower GPA? Good reason. Lower MCAT, because I didn't study AT ALL? Horrible excuse. I've known for years I wanted to go to med school, so the importance of the MCAT should not have been lost on me. For something so integral to deciding whether or not I get to realize a life-long goal, studying for the MCAT needed to be a #1 priority. I probably could have shifted things around and taken on less that semester, but I chose not to, instead telling myself that I had a good reason for doing bad if that should be the case. Med schools will be understanding about things that you cannot change (working your way through school), but they are a little less understanding about things like not studying for the MCAT. I mean, it's one test, and it means a great deal. You only need to adust your life for a few months to prepare for it. I remember people in my classes who would brag about getting a 80 on a test when they "didn't even study for it". Is my 90 not comparable to their 80 because I worked my butt off for it? Does this mean that I am somehow less intelligent because I didn't wing it and slide by? I put in the effort and the other student didn't. Who cares if they /could/ score high if they /tried/ ? They didn't. I was always amused by that sort of bragging (not to say you were, I mean people in my classes). Who cares if 80% is not bad for not trying? Wouldn't you rather have the doc who cared enough to learn 90%? This is what went through my head when I considered retaking the MCAT. This is what I thought med schools would think, if I tried to make my bad scores look good by pointing out how smart I /really/ am because look what I got without studying. It gives off an air of a student who is not willing to put in the effort because they are have an excuse for mediocrity. So I took it again. I shifted around my life, and made time to study for the most important test of my life thus far. Last time I applied, I didn't get any interviews. This time, I've already been accepted to my #1 school, two others, and one wait-list. (I haven't heard from my other interview yet.) My MCAT scores weren't the only part of my application that I improved between application cycles, but I still feel that taking it again made me able to make it through more "numbers cuts". Uhh...I just noticed how much I've digressed! My main point is that I feel that the above-mentioned 6 and 10 are comparable, and that effort put into preparing, whether on your own or in a prep course, makes the difference.
[This message has been edited by Doc Oc (edited 11-27-2000).]