- Joined
- Jun 28, 2011
- Messages
- 3,477
- Reaction score
- 1,676
You basically have to be in the top 10-20% in college and you will get into an MD school. Note that 80-90% of most pre-meds won't be in the top 20%. That's why it's hard.
You basically have to be in the top 10-20% in college and you will get into an MD school. Note that 80-90% of most pre-meds won't be in the top 20%. That's why it's hard.
the reason I started this thread is to try and combat this kind of absurd self-aggrandizing hyperbole
Is anyone else out there glad this guy isn't going in medicine?? The bar is pretty high already, but this dude is off the charts:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/05/magazine/ronan-farrow-reluctant-tv-star.html?hpw&rref=magazine
err, that's exactly what the numbers say. A 30 MCAT is in the mid-80s percentile. A 3.6 GPA is ostensibly in the top 10-20%. That gets you in with a reasonable level of success.
These are averages, so of course, there will be some people who sneak in with below average numbers. However, that's not a recipe for success. In anything, being above average is where you want to be. The problem is that the average is pretty damn high with respect to MD admissions, so getting to that point is fairly difficult overall.
I don't see any hyperbole. This thread is ridiculous.the reason I started this thread is to try and combat this kind of absurd self-aggrandizing hyperbole
GPA at least 3.0: 48%
GPA at least 3.4: 55.5%
MCAT at least 30: 68%
GPA at least 3.4 and MCAT at least 30: 69%
the reason I started this thread is to try and combat this kind of absurd self-aggrandizing hyperbole
Got me thinking about how these stats are skewed by people who really have no business applying to med school.
err, that's exactly what the numbers say. A 30 MCAT is in the mid-80s percentile. A 3.6 GPA is ostensibly in the top 10-20%. That gets you in with a reasonable level of success.
These are averages, so of course, there will be some people who sneak in with below average numbers. However, that's not a recipe for success. In anything, being above average is where you want to be. The problem is that the average is pretty damn high with respect to MD admissions, so getting to that point is fairly difficult overall.
-For some reason you thought it made sense to compare the chances of getting into ONE prestigious Ivy League school for undergrad to the chances of getting into ANY US medical school (and I bet that number includes DO schools).
Sure, things are blown out of proportion around here. I think the clear bottom line, on which hopefully we can all agree, is that medical school has the most rigorous and selective admissions standards out of any professional school track (dent and vet are close behind; those three are a clear tier above opto/law/pharm/etc et al and so on
The way you report the data has tremendous bias. For all we know, the bulk of acceptances occur at a threshold far above a 3.0, 3.4, or 30. If so, the data you presented is self-serving and meaningless.
Also, maybe a lot of people who get it in with below-median stats are in special categories that disqualify most applicants.
No, it doesn't. You just totally pulled that out of thin air. Admissions criteria and matriculant statistics for US MD are objectively higher than the other categories I mentioned. You can look this up if you don't believe me.your last paragraph reminds me that all the hyperbole and self-aggrandizement that goes on around here makes people think that because they got into med school they could've just showed up and made a six-figure salary in any other field. that's why you get all those "I should've just gone into investment banking" threads.
Here's a question noone is asking: who cares?I bet that noob can't tell me the difference between an SN1 and an SN2 reaction! Ha!
Difficult or easy for WHO? One person's cinch is the next person's struggle. A person's overall intelligence can be approximated with IQ tests, which show that the average person, even in the USA, is not very smart. The pre-med pool is still a diverse group.
The (intelligent yet) uninformed: There are people who have known that GPA + MCAT = Medical School since their high school years, and planned accordingly, and people who had no clue that either mattered much.
The (intelligent yet) underserved or distracted: There are people who were able to focus almost solely on GPA, MCAT, and other pre-reqs. There are other premeds who got stuck dealing with extenuating circumstances.
The (intelligent or less intelligent) person with a social mission: The person who isn't a premed because s/he thinks s/he's smart, but because s/he has noticed something in society and medicine that makes him/her think s/he has something special to offer future patients. This includes but isn't limited to people who want to serve the poor, a minority group, a disadvantaged area, change the healthcare system, and/or know they will try harder than most other people (perhaps anyone else) at something important to them. This medical school candidate might speak a lesser known language or be familiar with areas of the world or a member of a subculture or minority group that's truly in need - and that most people don't understand well enough to help.
The really smart dumb people: These are the people who are extremely gifted in some areas, and almost equally lacking in other areas. Some people are extremely good with language skills and people and just lacking in math and science; or just the opposite.
Perceptions: Those who believe that they are smarter or dumber than they really are - which might be just about everyone, except when it's to an extreme. When noting that perceptions =/= reality, professional IQ tests become necessary in answering this kind of question by OP.
Those who need a challenge: I'm sure there are some people on here who are very intelligent AND have everything they need to maximize their achievements. In my experience, super smart people are often in need of a challenge and are sometimes tired of less intelligent people being catered to.
Conclusion: If you know what you are doing and have superior intelligence, and don't encounter other obstacles, getting into medical school is probably "easy" for you. However, I personally believe that a certain number of those who don't find it "easy" are also needed in medicine.
I kind of skimmed your post but I think I agree with most of your message. One thing I want to clarify: IQ tests are scored such that the mean score (not sure if on a national basis, global basis, or simply within the network of a particular test provider or test type) is 100, with scores normally distributed with a standard deviation of 15 points. The "average person" therefore has an IQ of 100. a 130 is as rare as a 70 and puts you in the top (or bottom) 5%. A 145 is as rare as a 55 and puts you in the top/bottom .3%Difficult or easy for WHO? One person's cinch is the next person's struggle. A person's overall intelligence can be approximated with IQ tests, which show that the average person, even in the USA, is not very smart. The pre-med pool is still a diverse group.
I kind of skimmed your post but I think I agree with most of your message. One thing I want to clarify: IQ tests are scored such that the mean score (not sure if on a national basis, global basis, or simply within the network of a particular test provider or test type) is 100, with scores normally distributed with a standard deviation of 15 points. The "average person" therefore has an IQ of 100. a 130 is as rare as a 70 and puts you in the top (or bottom) 5%. A 145 is as rare as a 55 and puts you in the top/bottom .3%
Is anyone else out there glad this guy isn't going into medicine?? The bar is pretty high already, but this dude is off the charts:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/05/magazine/ronan-farrow-reluctant-tv-star.html?hpw&rref=magazine
Whoa, you must have met different students than me. 90% of them didn't give a damn about their grades so long as they passed. They'd rather be out drinking and partying than put in the extra few hours to pull their grade up by a letter.Not really sure what you mean by this. Getting decent grades (As and Bs) should be a pretty universal goal for college students. Personally I didn't do anything special "from the beginning" other than getting As and Bs in my science classes which, combined with easier As in humanities classes comes out to a 3.4+ GPA.
Your point is valid in regard to the MCAT but I feel like with GPAs grade inflation plays too much of a role to say that somebody with a 3.6 is automatically in the top 20%. There are some schools out there where you get an A- just for showing up and others where a B+ is a really good grade.