Let's say I am acting as a peer-reviewer for a letter to a journal (let's say Red Journal) and this stuff by Steinberg fails at every level.
"Unsuitable for publication!"
The chair from City of Angels and previous ASTRO President has nothing to do with his credibility.
Why do people like Brian and Percy drink the same KoolAid as Steinberg?
Why do they need to suck up to this level of arrogance and ignorance?
If ROHub removed his post (or he withdrew his post), this is the only time I would defend ASTRO for doing such a good service because his post is deeply offensive to ASTRO members...
OK, let's see...
"...saddened and disappointed" ---> What is going on in his head and neck area?
"...Thankfully, the offensive post was taken down..." ---> What happened to free speech. His own post is deeply offensive!!!
He spoke to ABMS leadership, he has been around this long and cannot figure out the relationship between ABR and ABMS? ---> smh...
"...uninformed personal opinion..." ---> He just attacked many ASTRO members.
"...none of these boards have ever administered virtual exams..." ---> Of course not, for obvious reasons.
"...unlike college-based, text centric, "low-stakes" exam, ours is image rich, high density, "high stakes" exam..." He just insulted thousands of college kids. My kids took the ACT and SAT exams and I do not think our ABR exam is any different, conceptually speaking. An exam is an exam, whether it is a pilot license exam (to fly an airplane) or ACT/SAT or ABR is an exam that needs to be taken seriously.
"...The public who looks at the Board for verification of competence..." ---> Of course the MOC and OLA is an offspring of that but it is partially true. There is more to it.
"...Rancor, misplaced anger spewed...misinformed postings..." ---> He just attacked many ASTRO members.
"...Some posts appear to display a misunderstanding..." ---> How many times does he have to insult ASTRO members?
ABR is 50 years behind time...
Philosophically, now you guys know why this country is in flames. The "people" complained about police brutality and what do they get?
Even more "police brutality" as you see on TV. The good news is democracy always wins, you just have to give democracy some time to work...
So, who are the "people"? The "people" are the radonc residents.
Time to stand up for our residents and protect them, because they are the future of our field.
No need for an easier exam, they never asked for an easier exam, they just want a virtual exam so they can move on.
This is why radonc fails as field, just look at a typical surgery exam, it is a conversation, looking for deep knowledge.
The surg examiners do not ask the resident to tie a knot or to operate a laparoscope, these are skills you learn in residency.
If you cannot master these surg skills, then your surg PD should not graduate you. And you should NOT practice as a surgeon.
Likewise for radonc, the art of drawing GTV, CTV, PTV etc. is for residency. Impossible to assess all these skills in 30-min session.
Here is surg oral, it is basically a conversation. The examiners do NOT ask the candidate to perform surg procedures.
If you look carefully, the surg examiners are looking for a SAFE surgeon...
The General Surgery Certifying Examination, an oral exam, is the second and last step toward board certification in general surgery.
www.absurgery.org