Thank you for the insights! For the smaller specialties, do you think the ranking difference between Keck and UCI plays much of a difference? For example, I know that USC Roski is pretty well regarded but I’m not sure how much that would really help and if it’s worth the extra cost.
It’s not so much the ranking as it is the connections. Bigger name people and larger departments means they’ll know more folks, which can help out. You probably get more access to research. If you’re trying to (or wind up needing to) match out of region, there’s a better chance someone there will recognize your LOR authors.
My n=1 - I had a pretty good but not fantastic app at a name brand school with a name brand program. Even in the field today, plenty of people wouldn’t recognize my mentors, but one was good friends with two prominent chairs and the other had been a beloved relatively recent trainee somewhere, so I scored three T15 interviews. It’s such a small community that the younger one used a LOR from
me when they were up for promotion.
That said, you have to be able to create a competitive app first or the boost means nothing. Can’t put the cart before the horse. Both ophtho and derm hover around only a 70% match rate. Plenty of good apps lose at musical chairs no matter where you come from.
Is the boost worth $120k? That’s not chump change. At least it wouldn’t be private, but that’s still an awful lot of money, and even federal loans are sitting at 8% now.
It probably sounds snobby overall because it is to a degree in smaller fields. If you feel like you’d have a better chance of succeeding at building your application at USC with the additional fringe benefits, maybe it’s worth the big bucks. If you feel like you’d can win at UCI and save the money, it’s not like you’re DOA/in trouble. Not an easy choice, but your pro/con reads like you prefer USC. Hopefully they pony up some money, because, as previously, it’s breaking the $100k barrier.