You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Keck vs UC Irvine
Started by holajola
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Congrats on a great cycle! Both are great schools held in comparable esteem within medicine. Speculating on their match outcomes based on anecdotal responses is probably not helpful (especially when you seem to have clear reasons to be biased towards USC). But if it's helpful, this is a link to UCI's 2026 match ceremony where students announced their placements and this is a link to USC's 2024 Match list. I suspect you'll find that similar proportions of students match into competitive specialties.
Between these two, it would be hard for me to justify $120k more in debt. Would going to Keck require you to take out private loans?
Between these two, it would be hard for me to justify $120k more in debt. Would going to Keck require you to take out private loans?
Not quite. I’ll preface this by saying many premeds overrate the importance of “prestige”, but USC is perceived as a tier above as both a school and the subsequent departments clinically. I only know Irvine has an ophtho residency because I met a faculty member at a meeting. It does help to have connections within small fields like the ones mentioned, but you still have to have already built your app.held in comparable esteem within medicine
That said, I agree that prior matches are a weak indicator and that’s a pretty big price tag if USC doesn’t budge. Even before the private loan era, the SDN rule of thumb was to really consider the cheaper school at a $100k difference, and you’re there. UCI is a good school as far as I know, so sticker shock isn’t dooming you if it stays a major factor.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I’m not sure where you got the idea that UCI students don’t match competitively, because they do. If you’re cut out for a ROADS specialty, then you will succeed at either of these programs. It’s truly that simple. It sounds like you’re learning towards Keck, which is fine. Whether or not you’re willing to pay an extra 100+ with 10% interest, that’s up to you, but I would pick UCI. Plus, you get to go relax on the beach after exams.
I would pick uci. Both are great schools. One requires less private loans
Thank you for the insights! For the smaller specialties, do you think the ranking difference between Keck and UCI plays much of a difference? For example, I know that USC Roski is pretty well regarded but I’m not sure how much that would really help and if it’s worth the extra cost.Not quite. I’ll preface this by saying many premeds overrate the importance of “prestige”, but USC is perceived as a tier above as both a school and the subsequent departments clinically. I only know Irvine has an ophtho residency because I met a faculty member at a meeting. It does help to have connections within small fields like the ones mentioned, but you still have to have already built your app.
That said, I agree that prior matches are a weak indicator and that’s a pretty big price tag if USC doesn’t budge. Even before the private loan era, the SDN rule of thumb was to really consider the cheaper school at a $100k difference, and you’re there. UCI is a good school as far as I know, so sticker shock isn’t dooming you if it stays a major factor.
That is great to hear and after talking to UCI students it does seem that they match well for anesthesiology and others.I’m not sure where you got the idea that UCI students don’t match competitively, because they do. If you’re cut out for a ROADS specialty, then you will succeed at either of these programs. It’s truly that simple. It sounds like you’re learning towards Keck, which is fine. Whether or not you’re willing to pay an extra 100+ with 10% interest, that’s up to you, but I would pick UCI. Plus, you get to go relax on the beach after exams.
It’s not so much the ranking as it is the connections. Bigger name people and larger departments means they’ll know more folks, which can help out. You probably get more access to research. If you’re trying to (or wind up needing to) match out of region, there’s a better chance someone there will recognize your LOR authors.Thank you for the insights! For the smaller specialties, do you think the ranking difference between Keck and UCI plays much of a difference? For example, I know that USC Roski is pretty well regarded but I’m not sure how much that would really help and if it’s worth the extra cost.
My n=1 - I had a pretty good but not fantastic app at a name brand school with a name brand program. Even in the field today, plenty of people wouldn’t recognize my mentors, but one was good friends with two prominent chairs and the other had been a beloved relatively recent trainee somewhere, so I scored three T15 interviews. It’s such a small community that the younger one used a LOR from me when they were up for promotion.
That said, you have to be able to create a competitive app first or the boost means nothing. Can’t put the cart before the horse. Both ophtho and derm hover around only a 70% match rate. Plenty of good apps lose at musical chairs no matter where you come from.
Is the boost worth $120k? That’s not chump change. At least it wouldn’t be private, but that’s still an awful lot of money, and even federal loans are sitting at 8% now.
It probably sounds snobby overall because it is to a degree in smaller fields. If you feel like you’d have a better chance of succeeding at building your application at USC with the additional fringe benefits, maybe it’s worth the big bucks. If you feel like you’d can win at UCI and save the money, it’s not like you’re DOA/in trouble. Not an easy choice, but your pro/con reads like you prefer USC. Hopefully they pony up some money, because, as previously, it’s breaking the $100k barrier.
Last edited:
tren
Full Member
I would send an email to Dr. Phung and let him know about your other offers. Ppl think Keck is broke but they have a pretty decent amount of scholarship money surprisingly. message me if you want a little template but I think you have a good chance given your alumni status at USC
I’ll weigh in. I’m in private practice in a somewhat competitive residency field on the central coast and have partners from USC, UC Davis, UC SD, UCLA and UCSF though none from Irvine. I went to a name brand high tier med school and residency in the Midwest.
The USC partner would say there was a difference with Irvine and USC. That USC is in the same tier as UCSF and UCLA while all the UC trained people and myself would roll their eyes and hire whoever interviewed better.
Save the money. Go to Irvine. Make connections during med school and residency and you’ll be fine.
The USC partner would say there was a difference with Irvine and USC. That USC is in the same tier as UCSF and UCLA while all the UC trained people and myself would roll their eyes and hire whoever interviewed better.
Save the money. Go to Irvine. Make connections during med school and residency and you’ll be fine.
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.