- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
- Messages
- 1,724
- Reaction score
- 9
Can some explain why in
N2(g) + 3H2(g) ----> 2NH3(g) + Heat
physically reducing volume shifts equilibrium rightwards to reduce # or gaseous moles (reactant gas moles > product gas moles) BUT adding an inert gas (Ar) DOES NOT.
If you add enough inert gas, well effective volume decreases since they DO take up some volume, or is there an assumption of Ideal Gas law where gases occupy no volume so adding inert gas does not change volume.
I also know that partial pressure of reactants and products is unaffected by the introduction of the inert gas so from this perspective it makes sense why equilibrium does not shift, however from volume reduction perspective, it doesn't make sense to me considering the real attributes of gases (they do occupy space.)
Thanks
N2(g) + 3H2(g) ----> 2NH3(g) + Heat
physically reducing volume shifts equilibrium rightwards to reduce # or gaseous moles (reactant gas moles > product gas moles) BUT adding an inert gas (Ar) DOES NOT.
If you add enough inert gas, well effective volume decreases since they DO take up some volume, or is there an assumption of Ideal Gas law where gases occupy no volume so adding inert gas does not change volume.
I also know that partial pressure of reactants and products is unaffected by the introduction of the inert gas so from this perspective it makes sense why equilibrium does not shift, however from volume reduction perspective, it doesn't make sense to me considering the real attributes of gases (they do occupy space.)
Thanks