Dude there are no tiers its DO school.
I have been searching for a list of low tier DO schools and found none on this forum. Does someone have a list of low tier DO school plus new school. This could be a sticky for new applicants.
The whole "tier" thing is made up by pre-meds to try to give justification about their school choice trying to belittle the others who did not accept them. It's a bunch of crap and you need not get sucked into the delusional hype it creates. Any medical school in the country is fine, you will be a doctor in the end. No one cares once you finish where you go.
Yeah ok.
He's right. The only advantage one DO school gives you over another is local/regional recognition from certain residency programs that have had experience with that school's grads (and likes them).
This whole notion that going to PCOM or CCOM or DMUCOM or KCOM or whatever is going to confer some awesome training or greater prestige is laughable to those of us that have been through it. It's a DO school. It's not prestigious.
He's right. The only advantage one DO school gives you over another is local/regional recognition from certain residency programs that have had experience with that school's grads (and likes them).
This whole notion that going to PCOM or CCOM or DMUCOM or KCOM or whatever is going to confer some awesome training or greater prestige is laughable to those of us that have been through it. It's a DO school. It's not prestigious.
There are big differences between DO schools IMO. The schools you listed have better resources, history, and opportunities for students than other schools. Im not saying those schools are prestigious but they are better (again in my own opinion) than others.
BUT medical school is what YOU make of it.
Wat.
Pretty clear. No one is going to be enamored by the DMU on your resume. Believe me.
I never said that anyone would be enamored (what an odd word choice).
However, I will be respected for going through the rigorous training required to become a practicing physician.
Whatever. You referred to my comment on prestige. Now you're twisting it into some issue about respect for being a doctor.
Dude there are no tiers its DO school.
Pretty clear. No one is going to be enamored by the DMU on your resume. Believe me.
Whatever. You referred to my comment on prestige. Now you're twisting it into some issue about respect for being a doctor.
So all DO schools are created equal?
It's all about how you perform, the school is irrelevant. DO schools, as a rule, have much less resources in the things that matter come time for residency. They have no departments, for example. You want to be a general surgeon? Well it would be really helpful to have a surgery department at your school, with a Program Director, someone that knows the climate and can make efforts to help you get a residency. As a DO, you will be entirely on your own. That's one of countless examples.
But wouldn't you agree that some schools give me a better chance at performing well than others?
So all DO schools are created equal?
Being a doctor in and of itself is prestigious.
Jeesh, you are very simple minded.
But wouldn't you agree that some schools give me a better chance at performing well than others?
You have a talent for not understanding the topic of conversation.
You explained how DO schools are not prestigious. I explained how they are by mentioning the end goal. Try to keep up.
The whole "tier" thing is made up by pre-meds to try to give justification about their school choice trying to belittle the others who did not accept them. It's a bunch of crap and you need not get sucked into the delusional hype it creates. Any medical school in the country is fine, you will be a doctor in the end. No one cares once you finish where you go.
You don't HAVE to be the best at everything...
NO, NO, NO, NO, NO. And the delusion persists.
? Care to elaborate.
I'm obviously not a med student but in my experience of going to different schools for taking ugrad course I notice a substantial difference in resources and rigor and I feel as though I'm learning a hell of a lot more where I am now than where I was before.
If all schools are the same, and it is all contingent on the student. then how do you account for variation that does exist between different schools based on standardized metrics such as COMLEX scores?
Note, I'm not saying that people are going to die because you went to accredited school X,Y,Z. Obviously, it is only accredited because it has a decent track record of preventing things like that. What I am saying though, is that beyond accreditation standards schools still do seem to have different outcomes with respect to their graduating classes learning and competence.
Any of them will provide the opportunity to succeed. I stress the word "opportunity". When it comes down to it, it's mostly on you. Besides, they will all put you through the wringer a few times, testing your stamina, patience, work-ethic, persistence, etc.
Go where you will be happy! Forget prestige, unless you think that will make you happy!
But wouldn't you agree that some schools give me a better chance at performing well than others?
Board scores are not really a measure of a school's performance. It's more on the individual student to prepare. Schools lay down the foundation; really devoting time to studying for the boards are what gives you the scores. The same student who scores 250+ on USMLE would have gotten that at any school he/she attended.
Your comfort level at the school will give you a better chance at peforming well. Not the school itself.
? Care to elaborate.
I'm obviously not a med student but in my experience of going to different schools for taking ugrad course I notice a substantial difference in resources and rigor and I feel as though I'm learning a hell of a lot more where I am now than where I was before.
If all schools are the same, and it is all contingent on the student. then how do you account for variation that does exist between different schools based on standardized metrics such as COMLEX scores?
Obligatory side note: I'm not saying that people are going to die because you went to accredited school X,Y,Z. Obviously, it is only accredited because it has a decent track record of preventing things like that. What I am saying though, is that beyond accreditation standards schools still do seem to have different outcomes with respect to their graduating classes learning and competence.
NO ONE can EVER say one school or one program is better than another.
I think therein lies the rub. Not to sound to tangential but obviously different people have different preferences for certain things (school mission, location, etc) that will allow them to do better at one school or another, like everyone else has said.
The problem with asserting that one school has more 'quality' over another is that most people seem to lump that as a sort of one-size fits all argument where because more people do well there *everyone* will do well there which is obviously untrue. But what I don't agree with in your original statement was your assertion that the school one attends will not have an impact on the skills they learn nor their career prospects down the line. I think there is ample evidence to suggest that is not true and where you go to school can have an impact on that. It obviously isn't the only impact but it's still an impact and the size of which varies from person to person.
My point is while students jump around to different undergrad schools on a regular basis and have a frame of reference between one or more institutions. This is generally not the case for medical school so to claim that one medical school is better over another cannot be stated when 99% of medical students ONLY attend one.
Agreed but I find arguing that the quality of a medical education and the opportunities it provides is entirely dependent on the individual so long as they attend an accredited school is specious. Just as saying the quality of a medical education is entirely dependent on the school and not the student is specious.
I happen to think that if you do get into med school in the United States that what an individual gets out of it is mostly due to what she makes out of it but like I said different schools may have better resources she can utilize as well which may not be available everywhere (such as quality rotations).
Well then technically that school is better 😉
No it isn't.
Yeah, Yale med gives you much better opportunity than PCOM. The same can't be said for PCOM vs RVU. We're talking about the "tiers" of DO schools. Those don't exist. None of the DO schools have the resources, the faculty, the facilities, the connections, etc that an elite medical school has. Among the DO schools themselves, all of it is very comparable and rather uninspiring.
the lowest tier school is the one that rejects you. The one you attend is the best school in the world and, ergo, the highest tier school. Even Harvard and Yale will never turn out a doctor like the one you become.
don't feel too bad op, my application plans next year are basically everything in my state and then the lowest gpa/mcat private md/do schools i can find to help increase odds of getting an acceptance. And i'd gladly brag about getting into the most crapped on name in the list. doctor is doctor to me
I swear, in real life you let this kind of stuff go because it's well intentioned, innocuous and really just makes people feel better about themselves. But this place, this SDN, seems to bring out the nit-picky, AXIS II: OCD, pedantic creep in all of us... and I don't know why.
Uniqueness doesn't necessarily pertain to quality. 😀