M.Sc. vs. Ph.d.

Discussion in 'Pre-Medical - MD' started by stwei, Mar 15, 2004.

  1. stwei

    stwei Senior Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know this is a forum for M.D. applicants, but can someone tell me what the benefits for earning a Ph.d. would be in biology/biochemistry as opposed to an M.Sc.? Isn't the long postgraduate work a grueling endeavor?
     
  2. exgatr

    exgatr Senior Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    1
    A Ph.D. will give you many more options. If you're interested in teaching at a university, you have to have a Ph.D. to get hired.

    If you're more interested in working in industry, an M.Sc. is good enough, bout you'll be paid less and if you get sick of working for a private company, you can't fall back to academia.

    If I were you, I'd getta Ph.D. for sure. They're usually free (with assistantship), and it's only a few more years.
     

Share This Page