- Joined
- Nov 16, 2003
- Messages
- 310
- Reaction score
- 10
I wanted to post a question here becuase it seems a lot of the opinions on matching from the pre-allo forums are from premeds conjecturing without much personal experience, but that's what you guys have. I'm accepted to two med schools - Penn St and Rosalind Franklin. I'm planning on attending Penn State for what I think are good reasons. I'd do well with the rural location, I appreciate the research opportunities, and the students whom I met were generally people I want to have as classmates. On the other hand, RFU wasn't in an attractive location, had far less research, and I didn't get a good vibe from its students (I have a friend who goes there and I learned a lot from him).
But there's one big issue that is sticking with me, and that's the match list for both schools. There are a few reasons for my concern. Both schools have an enormous price tag (40k tuition), and I'm extremely concerned about repaying med school loans. There are people who claim that even 250k worth of loans is no big deal. But I think it is, especially since the interest rates are rapidly increasing this year. Certain career paths are excluded. It would be extremely difficult to repay loans as a primary care doc in a rural area for example. Specializing would make repayment significantly easier.
Additionally, I think my ideal residency would be to do orthopedic surgery back here in Seattle (UW) or along the west coast. I know that my interests could change, but for simplicity, it could be any specialty on the west coast.
RFU's match list always has people going to specialty residencies along the west coast, particularly to UW. However, PSU barely sends anyone to either the west coast, or to specialties such as ortho with only 1-3 matches/year (versus ~6 in RFU). I'm not sure how to analyze this because there is a sentiment out there that med school is med school and that you can do any residency if you do well enough at any school. But then why doesnt' PSU match well to the west coast compared to RFU - particularly with the high number of CA residents who are students there? Why the limited ortho matches when PSU has a sports med clinic and extensive ortho dept in its hospital (which RFU doesn't have)? I know that PSU is big on primary care, but that shouldn't mean that it sacrifices its' students' matches into specialties, or does it? And the board scores are similar for both schools, so that's a moot point. There must be some sort of explanation for it.
What do you guys think of this? I want to be happy with my decision for med school and I'm not feeling completely vindicated by choosing PSU in regards to the above issues. If PSU only had the same match list as RFU, I'd know for sure where I wanted to go. But that isn't the case and I'm confused on what the best decision is for me.
But there's one big issue that is sticking with me, and that's the match list for both schools. There are a few reasons for my concern. Both schools have an enormous price tag (40k tuition), and I'm extremely concerned about repaying med school loans. There are people who claim that even 250k worth of loans is no big deal. But I think it is, especially since the interest rates are rapidly increasing this year. Certain career paths are excluded. It would be extremely difficult to repay loans as a primary care doc in a rural area for example. Specializing would make repayment significantly easier.
Additionally, I think my ideal residency would be to do orthopedic surgery back here in Seattle (UW) or along the west coast. I know that my interests could change, but for simplicity, it could be any specialty on the west coast.
RFU's match list always has people going to specialty residencies along the west coast, particularly to UW. However, PSU barely sends anyone to either the west coast, or to specialties such as ortho with only 1-3 matches/year (versus ~6 in RFU). I'm not sure how to analyze this because there is a sentiment out there that med school is med school and that you can do any residency if you do well enough at any school. But then why doesnt' PSU match well to the west coast compared to RFU - particularly with the high number of CA residents who are students there? Why the limited ortho matches when PSU has a sports med clinic and extensive ortho dept in its hospital (which RFU doesn't have)? I know that PSU is big on primary care, but that shouldn't mean that it sacrifices its' students' matches into specialties, or does it? And the board scores are similar for both schools, so that's a moot point. There must be some sort of explanation for it.
What do you guys think of this? I want to be happy with my decision for med school and I'm not feeling completely vindicated by choosing PSU in regards to the above issues. If PSU only had the same match list as RFU, I'd know for sure where I wanted to go. But that isn't the case and I'm confused on what the best decision is for me.