- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 4,561
- Pre-Medical

What are the math requirements for the majority of DO schools, I know a lot of MDs you need one semester of calc and one of stats but some schools are different. Overall my main question is would it be a bad decision not to take calc?
The best place to start looked at each school is the AACOM College Information Book : http://www.aacom.org/docs/default-source/cib/2015_cibfull-web.pdf?sfvrsn=12
Why doesn't AACOMAS factor math classes into sGPA @Goro
Generally most DO schools require 1 to 2 semesters of math. None require calculus outright, but some do require stat.
Then why do MD schools consider math/statistics in BCPM? And why do DO schools count physics as part of sGPA? It's just math.
I'd recommend taking statistics regardless of whether or not the school requires it. I'm still not sold on how relevant calculus is to medicine, but I also took it anyways. Do both if you can, but if you have to choose at least take statistics.
I second this wholeheartedly. Statistics has literally been the only math class that I can really apply to real life. I had an advanced psychological statistics course as well and it has greatly prepared me for research (if that is ever very important to me).
Calculus is just awful, along with physics. I honestly prefer organic chemistry to both of them.
Statistics as an applied theory driven thing is ok. But I prefer calc to stat because stat is literally just memorizing a bunch of tests that excel does for you. Though theory wise it teaches a lot of good stuff.
Calculus is just awful, along with physics. I honestly prefer organic chemistry to both of them.
.Whoa whoa whoa...lets not get all crazy now...If given the choice between organic chem and chewing on razor blades, I would strongly consider the razor chewing.
I still don't entirely comprehend the issue people have with organic chemistry. It was arguably one of my most interesting and entertaining classes.
The lab though, I would chew razors.
I have to agree. Organic chem was by far more interesting than gen chem ever was!I still don't entirely comprehend the issue people have with organic chemistry. It was arguably one of my most interesting and entertaining classes.
The lab though, I would chew razors.
I actually loved the lab. My real distaste actually stems from Organic II. My school went out of its way to make Organic much more painful that it had to be. There was no real multiple choice or anything. Basically, blank sheets of paper with 30-40 pt 10-15 step synthesis problems where they gave you a starting material and a desired product and the page was yours and then some really ugly mechanism problems. On a whole it wouldn't have been bad if you had say an hour and a half or so to do it, but they gave you an hour. Most of the exams had like a mean score in the 50's with many people (me included periodically) unable to finish the exam in the allotted time. It always really irked me that it COULD have been a good class if it was not made harder for no other purpose than to make it harder. So in the end, its not fair of me to totally hate on Orgo...I just hate how it was approached by my school. Other schools in the area seemed to have a much more tolerable approach.
Organic was a walk in the park compared to physics. Not to mention extremely interesting.I still don't entirely comprehend the issue people have with organic chemistry. It was arguably one of my most interesting and entertaining classes.
The lab though, I would chew razors.
Organic was a walk in the park compared to physics. Not to mention extremely interesting.
Physics is basically if hell and math had a baby.
Physics and me don't get along much. Although I find the conceptual aspects of physics fascinating, counting on my fingers isn't really conducive to effective problem solving in the class. hahaha Is it bad that I just admitted to thatOrganic was a walk in the park compared to physics. Not to mention extremely interesting.
Physics is basically if hell and math had a baby.

Understandable. I'm very good at math (I get lost in time doing it and even tutored the subject) and love bio/chem; however, within physics, the equation to physical scenario relationship just never clicked for me. I actually stopped doing problems second semester and tried my best to understand the logic/ theory behind it. And, somehow, that yielded better results for me.Physics for me is always a struggle. Maybe it's because I ended up trying to memorize it all instead of learning hah.
No, it's not: The right hand rule destroys all.Physics and me don't get along much. Although I find the conceptual aspects of physics fascinating, counting on my fingers isn't really conducive to effective problem solving in the class. hahaha Is it bad that I just admitted to that![]()
I wish I was more gifted in math. I have always struggled in that area. My mind just doesn't think that way. I would rather think about the qualitative/conceptual side of science. I think that is why I didn't like gen chem as much as orgo. In orgo I never picked up a calculator. 🙂Understandable. I'm very good at math (I get lost in time doing it and even tutored the subject) and love bio/chem; however, within physics, the equation to physical scenario relationship just never clicked for me. I actually stopped doing problems second semester and tried my best to understand the logic/ theory behind it. And, somehow, that yielded better results for me.
Maybe, most of my test questions were 3-5 steps ( 60% of the grade) and then 6-10 stepers ( 40% of the grade). I can't actually imagine a sincere 15 step synthesis problem by organic chem two admittedly. Mostly because there's a limit to the sheer amount of pertinent reactions that can happen.
.Understandable. I'm very good at math (I get lost in time doing it and even tutored the subject) and love bio/chem; however, within physics, the equation to physical scenario relationship just never clicked for me. I actually stopped doing problems second semester and tried my best to understand the logic/ theory behind it. And, somehow, that yielded better results for me.