Trouble Im having is that I feel your reads D1 had a lot more nuance and thought that your reads now.
For example, the wall on Achro was all super basic stuff lacking a lot of context.
Like, saying generic stuff of 'hungry to solve' or generally adjectives related to tone stuff which is... Weh.
But for more specific stuff , you saying that their argument/read on moon was a good look because "why a wolf would tell a townie to be cautios of their scum game" . Do you realize that using that same argument they voted them ?????
And just putting the reaction to moon claim as towny also seems bonkers. The whole read just felt like you trying to justify a bad/vague read you had.
Also why dont you have Stagg in the pool of explaining where a space kill comes from?
And why Clem of all people? Do you realize that they've been really consistent with their view since D1 ln you, and just very chilling and open in thread? Its a really agenda-less slot fmpov and dont see really an argument being made by you except 'look they doing nothing!! ' . Which from experience is the most used argument to try to yeet lhf town clem
@Gikkle