- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Messages
- 275
- Reaction score
- 0
I have serious questions:
1) what would be the minimal score to achieve such that people could label you as inherently smart? It is well known that people may improve their score a lot by just studying for the test, but beyond a certain point you hit a plateau. Obviously 45 means you're smart. At the same time 30 or 35 is clearly something one might study for. So pick something in between!
2) are there any of you that had really large improvements in verbal(over a course of 6 months for example)? i.e. get on ek passage1 something like 40/60 and then steadily climb through 55+ on ek11 or on the real thing. Please post the data documenting your progress. Thanks.
1) what would be the minimal score to achieve such that people could label you as inherently smart? It is well known that people may improve their score a lot by just studying for the test, but beyond a certain point you hit a plateau. Obviously 45 means you're smart. At the same time 30 or 35 is clearly something one might study for. So pick something in between!
2) are there any of you that had really large improvements in verbal(over a course of 6 months for example)? i.e. get on ek passage1 something like 40/60 and then steadily climb through 55+ on ek11 or on the real thing. Please post the data documenting your progress. Thanks.
