- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 424
- Reaction score
- 316
Don't worry about it ;-)
Last edited:
Id say your golden, are you applying to MD school in Canada too?
Apply to a good range of top and mid-tier schools you will be fine in the american system
Yeah, I'll look into those schools (though I feel like I may have done so but didn't add them to my list for some reason). I know I didn't add Mayo because I remember seeing an entry class of less than 50...
Lol, how do I make an appointment with this Goro guru?
Neither Geffen nor Drew interviewed any internationals last year.You're golden. Suggest swapping Rosy Franklin with Loyola, U Miami, or Tulane. Replace VCU and NYMC with Duke, Pitt and Hofstra.
Also consider UCLA/Drew.
Good list!. I think some 60-70 US MD schools accept international applicants, so you'll need to do your homework to see who you qualify for.
Howard
Johns Hopkins
Emory
Northwestern-Feinberg
Dartmouth
Albany
Cornell
Oakland (OUWB)
Penn State
Jefferson
Michigan State
Case Western
NYU
NYMC
Georgetown
George Washington
Wayne State
Saint Louis
Boston USM
Columbia
U Chicago
Virginia Commonwealth
Rosalind Franklin
Mount Sinai
Meharry
Harvard
Yale
Brown
You rang?
You're golden. Suggest swapping Rosy Franklin with Loyola, U Miami, or Tulane. Replace VCU and NYMC with Duke, Pitt and Hofstra.
Also consider UCLA/Drew.
Good list!. I think some 60-70 US MD schools accept international applicants, so you'll need to do your homework to see who you qualify for.
Howard
Johns Hopkins
Emory
Northwestern-Feinberg
Dartmouth
Albany
Cornell
Oakland (OUWB)
Penn State
Jefferson
Michigan State
Case Western
NYU
NYMC
Georgetown
George Washington
Wayne State
Saint Louis
Boston USM
Columbia
U Chicago
Virginia Commonwealth
Rosalind Franklin
Mount Sinai
Meharry
Harvard
Yale
Brown
You rang?
You're golden. Suggest swapping Rosy Franklin with Loyola, U Miami, or Tulane. Replace VCU and NYMC with Duke, Pitt and Hofstra.
Also consider UCLA/Drew.
Good list!. I think some 60-70 US MD schools accept international applicants, so you'll need to do your homework to see who you qualify for.
LOL, it's a online forum...there's a lot I'm not saying
The truth is that I don't know the answer to that question. As you've hypothesized, I reckon some schools might be a little funny about people who would have to terminate their masters (or professional program) to matriculate. I also don't really know what my referees wrote lol. Objectively, I have no reason to suspect any foul play per se but my gut feeling sometimes disagrees...I guess it's the only 'unknown'
And I was applying in my third year of undergrad so I would not have be admissible in schools like UWO (and some in Western Canada) that require applicants to be graduating prior to matriculation.
Regarding ECs, I wouldn't say they're my strongest suit. The stuff I summarized were probably the highlights of my ECs (and some of the stuff I mentioned did not apply at the time of my previous application).
Im confused, you say you applied during 3rd year of undergrad, but then mention the professional program stipulation. Which is it? Did you not apply in your 4th year, and/or this current year cycle (the 1st year of your new program)?
LOL, I'm guessing ad coms got confused too and decide 'forget this applicant...'
Maybe I'm confusing my use of 'cycle'. I applied in October 2014 (which is technically this cycle)...
Essentially, when I applied, I was not going to be graduating at the end of the academic year (i.e in June this year). So were I accepted this cycle, I would be skipping my last year of UG (and of my program) to start MD this Fall.
I don't know if that's a little more lucid...
At any rate, my inquiries now are pertaining to Fall 2016 matriculation. By that time, I will have (recently) received an undergraduate degree. So I'm hoping that the nature of my professional program won't affect me adversely this time around...
I'm trying understand what you mean by 'swap'. Is that to say, for example, Rosalind Franklin may not be a great choice but Loyola and U Miami are? Or if I had to pick one school to apply to between Rosalind Franklin and Loyola, Loyola might be the better choice (without suggesting that Rosy Franklin is not a good choice)?
Maybe I'm over-complicating this...
Schools like Rosy Franklin practice "Yield protection", which means they conserve their interview resources for handing out IIs for people most likely to come there. As schools, they're all fine, but Rosy might say "this kid will go to Yale or HMS, not here".
Yeah, I guess pragmatically, it must make sense. By strange, I mean it's not an idea I'm used to. I would think that if an applicant is good, every school would want him/her. The idea of assuming that someone with above average stats will not come to your school seems kind of odd...I mean the person must have had a reason for applying.They would probably send you a secondary, so that they can take your money of course. But then they would look at your stats and say "nope, no interview for you". Thats what hes saying.
It's not that strange of a concept when you think about it. Interviewing people takes time and resources. Why spend those if you have a very good idea that would will get an acceptance at a better school and never matriculate there? Its waste of their time and yours.
They would probably send you a secondary, so that they can take your money of course. But then they would look at your stats and say "nope, no interview for you". Thats what hes saying.
It's not that strange of a concept when you think about it. Interviewing people takes time and resources. Why spend those if you have a very good idea that would will get an acceptance at a better school and never matriculate there? Its waste of their time and yours.
Yeah, I guess pragmatically, it must make sense. By strange, I mean it's not an idea I'm used to. I would think that if an applicant is good, every school would want him/her. The idea of assuming that someone with above average stats will not come to your school seems kind of odd...I mean the person must have had a reason for applying.
So in terms of schools where that might be the case, do I essentially just not apply to schools where my stats are significantly above average or is it just certain schools where that's an important consideration?
All very reasonable...Still apply to them all.
Let the school itself decide, not you pre-emptively not applying. Its too much of a crap shoot to be too selective either way.
All very reasonable...
What I haven't heard so far are schools (especially those on my 'list') where my stats may not quite cut it (i.e where I might not have a good shot). Any thoughts there?
Ultimately, I'd like to limit my list to 15ish schools where I can reasonably expect an interview, at least.