- Joined
- Apr 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,948
- Reaction score
- 660
What do docs say to people who refuse vaccinations? I've never had the opportunity to talk to a doc about this.
My only experience with this was a guy who called me an idiot for getting the flu vaccine. When he asked me why I did it and I said that the CDC checks these things to ensure safety for people receiving the vaccination, he resorted to an anecdote about a family member who developed some neurological condition after being vaccinated. I didn't know what to say to this, so I blankly stared at him. (This guy was a Wharton grad!)
Edit: Typo.
Warning: Do not read the comments section, they are infuriating (as expected..)
What do docs say to people who refuse vaccinations? I've never had the opportunity to talk to a doc about this.
My only experience with this was a guy who called me an idiot for getting the flu vaccine. When he asked me why I did it and I said that the CDC checks these things to ensure safety for people receiving the vaccination, he resorted to an anecdote about a family member who developed some neurological condition after being vaccinated. I didn't know what to say to this, so I blankly stared at him. (This guy was a Wharton grad!)
Edit: Typo.
What a dumb response.![]()
Me, Moe, or the commenters to whom I was referring?
What do docs say to people who refuse vaccinations? I've never had the opportunity to talk to a doc about this.
My only experience with this was a guy who called me an idiot for getting the flu vaccine. When he asked me why I did it and I said that the CDC checks these things to ensure safety for people receiving the vaccination, he resorted to an anecdote about a family member who developed some neurological condition after being vaccinated. I didn't know what to say to this, so I blankly stared at him. (This guy was a Wharton grad!)
Edit: Typo.
The guy was probably referring to Guillain-Barre syndrome, and there is a connection (albeit extremely rare) to vaccinations. The guy was definitely overreacting, as the benefits of getting the vaccine is >>>>>>>>>> than any of the rare adverse effects, but I wouldn't say he was completely wrong.
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/guillainbarre.htm
I scribe in an ED, one time the doctor I was with saw a kid with whooping cough. Unvaccinated. Both his parents work in healthcare but they don't believe in vaccination. He didn't hold back.
So, n=2 and I hope this is NOT typical, but here's how it has gone both times that I've seen it come up in the ED:What do docs say to people who refuse vaccinations? I've never had the opportunity to talk to a doc about this.
The other side, I think is primarily the potential like to autism and side effects:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/03/24/autism.vaccines/index.html
http://www.generationrescue.org/resources/vaccination/
(I'm without a personal opinion on this since I haven't looked into it.)
Genius.Why doesn't the AAP just hire Megan Fox or someone younger and hotter than McCarthy to do a PSA on the safety of vaccinations?
Actually that should be a strategy for all healthcare and physician related PR.
This is so sad. I am assuming that the alarm was indicating that her oxygen level was tanking as she looked like she had difficulty breathing. I think every pediatrician should have videos like this to show patients who refuse to vaccinate their children.
Anyone read the part of that article where only .3% of people who contract measles will suffer a life threatening complication?
If you're going to try to argue this from a scientific perspective you are going to be destroyed, don't go complaining when people start attacking you for your poor grasp of scientific evidence.Ever read the studies indicating that pertussis is actually evolving because of the vaccine?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19538113
If you're going to try to argue this from a scientific perspective you are going to be destroyed, don't go complaining when people start attacking you for your poor grasp of scientific evidence.
🤣I hope you're not one of those "anti-science" types.
I scribe in an ED, one time the doctor I was with saw a kid with whooping cough. Unvaccinated. Both his parents work in healthcare but they don't believe in vaccination. He didn't hold back.
If you're going to try to argue this from a scientific perspective you are going to be destroyed, don't go complaining when people start attacking you for your poor grasp of scientific evidence.
Oh noes, it's evolving!Ever read the studies indicating that pertussis is actually evolving because of the vaccine?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19538113
Oh noes, it's evolving!
...but vaccination still works against it.
I don't care what the pathogen does on its own time as long as I have a way to prevent it from infecting humans.
Are you aware of what has happened to Staphylococcus aureus because of evolution? It became resistant to treatment. We had to develop new treatments and it is currently becoming resistant to them as well.
The point is you may not always have a way to prevent it. I hope you were just trying to be a wise guy with that post and it doesn't reflect your approach to medicine or science in general.
The guy was probably referring to Guillain-Barre syndrome, and there is a connection (albeit extremely rare) to vaccinations. The guy was definitely overreacting, as the benefits of getting the vaccine is >>>>>>>>>> than any of the rare adverse effects, but I wouldn't say he was completely wrong.
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/guillainbarre.htm
Are you aware of what has happened to Staphylococcus aureus because of evolution? It became resistant to treatment. We had to develop new treatments and it is currently becoming resistant to them as well.
The point is you may not always have a way to prevent it. I hope you were just trying to be a wise guy with that post and it doesn't reflect your approach to medicine or science in general.
You can also get Guillain Barre from the flu itself, not just from the vaccine.
You do understand that Staph. Aureus, MRSA, and VRSA evolved from antibiotic treatments? Most likely during the period of time in medicine (80s-90s) where antibiotics were both overpresecribed and UNDER taken because patients didnt take treatment plans seriously enough? If you don't complete a dull regimen it gives the remaining non-presenting bacteria a chance to replicate and evolve.
That is not how we treat Pertussis. We use toxoids that destroy the whole cell of the pathogen while circulating within the body as opposed to antibiotics which are selective poisons that usually just aim to prevent reproduction or inhibit the bacteria's ability to produce critical resources.
Im curious, is your solution to the current dilemma of growing antibiotic resistance (that we are actively working to curb now that we understand antibiotics more) not to treat? Because that is silly. When it results in the death of a patient, then that is idiotic, tragic.
Do you know what happens when Staph aureus goes untreated? If it finds a break in the skin it can spread to the kidneys and then you die.
The point is that the same thing is happening. MRSA evolved from antibiotics and pertussis is evolving due to the vaccine. The end result will be the same.
The point is that the same thing is happening. MRSA evolved from antibiotics and pertussis is evolving due to the vaccine. The end result will be the same.
The point is that the same thing is happening. MRSA evolved from antibiotics and pertussis is evolving due to the vaccine. The end result will be the same.
I think the real point is that you have a shaky understanding of how vaccines work vs how antibiotics work.The point is that the same thing is happening. MRSA evolved from antibiotics and pertussis is evolving due to the vaccine. The end result will be the same.
Are you aware of what has happened to Staphylococcus aureus because of evolution? It became resistant to treatment. We had to develop new treatments and it is currently becoming resistant to them as well.
The point is you may not always have a way to prevent it. I hope you were just trying to be a wise guy with that post and it doesn't reflect your approach to medicine or science in general.
Anyone read the part of that article where only .3% of people who contract measles will suffer a life threatening complication?