I wanted to ask if anyone (especially faculty members) could answer a question.
Does the medical school you attend effectively restrict or limit your chances of attending a residency in another location?
I am from Texas and because of cost I am about 98.9% sure I will attend a Texas medical school (if I am admitted).
But I would like to eventually practice in California. I keep looking at the match list of medical schools to see if the location matters and there seems to be a huge geographic bias.
USC's match list is full of california residencies. UT-Southwestern has mostly Texas.
I can't tell if this is because people are choosing to stay close to where they attended medical school or not.
Would going to a california medical school be worth it to have the chance to match in California?
P.S. I haven't been admitted to any med school, but I am thinking ahead. The difference in price between going to USC and any school in Texas is $160K principle (not even including interest).
Does the medical school you attend effectively restrict or limit your chances of attending a residency in another location?
I am from Texas and because of cost I am about 98.9% sure I will attend a Texas medical school (if I am admitted).
But I would like to eventually practice in California. I keep looking at the match list of medical schools to see if the location matters and there seems to be a huge geographic bias.
USC's match list is full of california residencies. UT-Southwestern has mostly Texas.
I can't tell if this is because people are choosing to stay close to where they attended medical school or not.
Would going to a california medical school be worth it to have the chance to match in California?
P.S. I haven't been admitted to any med school, but I am thinking ahead. The difference in price between going to USC and any school in Texas is $160K principle (not even including interest).